The limited understanding of how ecosystem service knowledge (ESK) is used in decision making constrains our ability to learn from, replicate, and convey success stories. We explore use of ESK in decision making in three international cases: national coastal planning in Belize; regional marine spatial planning on Vancouver Island, Canada; and regional land-use planning on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. Decision makers, scientists, and stakeholders collaborated in each case to use a standardized ecosystem service accounting tool to inform spatial planning. We evaluate interview, survey, and observation data to assess evidence of ‘conceptual’, ‘strategic’, and ‘instrumental’ use of ESK. We find evidence of all modes: conceptual use dominates early planning, while strategic and instrumental uses occur iteratively in middle and late stages. Conceptual and strategic uses of ESK build understanding and compromise that facilitate instrumental use. We highlight attributes of ESK, characteristics of the process, and general conditions that appear to affect how knowledge is used. Meaningful participation, scenario development, and integration of local and traditional knowledge emerge as important for particular uses.
AlmeidaCBáscoloE, 2006, “Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation and implementation: A review of the literature”Cadernos Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro22SupplementS7–S33
2.
AshNBlancoHBrownCGarciaKHenrichsTLucasNRaudsepp-HearneCSimpsonR DScholesRTomichT PViraBZurekM, 2010Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Manual for Assessment Practitioners (Island Press, Washington, DC)
3.
AshfordJ BLeCroyC W, 1991, “Problem solving in social work practice: Implications for knowledge utilisation”Research on Social Work Practice1306–318
4.
BedellJ RWardJ CJrArcherR PStokesM K, 1985, “An empirical evaluation of a model of knowledge utilisation”Evaluation Review9109–126
5.
BeierleT CKoniskyD M, 2001, “What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19515–527
6.
BinghamGBishopRBrodyMBromleyDClarkE TCooperWCostanzaRHaleTHaydenGKellertSNorgaardRNortonBPayneJRussellCSuterG, 1995, “Issues in ecosystem valuation: Improving information for decision making”Ecological Economics1473–90
7.
BogenschneiderKOlsonJ RLinneyK DMillsJ, 2000, “Connecting research and policymaking: Implications for theory and practice from the family impact seminars”Family Relations49327–339
8.
BoswellC, 2008, “The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy”Journal of European Public Policy15471–488
9.
BoyerJ FLangbeinL I, 1991, “Factors influencing the use of health evaluation research in congress”Evaluation Review15507–532
10.
CashDClarkWAlcockFDicksonNEckleyNJäger, 2002, “Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision making”, WP RWP02–046, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
11.
CGIAR, 2008, “Impact assessment of policy-oriented research in the CGIAR: Evidence and insights from case studies, study commissioned by the Science Council Standing Panel on Impact Assessment”, CGIAR Science Council Secretariat, Rome
12.
CowellRLennonM, 2014, “The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land-use planning: Drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32263–282
13.
DailyG CMatsonP A, 2008, “Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1052455–2456
14.
DailyG CPolaskySGoldsteinJKareivaP MMooneyH APejcharLRickettsT HSalzmanJShallenbergerR, 2009, “Ecosystem services in decision-making: Time to deliver”Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment721–28
15.
DasguptaPLevinSLubchencoJ, 2000, “Economic pathways to ecological sustainability”BioScience50339–345
16.
DavoudiS, 2006, “The evidence–policy interface in strategic waste planning for urban environments: The ‘technical’ and the ‘social’ dimensions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24681–700
17.
DeFriesR SFoleyJ AAsnerG P, 2004, “Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function”Frontiers in Ecology and Environment2249–257
18.
de GrootR SAlkemadeRBraatLHeinLWillemenL, 2010, “Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making”Ecological Complexity7260–272
19.
EngelSPagiolaSWunderS, 2008, “Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues”Ecological Economics65663–674
20.
EstabrooksC A, 1999, “Modeling the individual determinants of research utilisation”Western Journal of Nursing Research21758–772
21.
GarretJ LIslamY, 1988, “Policy research and the policy process: Do the twain ever meet”, IIED Gatekeeper Series, volume 74, International Institute for Environment and Development, London
22.
