Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism,dialogic politics,and the modulation of community action

Abstract

This paper builds upon literature examining the foreclosing of community interventions to show how a resident-led anti-road-noise campaign in South East England has been framed, managed, and modulated by authorities. We situate the case within wider debates considering dialogical politics. For advocates, this offers the potential for empowerment through nontraditional forums. Others view such trends, most recently expressed as part of the localism agenda, with suspicion. The paper brings together these literatures to analyse the points at which modulation occurs in the community planning process. We describe the types of countertactics residents deployed to deflect the modulation of their demands, and the events that led to the outcome. We find that community planning offers a space—albeit one that is tightly circumscribed—within which (select) groups can effect change. The paper argues that the detail of neighbourhood-scale actions warrant further attention, especially as governmental enthusiasm for dialogical modes of politics shows no sign of abating.

Keywords

planning localism dialogical politics framing modulation translation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACRE (2012) “Community-led planning”. Action with Communities in Rural England. http://www.acre.org.uk/our-work/community-led-planning

Agger

(2012) “Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance”. Town Planning Review 83: 29–45

Albrechts

(2003) “Reconstructing decision-making: planning versus politics”. Planning Theory 2: 249–268

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2010) “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 803–818

Allmendinger

Tewdwr-Jones

(1998) “Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning”. Environment amd Planning A 30: 1975–1990

Allmendinger

Tewdwr-Jones

(2001) Planning Futures, London: Routledge

Bailey

(2003) “Local strategic partnerships in England: the continuing search for collaborative advantage, leadership and strategy in urban governance”. Planning Theory and Practice 4: 443–457

Beck

(1994) “The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization”. In: Beck

Giddens

Lash

(eds) Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–55

Beck

(1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press

10.

Bishop

(2010) “From parish plans to localism in England: straight track or long and winding road?”. Planning Practice and Research 25: 611–624

11.

Brenner

Theodore

(2002) “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode 34: 349–379

12.

Brownill

(2009) “The dynamics of participation: modes of governance and increasing participation in planning”. Urban Policy and Research 27: 357–375

13.

Burningham

(1998) “A noisy road or noisy resident? A demonstration of the utility of social constructionism for analysing environmental problems”. The Sociological Review 46: 536–563

14.

Bylund

(2012) “Post-political correctness?”. Planning Theory 11: 319–327

15.

Callon

(1980) “Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not”. In: Knorr

Krohn

Whitley

(eds) The Social Process of Scientific Investigation IVDordrecht: Reidel, pp. 197–219

16.

Callon

(1986) “Some elements of a sociology of translation”. In: Law

(eds) Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge, pp. 196–223

17.

Callon

(1998) “An essay framing and overflowing”. In: Callon

(eds) The Laws of the Market, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244–269

18.

Callon

Lascoumes

Barthe

(2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, Boston, MA: MIT Press

19.

Cameron D, 2010, “Our ‘big society’ plan”, 31 March, Conservative Party, http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2010/03/David_Cameron_Our_Big_Society_plan.aspx

20.

Cochrane

(2008) Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach, Oxford: Blackwell

21.

Connelly

(2006) “Looking inside public involvement: how is it made so ineffective and can we change this?”. Community Development Journal 41: 13–24

22.

Conservative Party (2010) “Open source planning”, London: DP 14

23.

Crouch

(2004) Post Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press

24.

Curry

(2012) “Sustainable rural development in England: policy problems and equity consequences”. Local Economy 27: 95–102

25.

DCLG (2011a) A Plain English Guide to the Localism Act, London: The Stationery OfficeDepartment for Communities and Local Government

26.

DCLG (2011b) An Introduction to Neighbourhood Planning, London: The Stationery OfficeDepartment for Communities and Local Government

27.

DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework, London: The Stationery Office27 March, Department for Communities and Local Government

28.

Dikeç

(2005) “Space, politics, and the political”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 171–188

29.

Dovey

(1999) Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, London: Routledge

30.

Elkin

(1974) Politics and Land Use Planning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

31.

Elwood

(2004) “Partnerships and participation: reconfiguring urban governance in different state contexts”. Urban Geographer 25: 755–770

32.

Flyvbjerg

(1998) Rationality and Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

33.

