Partnerships have become established as a significant vehicle for the implementation of rural development policy in Britain. In promoting new working relationships between different state agencies and between the public, private, and voluntary sectors, partnerships have arguably contributed to a reconfiguration of the scalar hierarchy of the state. In this paper we draw on recent debates about the ‘politics of scale’ and on empirical examples from Mid Wales and Shropshire to explore the scalar implications of partnerships. We investigate how discursive constructs of partnership are translated into practice, how official discourses are mediated by local actors, the relationship between partnerships and existing scales of governance, and the particular ‘geometry of power’ being constructed through partnerships. We argue that the existing scalar hierarchy of the state has been influential in structuring the scales and territories of partnerships, and that, despite an apparent devolution of the public face of governance, the state remains crucial in governing the process of governance through partnerships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArlaudSPérigordM, (Eds), 1999, “Pays et développement local: Issue thématique” [Thematic issue: Local territories and local development]NOROIS: Revue géographique de l'Ouest et des pays de l'Atlantique Nord181.
2.
AtkinsonR, 1999, “Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration”Urban Studies3659 – 72.
3.
BryantPGreenleesAThomasS, 1997Building Communities: Community – led DevelopmentWales Council for Voluntary Action, Crescent Road, Caerphilly, CF83 1XL.
4.
ClarkeJNewmanJ, 1997The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology on the Remaking of Social Welfare (Sage, London).
5.
CoxK, 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11433 – 448.
6.
CoxK, 1998, “Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale”Political Geography171 – 23.
7.
CoxKMairA, 1991, “From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197 – 213.
8.
DBRW, 1997Rural Wales 1996/97: Challenge, Change and AchievementDevelopment Board for Rural Wales, Ladywell House, Newtown, Powys SY16 1JB.
9.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political construction of scale”Political Geography1693 – 97.
10.
DoE, 1995Rural England: A Nation Committed to a Living Countryside Cm 3016, Department of the Environment (HMSO, London).
EdwardsB, 1998, “Charting the discourse of community action: Perspectives from practice in rural Wales”Journal of Rural Studies1463 – 78.
13.
EdwardsBGoodwinMPembertonSWoodsM, 1999, “New forms of rural governance? Partnerships, power and regeneration in rural Wales”, paper presented to RGS – IBG Conference, University of Leicester, January 1999; copy available from the authors, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB.
14.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchellGGordonCMillerP, (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 87–104.
15.
GoodwinM, 1998, “The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas”Journal of Rural Studies145 – 12.
16.
HastingsA, 1999, “Analysing power relations in partnerships: Is there a role for discourse analysis?”Urban Studies3691 – 106.
17.
JessopB, 1995, “The regulation approach, governance and post – FordismEconomy and Society24307 – 334.
18.
JessopB, 1997, “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: Accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects and governance”, in Reconstructing Regime Theory Ed. LauriaM, (Sage, London) pp 51–73.
19.
JessopB, 1999, “Reflections on globalization and its (il)logics” inGlobalization and the Asia Pacific Eds DickenPKelleyPOldsKYeungH, (Routledge, London) pp 19–38.
20.
JessopBNeilsenKPedersenO K, 1993, “Structural competitiveness and strategic capacities: Rethinking the state and international capital”, in Institutional Change: Theory and Empirical Findings Ed. SjöstrandS E, (M E Sharpe, London) pp 227–262.
21.
JonesK, 1998, “Scale as epistemology”Political Geography1725 – 28.
22.
JonesM R, 1997, “Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831 – 864.
23.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999, “Towards a regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295 – 314.
24.
KirbyA, 1993Power/Resistance: Local Politics and the Chaotic State (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).
25.
LowndesVNantonPMcCabeASkelcherC, 1997, “Networks, partnerships and urban regeneration”Local Economy11333 – 342.
26.
McCabeALowndesVSkelcherC, 1997Partnerships and Networks: An Evaluation and Development ManualJoseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York YO30 6WP.
27.
MackintoshM, 1992, “Partnership: Issues of policy and negotiation”Local Economy7210 – 224.
28.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999, “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics and explanation”Political Geography18697 – 730.
29.
Mid Wales Partnership, 1996A Strategic Framework to Develop the RegionMid Wales Partnership, Ladywell House, Newtown, Powys SY16 1JB.
30.
MurdochJ, 1997, “The shifting territory of government: Some insights from the Rural White Paper”Area29109 – 118.
31.
MurdochJAbramS, 1998, “Defining the limits of community governance”Journal of Rural Studies1441 – 50.
32.
MurdochJMarsdenT, 1995, “The spatialization of politics: Local and national actor – spaces in environmental conflict”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series20368 – 380.
33.
RayC, 1998, “Territory, structures and interpretation: Two case studies of the European Union's LEADER I Programme”Journal of Rural Studies1479 – 88.
34.
RayC, 1999, “Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity”Journal of Rural Studies15257 – 267.
35.
RoseN, 1993, “Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism”Economy and Society22283 – 299.
36.
RoseN, 1996, “Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies”, in Foucault and Political Reason Eds BarryAOsborneTRoseN, (UCL Press, London) pp 37–64.
37.
Scottish Office, 1995Rural Scotland: People, Prosperity and Partnership: The Government's Policies for the Rural Communities of Scotland Cm 3041 (HMSO, London).
38.
SmithA, 1995L'Europe politique au miroir du local: Les fonds structurels et les zones rurales en France, en Espagne et au Royaume Uni. [European politics in the local mirror: The structural funds and rural areas in France, Spain and the United Kingdom] (L'Harmattan, Paris).
39.
SmithA, 1998, “The politics of economic development in a French rural area”, in Public – Private Partnerships for Local Economic Development Eds WalzerNJacobsB D, (Praeger, London) pp 227–241.
40.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Re-asserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK, (Guilford, New York) pp 138–166.
41.
TaylorM, 1997The Best of Both Worlds: The Voluntary Sector and Local GovernmentJoseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York YO30 6WP.
42.
Tewdwr-JonesM, 1998, “Rural government and community participation: The planning role of community councils”Journal of Rural Studies1451 – 62.
43.
WardNMcNicholasK, 1998, “Reconfiguring rural development in the UK: Objective 5b and the new rural governance”Journal of Rural Studies1427 – 40.
44.
WardNWoodwardR, 1997, “Pockets of periphery in a prosperous region: The EU's Objective 5b programme and the new rural governance in East Anglia”, paper presented to the Rural Economy and Society Study Group Conference, Worcester; copy available from the authors, Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
45.
Welsh Office, 1996A Working Countryside for Wales Cm 3180 (The Stationery Office, London).
46.
WestholmEMoseleyMStenlåsN, (Eds), 1999Local Partnerships and Rural Development in Europe: A Literature Review of Practice and Theory. Darlana Research Institute, Falun, Sweden.
47.
WilsonACharltonK, 1997Making Partnerships Work: A Practical Guide for the Public, Private and Voluntary SectorsJoseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York YO30 6WP.
48.
WoodsM, 1997, “Discourses of power and rurality: Local politics in Somerset in the 20th century”Political Geography16453 – 478.
49.
WoodsM, 1998a, “Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government”Journal of Rural Studies1413 – 26.
50.
WoodsM, 1998b, “Research rural conflicts: Hunting, local politics and actor – networks”Journal of Rural Studies14321 – 340.
51.
WoodsM, 1998c, “Rethinking elites: Networks, space and local politics”Environment and Planning A302101 – 2119.
