This paper builds upon literature examining the foreclosing of community interventions to show how a resident-led anti-road-noise campaign in South East England has been framed, managed, and modulated by authorities. We situate the case within wider debates considering dialogical politics. For advocates, this offers the potential for empowerment through nontraditional forums. Others view such trends, most recently expressed as part of the localism agenda, with suspicion. The paper brings together these literatures to analyse the points at which modulation occurs in the community planning process. We describe the types of countertactics residents deployed to deflect the modulation of their demands, and the events that led to the outcome. We find that community planning offers a space—albeit one that is tightly circumscribed—within which (select) groups can effect change. The paper argues that the detail of neighbourhood-scale actions warrant further attention, especially as governmental enthusiasm for dialogical modes of politics shows no sign of abating.
AggerA (2012) “Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance”. Town Planning Review83: 29–45
3.
AlbrechtsL (2003) “Reconstructing decision-making: planning versus politics”. Planning Theory2: 249–268
4.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2010) “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28: 803–818
5.
AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (1998) “Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning”. Environment amd Planning A30: 1975–1990
BaileyN (2003) “Local strategic partnerships in England: the continuing search for collaborative advantage, leadership and strategy in urban governance”. Planning Theory and Practice4: 443–457
8.
BeckU (1994) “The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization”. In: BeckUGiddensALashS (eds) Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–55
9.
BeckU (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press
10.
BishopJ (2010) “From parish plans to localism in England: straight track or long and winding road?”. Planning Practice and Research25: 611–624
11.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode34: 349–379
12.
BrownillS (2009) “The dynamics of participation: modes of governance and increasing participation in planning”. Urban Policy and Research27: 357–375
13.
BurninghamK (1998) “A noisy road or noisy resident? A demonstration of the utility of social constructionism for analysing environmental problems”. The Sociological Review46: 536–563
CallonM (1980) “Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not”. In: KnorrKKrohnRWhitleyR (eds) The Social Process of Scientific InvestigationIVDordrecht: Reidel, pp. 197–219
16.
CallonM (1986) “Some elements of a sociology of translation”. In: LawJ (eds) Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge, pp. 196–223
17.
CallonM (1998) “An essay framing and overflowing”. In: CallonM (eds) The Laws of the Market, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244–269
18.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, Boston, MA: MIT Press
GeddesM (2006) “Partnership and the limits to local governance in England: institutionalist analysis and neoliberalism”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30: 76–97
35.
GiddensA (1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press
36.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPOosterlynckS (2013) “Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality”. Environment and Planning A45: 217–234
37.
HausMHeineltHStewartM (2006) Urban Governance and Democracy, London: Routledge
38.
HochC (2006) “What can Rorty teach an old pragmatist doing public administration or planning?”. Administration and Society38: 389–398
39.
HonigB (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, New York: Cornell University Press
40.
InnesJBooherD (2004) “Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century”. Planning Theory and Practice5: 419–436
41.
MacLeodGRacoMWardK (2003) “Negotiating the contemporary city”. Urban Studies40: 1655–1671
42.
MayT (2008) The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
43.
MetzgerJ (2011) “Neither revolution, nor resignation: re(democratizing) contemporary planning praxis: a commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton’s “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces” ”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29: 191–196
44.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political, London: Routledge
45.
OosterlynckSSwyngedouwE (2010) “Noise reduction: the post-political quandary of night flights at Brussels airport”. Environment and Planning A42: 1577–1594
46.
PaddisonR (2010) “Protest in the park: preliminary thoughts on the silencing of democratic protest in the neoliberal age”. Variant39/40: 20–25
47.
Painter J, Orton A, Macleod G, Dominelli L, Pande R, 2011, “Connecting localism and community empowerment: research review and critical synthesis”, report for the Arts and Humanities Research Council Connected Community Programme, Department of Geography, University of Durham
48.
ParkerG (2008) “Parish and community-led planning”. Town Planning Review79: 61–85
49.
ParkerG (2012) “Neighbourhood planning: precursors, lessons and prospects”. Journal of Planning and Environment Law40: OP139
50.
ParkerGMurrayC (2012) “Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices”. Town Planning Review83: 1–28
51.
ParkerGWraggA (1999) “Networks, agency and (de)stabilization: the issue of navigation on the River Wye, UK”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management42: 471–484
52.
RacoM (2003) “Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region”. Geoforum34: 37–55
53.
RacoMParkerGDoakA (2006) “Reshaping spaces of local governance? Community strategies and the modernisation of local government in England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24: 475–496
54.
RancièreJ (2010) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, New York: Continuum
55.
RootesC (2009) “Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: an introduction”. Environmental Politics18: 817–834
56.
RutlandTAylettA (2008) “The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26: 627–646
57.
SagerT (2009a) “Planners’ role: torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities”. European Planning Studies17: 65–84
58.
SagerT (2009b) “Responsibilities of theorists: the case of communicative planning theory”. Progress in Planning72: 1–51
59.
SilverI (1997) “Constructing ‘social change’ through philanthropy: boundary framing and the articulation of vocabularies of motives for social movement participation”. Sociological Inquiry67: 488–503
60.
StirlingA (2008) “ ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology”. Science, Technology and Human Values33: 262–294
61.
Street E, 2012 (Re)shaping the South Bank: The (Post) Politics of Sustainable Place-making unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College, London
62.
SwyngedouwE (2005) “Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state”. Urban Studies42: 1991–2006
63.
SwyngedouwE (2010) “Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition”. In: CerretaMConcilioGMonnoV (eds) Making Strategies in Spatial Planning Knowledge and Values, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 185–205
64.
TaitM (2002) “Room for manoeuvre? An actor-network study of central-local relations in development plan making”. Planning Theory and Practice3: 69–85
65.
WallD (1999) Earth First! And the Anti-roads Movement, London: Routledge
66.
West Berkshire Council (2011) West Berkshire District Profile 2011, Newbury
67.
WilsonN (2005) “The dark side of community development”. Planning Theory and Practice6: 519–526
68.
ŽižekS (1999) The Ticklish Subject, New York: Verso
