Designated high-tech spaces such as science and high-technology parks have come to the fore as vehicles for promoting local and regional economic development in many nations. The evidence of their efficacy is mixed and reflects contradictions in the roles they are asked to perform in the service of national economic modernization. Indeed, in this respect and in many instances, their value may be largely political and rhetorical. Malaysia is a case in point and one we focus on in this paper, where we discuss the contribution of high-tech spaces—Kulim High-Tech Park, Technology Park Malaysia, BioXCell, and the multimedia supercorridor—to the political economy of economic modernization. Drawing on original interview material, we highlight the tangled intraterritorial and extraterritorial geographies in which these privileged high-tech spaces are positioned.
AppaduraiA, 1996Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (University of Minnesota Press, University of Minnesota, MN)
2.
BoschmaRFrenkenK, 2011, “Technological relatedness and regional branching”, in Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation. Eds BatheltHFeldmanM PKoglerD F (Routledge, London) pp 64–81
3.
BowieA, 1994, “The dynamics of business-government relations in industrializing Malaysia”, in Business and Government in Industrialising Asia Ed. MacIntyreA (Allen and Unwin, Sydney) pp 167–194
4.
BowieAUngerD, 1997The Politics of Open Economies: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
5.
BunnellT, 2004Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor: A Critical Geography of Intelligent Landscapes (Routledge, London)
6.
BunnellTBarterPMorshidiS, 2002, “Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area: a globalizing city”Cities19357–370
7.
DawoodS R S, 2001The Globalisation of Economic Activities and the Dynamic Growth of an Industrial Region in Pacific Asia: The Linkages between Transnational Firms in the Manufacturing Sector and Engineering Services in Klang Valley, MalaysiaUnpublished PhD thesis, School of Geography, University of Leeds
8.
DawoodS R S, 2010, “The role of research and development related KIBS in bio-technology industries of Malaysia”International Journal of Arts and Sciences3368–385
9.
DriffieldNNoorA H M, 1999, “Foreign direct investment and local input linkages in Malaysia”Transnational Corporations81–24
10.
EPU, Economic Planning Unit, Kuala Lumpur
11.
1971Second Malaysia Plan, 1971–1975
12.
1996Seventh Malaysia Plan, 1996–2000
13.
2001Eighth Malaysia Plan, 2001–2005
14.
2006Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006–2010
15.
2010Tenth Malaysia Plan, 2011–2015
16.
2011a, “Chapter 5: developing Malaysia into a knowledge-based economy. The Third Outline Perspective Plan (OPP3)”, http://www.epu.gov.my/web/guest/third
FelkerG, 2001, “The politics of industrial investment policy reform in Malaysia and Thailand”, in South East Asia's Industrialisation: Industrial Policy, Capabilities and Sustainability Ed. JomoK S (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 129–182
20.
ForsythACreweK, 2010, “Suburban technopoles as places: the international campus-garden-suburb style”Urban Design International15165–182
21.
GomezE T, 2012, “The politics and policies of corporate development: race, rents and redistribution in Malaysia”, in Malaysia's Development Challenges: Graduating from the Middle Eds HillHYeonT SZinR H M (Routledge, London) pp 63–82
22.
HallPCastellsM, 1994Technopoles of the World (Routledge, London)
23.
HardingA, 2012The Constitution of Malaysia: A Contextual Analysis (Hart, Oxford)
24.
HariantoFSafarianA E, 1997, “MNEs and technology diffusion: a Southeast Asian experience”, in Multinational Firms and International Relocation Eds BuckleyP JMucchielliJ-L (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 189–219
25.
HassanA A A G, 2004Growth, Structural Change and Regional Inequality in Malaysia (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
26.
HillH, 2012, “Malaysian economic development: looking backward, looking forward”, in Malaysia's Development Challenges: Graduating from the Middle Eds HillHYeonT SZinR H M (Routledge, London) pp 1–42
27.
JacobsJ, 1969The Economy of Cities (Jonathan Cape, London)
28.
KawashimaTStöhrW, 1988, “Decentralized technology policy: the case of Japan”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy6427–439
29.
LepawskyJ, 2009, “Clustering as anti-politics machine: situating the politics of regional economic development and Malaysia's multimedia super corridor”Regional Studies43463–478
30.
LinkA NScottJ T, 2003, “US science park: the diffusion of an innovation and its effect on the academic missions of universities”International Journal of Industrial Organisation211323–1356
31.
McGeeT M, 1967The South East Asian City: A Social Geography of the Primate Cities of South East Asia (G Bell and Sons, London)
32.
MalairajaCZawdieG, 2008, “Science parks and university-industry collaboration in Malaysia”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management20727–739
33.
ManiS, 2002Government, Innovation and Technology: An International Comparative Analysis (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
34.
MasseyDQuintasPWieldD, 1992High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society and Space (Routledge, London)
35.
Ministry of Trade and Industry, 2006Third Industrial Master Plan (IMP3) (2006–2020): Malaysia— Towards Competitiveness Kuala Lumpar
36.
NambiarP, 2009, “UEM Land, BiotechCorp to develop site in Nusajaya”New Straits Times 22 May, page 6
37.
O'RiainS, 2004The Politics of High-tech Growth: Developmental Network Stats in the Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
PerrinJ C, 1988, “A deconcentrated technology policy—lessons from the Sophia-Antipolis experience”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy6415–426
40.
PhelpsN A, 2004a, “Clusters, dispersion and the spaces in between: for an economic geography of the banal”Urban Studies41971–989
41.
PhelpsN A, 2004b, “Triangular diplomacy writ small: the political economy of the Indonesia-Malaysia-Singapore growth triangle”The Pacific Review17341–368
42.
PhelpsN A, 2007, “Gaining from globalisation? State extra-territoriality and domestic economic impacts—the case of Singapore”Economic Geography83371–393
43.
PhelpsN A, 2009, “From branch plant economies to knowledge economies? Manufacturing industry, government policy, and economic development in Britain's older industrial regions”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27574–592
44.
RamasamyBChakrabartyACheaM, 2004, “Malaysia's leap into the future: an evaluation of the multimedia super corridor”Technovation24871–883
45.
ScottJ, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
Tidd J, Brockleshurst M, 1999, “Routes to technological learning and development: an assessment of Malaysia's innovation policy and performance”Technological Forecasting and Social Change62239–257
48.
TrezziniB, 2001, “Embedded state autonomy and legitimacy: piecing together the Malaysian development puzzle”Economy and Society30324–353
49.
WadeR H, 1990Governing the Market (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
