In this paper we explore the tensions in metropolitan-level governance between strategic planning and desires for political decentralisation. We do this through a three-part analysis. First, we focus on the 2008 election strategy of Boris Johnson to become Mayor of London, with its aim of gaining suburban votes and giving more autonomy to the local borough level. We then look at the impacts of this campaign on electoral results; and, finally, we look at the outcome of the Outer London Commission, which was set up by the Mayor after the election to deal with strategic issues concerning London's suburbs. We find that a strategic intent to benefit suburban residents and the decentralisation of power to the boroughs are contradictory and have led to a policy stalemate.
BachrachPBaratzM“The two forces of power”. The American Political Science Review196256: 947–952.
2.
BrennerN“Global cities, global states: global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”. Review of International Political Economy19985: 1–37.
3.
BrennerN“Globalisation as reterritorialisation”. Urban Studies199936: 431–51.
4.
BulpittJ (1986) Territory and Power in the United Kingdom, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
5.
ButlerTHamnettCRamsdenM“Inward and upward? Marking out social class change in London 1981-2001”. Urban Studies200827: 217–228.
6.
CochraneAPhelpsNWuF“Post-suburbia in the context of urban containment: the case of the South East of England”. in International Perspectives on Suburbanisation: A Post-Suburban World?2011Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 192–210.
7.
CoxK R“Commentary from the new urban politics to the ‘new’ metropolitan politics”. Urban Studies201148: 2661–2671.
8.
DETR. Greater London Authority Act1999London: The Stationery Office.
9.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Reserach, London: Routledge.
10.
FrancoliMWardS“21st century soapboxes? MPs and their blogs”. Information Polity200813: 21–39.
11.
GLA, 2010, “The Mayer's Outer London Commission: Report”, Greater London Authority, London.
12.
GLA, 2012, “Land for industry and transport”, supplementary planning guidance, Greater London Authority, London.
13.
GordonIRCheshireP CGordonIR“London World City: political and organisational constraints on territorial competition”. Territorial Competition in an Integrating Europe1995Aldershot, Hants: Avebury, pp. 295–311.
14.
GordonIRTraversT“London: planning the ungovernable city”. City, Culture and Society20101: 49–55.
15.
Gordon |IR, Harding A, Harloe M, 2012, “Leadership, legitimacy and the uncertain development of metropolitan governance: comparing England's first and second city-regions”, paper for conference on ‘Governing the metropolis: powers and territories’, City Hall, Paris, 28-30 November, http://governingthemetropolis.paris.fr/dpmc/document?id=142&id_attribute=127.
16.
HamnettCButlerT“The changing ethnic structure of housing tenures in London”. Urban Studies201047: 55–74.
17.
HolmanNThornleyA“The reversal of strategic planning in London: the Boris effect with a focus on sustainability”. Observatoire de la Société Britannique201111: 145–159.
18.
HoogheLMarksG“Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance”. American Political Science Review200397: 233–243.
19.
JohnsonB (2008a) Making London's Mayor Accountable, London: Conservative Party.
20.
JohnsonB (2008b) Building a Better London, London: Conservative Party.
21.
JohnsonB (2008c) Getting London Moving, London: Conservative Party.
22.
JohnsonJ“The perfect political storm”. The Political Quarterly200879: 434–437.
23.
KantorPLefèvreCSaitoASavitchH VThornleyA (2012) Struggling Giants: City-region Governance in London, New York, Paris and Tokyo, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
KeilR“The global city comes home: internalised globalisation in Frankfurt Rhine-Main”. Urban Studies201148: 2495–2517.
25.
KüblerDPaganoMMossbergerKClarkeS EJohnP“Urban politics as multilevel analysis”. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics2012New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–130.
26.
LeemansA F (1970) Changing Patterns of Local Government, The Hague: International Union of Local Authorities.
27.
LefèvreC“Metropolitan government and governance in Western countries: a critical review”. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research199822: 9–25.
MaceA (2013) City Suburbs: Placing Suburbia in a Post-suburban World, London: Routledge.
30.
NewmanPThornleyA“Fragmentation and centralisation in the governance of London: influencing the urban policy and planning agenda”. Urban Studies199734: 967–988.
31.
NewmanPThornleyA (2012) Planning World Cities: Globalization and Urban Politics, 2nd. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
PetersB GPierreJ“Developments in intergovernmental relations: towards multi-level governance”. Policy and Politics200129: 131–135.
33.
PhelpsNWoodA“The new post-suburban politics”. Urban Studies201148: 2591–2610.
34.
PhelpsNWuF (2011) International Perspectives on Suburbanisation: A Post-suburban World?, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
PhelpsNWoodAVallerD“A post-suburban world? An outline of a research agenda”. Environment and Planning A201042: 366–383.
ReisiglMWodakRWodakRMeyerM“The discourse-historical approach (DHA)”. in Methods in Critical Discourse Analysis20092nd. London: Sage, pp. 87–121.
39.
RobertsonSFaircloughNWodakRJessopB“Embracing the global: crisis and the creation of a new semiotic order to secure Europe's knowledge-based economy”. in Education in the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe2008Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 89–108.
40.
SaletWThornleyAKreukelsA (2003) Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning, London: Spon Press.
41.
SavitchHKantorP (2002) Cities in the International Marketplace, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
ScottA (2001) Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.