GoldsteinJCaldaroneGDuarteT KEnnaanayDHannahsNMendozaGPolaskySWolnySDailyG C, 2012a, “Integrating ecosystem services into land-use planning”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1097565–7570
23.
GoldsteinJCaldaroneGDailyG CDuarteKHannahsNMcKenzieE, 2012b, “InVEST scenarios case study: Hawaii, USA”, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC
GuerryA DRuckelshausM HArkemaKBernhardtJ RGuannelGKimC KMarsikMPapenfusMToftJ EVerutesGWoodS ABeckMChanFChanK M AGelfenbaumGGoldB DHalpernB SLabiosaW BLesterS ELevinP SMcFieldMPinskyM LPlummerMPolaskySRuggieroPSutherlandD ATallisHDayASpencerJ, 2012, “Modeling benefits from nature: Using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning”International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management8107–121
26.
Haines-YoungRPotschinM, 2014, “The ecosystem approach as a framework for knowledge utilisation”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32301–319
27.
HansonCRanganathanJIcelandCFinsidoreJ, 2008The Corporate Ecosystem Services Review: Guidelines for Identifying Business Risks and Opportunities Arising from Ecosystem Change (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC)
28.
HertinJTurnpennyJJordanANilssonMRusselDNykvistB, 2009, “Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process”Environment and Planning A411185–1200
29.
HirdJ, 2005, “Policy analysis for what? The effectiveness of nonpartisan policy research organizations”Policy Studies Journal3383–105
30.
HockleyN, 2014, “The use and influence of cost-benefit analysis: A venue for integrating ecosystem knowledge in decision making”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32293–300
31.
VeldIn't RdeWitA, 2000, “Clarifications”, in Willingly and Knowingly: The Roles of Knowledge about Nature and the Environment in Policy Processes Ed. VeldIn't R (Lemma, Utrecht) pp 147–157
32.
JordanARusselD, 2014, “Embedding an ecosystems services approach? The utilisation of ecological knowledge in decision making”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32192–207
33.
KareivaPTallisHRickettsTDailyGPolaskyS, 2011Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
34.
KarlH ASusskindL EWallaceK H, 2007, “A dialogue, not a diatribe: Effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding”Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development4920–34
35.
KingdonJ W, 1995Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (Addison Wesley Educational, Boston, MA)
36.
KornovLThissenW, 2000, “Rationality in decision- and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment”Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal18191–200
37.
KothariU, 2001, “Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Books, London) pp 139–152
38.
KremenC, 2005, “Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology?”Ecology Letters8468–479
39.
KushnerBWaiteRJungwiwattanapornMBurkeL, 2012, “Influence of coastal economic valuations in the Caribbean: Enabling conditions and lessons learned”, Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
40.
LauransYRankovicABilléRPirardRMermetL, 2013, “Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: Questioning a literature blindspot”Journal of Environmental Management119208–219
41.
McKenzieEIrwinFRanganathanJHansonCKouskyCBennettKRuffoSConteMSalzmanJPaavolaJ, 2010, “Incorporating ecosystem services in decisions”, in Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services Eds KareivaPTallisHRickettsTDailyGPolaskyS (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 339–355
42.
MEA, 2005aCurrent State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group Eds HassanRScholesRAshN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Island Press, Washington, DC)
43.
MEA, 2005bEcosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Island Press, Washington, DC)
44.
NaidooRMalcolmTTomasekA, 2009, “Economic benefits of standing forests in highland areas of Borneo: Quantification and policy impacts”Conservation Letters235–44
45.
Natural Capital Project, 2010, “The Natural Capital Project strategic plan”, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
46.
NelsonEMensozaGRegetzJPolaskySTallisHCameronD RChanK M ADailyG CGoldsteinJKareivaPLonsdorfENaidooRRickettsT HShawM R, 2009, “Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production and tradeoffs at landscape scales”Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment74–11
47.
NeßhöverCTimaeusJWittmerHKriegAGeamanaNvan den HoveSYoungJWattA, 2013, “Improving the science–policy interface of biodiversity research projects”GAIA2299–103
48.
NRC, 2004Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-making National Research Council (National Academies Press, Washington, DC)
49.
NRC, 2012Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy National Research Council (National Academies Press, Washington, DC)
50.
OlssonPFolkeCHughesT P, 2008, “Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1059489–9494
51.