Gallent

Robinson

(2012) Neighbourhood Planning: Communities, Networks and Governance, Bristol: Policy Press

34.

Geddes

(2006) “Partnership and the limits to local governance in England: institutionalist analysis and neoliberalism”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30: 76–97

35.

Giddens

(1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press

36.

Haughton

Allmendinger

Oosterlynck

(2013) “Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal governmentality”. Environment and Planning A 45: 217–234

37.

Haus

Heinelt

Stewart

(2006) Urban Governance and Democracy, London: Routledge

38.

Hoch

(2006) “What can Rorty teach an old pragmatist doing public administration or planning?”. Administration and Society 38: 389–398

39.

Honig

(1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, New York: Cornell University Press

40.

Innes

Booher

(2004) “Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century”. Planning Theory and Practice 5: 419–436

41.

MacLeod

Raco

Ward

(2003) “Negotiating the contemporary city”. Urban Studies 40: 1655–1671

42.

May

(2008) The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

43.

Metzger

(2011) “Neither revolution, nor resignation: re(democratizing) contemporary planning praxis: a commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton’s “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces” ”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29: 191–196

44.

Mouffe

(2005) On the Political, London: Routledge

45.

Oosterlynck

Swyngedouw

(2010) “Noise reduction: the post-political quandary of night flights at Brussels airport”. Environment and Planning A 42: 1577–1594

46.

Paddison

(2010) “Protest in the park: preliminary thoughts on the silencing of democratic protest in the neoliberal age”. Variant 39/40: 20–25

47.

Painter J, Orton A, Macleod G, Dominelli L, Pande R, 2011, “Connecting localism and community empowerment: research review and critical synthesis”, report for the Arts and Humanities Research Council Connected Community Programme, Department of Geography, University of Durham

48.

Parker

(2008) “Parish and community-led planning”. Town Planning Review 79: 61–85

49.

Parker

(2012) “Neighbourhood planning: precursors, lessons and prospects”. Journal of Planning and Environment Law 40: OP139

50.

Parker

Murray

(2012) “Beyond tokenism? Community-led planning and rational choices”. Town Planning Review 83: 1–28

51.

Parker

Wragg

(1999) “Networks, agency and (de)stabilization: the issue of navigation on the River Wye, UK”. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 471–484

52.

Raco

(2003) “Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region”. Geoforum 34: 37–55

53.

Raco

Parker

Doak

(2006) “Reshaping spaces of local governance? Community strategies and the modernisation of local government in England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24: 475–496

54.

Rancière

(2010) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, New York: Continuum

55.

Rootes

(2009) “Environmental movements, waste and waste infrastructure: an introduction”. Environmental Politics 18: 817–834

56.

Rutland

Aylett

(2008) “The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 627–646

57.

Sager

(2009a) “Planners’ role: torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities”. European Planning Studies 17: 65–84

58.

Sager

(2009b) “Responsibilities of theorists: the case of communicative planning theory”. Progress in Planning 72: 1–51

59.

Silver

(1997) “Constructing ‘social change’ through philanthropy: boundary framing and the articulation of vocabularies of motives for social movement participation”. Sociological Inquiry 67: 488–503

60.

Stirling

(2008) “ ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology”. Science, Technology and Human Values 33: 262–294

61.

Street E, 2012 (Re)shaping the South Bank: The (Post) Politics of Sustainable Place-making unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College, London

62.

Swyngedouw

(2005) “Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state”. Urban Studies 42: 1991–2006

63.

Swyngedouw

(2010) “Impossible sustainability and the post-political condition”. In: Cerreta

Concilio

Monno

(eds) Making Strategies in Spatial Planning Knowledge and Values, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 185–205

64.

Tait

(2002) “Room for manoeuvre? An actor-network study of central-local relations in development plan making”. Planning Theory and Practice 3: 69–85

65.

Wall

(1999) Earth First! And the Anti-roads Movement, London: Routledge

66.

West Berkshire Council (2011) West Berkshire District Profile 2011, Newbury

67.

Wilson

(2005) “The dark side of community development”. Planning Theory and Practice 6: 519–526

68.

Žižek

(1999) The Ticklish Subject, New York: Verso