Institutional responses to climate change stresses through planning will require new and amended forms of governance. Institutional framing of change imperatives can significantly condition associated governance responses. This paper builds on scholarly conversations concerning the conceptual role of ‘storylines’ in shaping institutional responses to climate change through governance. I draw on conceptual perspectives of climate change as a ‘transformative stressor’, which can compel institutional transformation within planning. The concepts of storylines and transformative stressors are conceptually linked. The conceptual approach is applied to an empirical enquiry focused on the regional planning regime of South East Queensland (SEQ), Australia. In this paper I report on and examine three institutional storylines of responding to climate change through planning governance in SEQ. I conclude that the manifestation of climate change as a transformative stressor in SEQ prompted institutional transformation, leading to a dominant storyline focused on climate adaptation as an important facet of regional planning governance.
AbbottJ (2009) “Planning for complex metropolitan regions: a better future or a more certain one?”. Journal of Planning Education and Research28: 503–517
2.
AlexanderE R (2005) “Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalization theory to institutional design”. Planning Theory4: 209–222
3.
Alden J, Albrechts L, da Rose Pires A, 2001, "In search of new approaches for planning", in The Changing Institutional Landscape of Planning Eds L Albrechts, J Alden, A da Rosa Pires (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–7
4.
BulkeleyH (2000) “Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18: 727–748
5.
Bulkeley H, Schroeder H, Janda K, Zhao J, Armstrong A, Yi Chu S, Ghosh S, 2009, “Cities and climate change: the role of institutions, governance and urban planning”. Report prepared for the World Bank Urban Symposium on Climate Change, World Bank, Geneva
6.
COAG, 2007, “National Climate Change Adaptation Framework”, Council of Australian Governments, Canberra
7.
CortellA PPetersonS (1999) “Altered states: explaining domestic institutional change”. British Journal of Political Science29: 177–203
8.
CSIRO, 2011, “Climate change science and solutions for Australia”, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne
9.
CSIRO, 2012, “State of the Climate Report 2012”, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne
10.
DIP, 2009a South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031 Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Queensland Government, Brisbane
11.
DIP, 2009b Draft South East Queensland Climate Change Management Plan 2009–2031 Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Queensland Government, Brisbane
12.
DSDIP (2012) Temporary State Planning Policy 2/12, Brisbane: Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning
13.
FisherS (2012) “Policy storylines in Indian climate politics: opening new political spaces”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30: 109–127
14.
FlickU (2008) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, London: Sage
15.
ForesterJ (1989) Planning in the Face of Power, Oakland, CA: University of California Press
16.
GarnautR (2008) Garnaut Climate Change Review: Report to the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments of Australia, Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press
17.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
18.
GleesonB (2008) “Waking from the dream: an Australian perspective on urban resilience”. Urban Studies45: 2653–2668
19.
HajerM (1993) “Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain”. In: FischerFForesterJ (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: Routledge, pp. 43–76
20.
HajerM (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Environmental Modernisation and the Policy Process, Oxford: Clarendon Press
21.
HallP ATaylorR (1998) “Political science and three new institutionalisms”. In: SoltanKUslanerE MHauflerV I (eds) Institutions and Social Order, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp 15–43
22.
HealeyP (1998) “Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning”. Environment and Planning A30: 1531–1546
23.
HealeyP (2006) “Transforming governance: challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space”. European Planning Studies14: 299–320
24.
HennessyKFitzharrisBBatesB CHarveyNHowdenS MHughesLSalingerM JWarrickR (2007) “Australia and New Zealand”. In: ParryM LCanzianiO FPalutikofJ Pvan der LindenP JHansonC E (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspp 507–540.
25.
HodgsonG M (2006) “What are institutions?”. Journal of Economic Issues40: 1–25
26.
HoganJ (2006) “Remoulding the critical junctures approach”. Canadian Journal of Political Science39: 657–679
27.
IPCC, 2007 Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
28.
IPCC, 2012 Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
29.
KingstonCCaballeroG (2009), “Comparing theories of institutional change”. Journal of Institutional Economics5: 151–180
30.
LeviM (1990) “A logic of institutional change”. In: CookK SLeviM (eds) The Limits of Rationality, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 402–418
31.
LovellHBulkeleyHOwensS (2009) “Converging agendas? Energy and climate change politics in the UK”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27: 90–109
32.
LowNGleesonBRushE (2003) “Making believe: institutional and discursive barriers to sustainable transport in two Australian cities”. International Planning Studies8: 93–114
33.
MarchJOlsenJ (2005) “Institutional perspectives on political institutions”. Governance9: 247–264
34.
MatthewsT (2012) “Responding to climate change as a transformative stressor through metro-regional planning”. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability17: 1089–1103.
35.
NorthD C (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36.
NorthD C (1993) “Five propositions about institutional change”. In: KnightJSenedI (eds) Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp 15–26
37.
OUM, 2005, South East Queensland Regional Plan 2005–2026, Office of Urban Management, Queensland Government, Brisbane
38.
PattonM (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Thousand Oake, CA: Sage
39.
SarantakosS (2005) Social Research, 3rd. Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan
40.
Schipper E L F, 2007, “Climate change adaptation and development: exploring the linkages”, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich
41.
Steffen W, 2009, “Climate change 2009: faster change and more serious risks”, Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Canberra
42.
SternN (2006) Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, London: HM Treasury
YoungO R (1999) Governance in World Affairs, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
45.
YoungO R (2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
46.
YoungO R (2010) “Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes”. Global Environmental Change20: 378–385