OwensS, 2005, “Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30287–292
52.
OwensSRaynerTBinaO, 2004, “New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice and research”Environment and Planning A361943–1959
53.
OwensSPettsJBulkeleyH, 2006, “Boundary work: Knowledge, policy, and the urban environment”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24633–643
54.
PattonM QGrimesP SGuthrieK MBrennanN JFrenchB DBlythD A, 1977, “In search of impact: An analysis of the utilisation of Federal Health Evaluation Research”, in Using Social Research in Public Policy Making Ed. WeissC H (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 141–164
55.
PelzD CHorsleyJ A, 1981, “Measuring utilisation of nursing research”, in Utilizing Evaluation: Concepts and Measurement Techniques Ed. CiarloJ (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 125–149
56.
PetersonM A, 1995, “How health policy information is used in Congress”, in Intensive Care: How Congress Shapes Health Policy Eds MannT EOrnsteinN J (American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) pp 79–125
57.
ReedM S, 2008, “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review”Biological Conservation1412417–2431
58.
ReidR SNkedianyeDSaidM YKaeloDNeselleMMakuiOOnetuLKiruswaSKamuaroOle NKristjansonPOgutuJBurnSilverS BGoldmanM JBoonR BGalvinK ADicksonN MClarkW C, 2009, “Evolution of models to support community and policy action with science: Balancing pastoral livelihoods and wildlife conservation in savannas of East Africa”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1097565–7570
59.
RichA, 2001, “The politics of expertise in Congress and the news media”Social Science Quarterly82583–601
60.
RichR F, 1997, “Measuring knowledge utilisation: Process and outcomes”Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilisation10(3) 11–24
61.
RuckelshausM HMcKenzieETallisHGuerryADailyGKareivaPPolaskySRickettsTBhagabatiNWoodSBernhardtJ, in press, “Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem services to inform real-world decisions”Ecological Economics
62.
SabatierP A, 1987, “Knowledge, policy-oriented learning and policy change”Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation8649–692
63.
SabatierP A, 1988, “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”Policy Sciences21129–168
64.
SabatierP A, 2007Theories of the Policy Process (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
65.
SabatierP AJenkins-SmithH C, 1993Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
66.
SeppeltRDormannC FEppinkF VLautenbachSSchmidtS, 2011, “A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead”Journal of Applied Ecology48630–636
67.
SpilsburyM JNasiR, 2006, “The interface of policy research and the policy development process: Challenges posed to the forestry community”Forest Policy and Economics8193–205
68.
TallisHPolaskyS, 2009, “Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural resource management”Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1162265–283
TEEB, 2010The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations Ed. KumarP, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, United Nations Environment Programme, Washington, DC
71.
TomichTChomitzKFranciscoHIzacA NMurdiyarsoDRatnerB DThomasD Evan NoordwijkM, 2004, “Policy analysis and environmental problems at different scales: Asking the right questions”Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment1045–18
72.
TrostleJBronfmanMLangerA, 1999, “How do researchers influence decision-makers? Case studies of Mexican policies”Health Policy Plan14103–114
73.
TurnerR KDailyG C, 2008, “The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation”Environmental and Resource Economics3925–35
74.
TurnpennyJRusselDJordanA, 2014, “The challenge of embedding an ecosystems services approach: Patterns of knowledge utilisation in public policy appraisal”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32247–262
van KerkhoffLLebelL, 2006, “Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development”Annual Review of Environment and Resources31445–477
77.
VihervaaraPRönkäMWallsM, 2010, “Trends in ecosystem service research: Early steps and current drivers”Ambio39314–324
78.
WaylenKYoungJ, 2014, “Expectations and experiences of diverse forms of knowledge use: The case of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32229–246
79.
WCA, 2012Coastal Strategy for the West Coast Vancouver Island. West Coast Aquatic, Port Alberni, BC
80.
WeissC, 1979, “The many meanings of research utilisation”Public Administration Review39426–431
81.
WeissC, 1989, “Congressional Committees as users of analysis”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management8411–431
YoungJ CJordanASearleK RButlerASimmonsPWattA D, 2013b, “Framing scale in participatory biodiversity management may contribute to more sustainable solutions”Conservation Letters6333–340
