The primary focus is on three aspects of regional policy that have tended to be taken for granted in the past. To set the discussion in context, several important background issues are examined. Of the three neglected aspects to be considered here, the first explores the bases or justifications for regional policy and the implications of these. Important in this connection are the possible trade-offs between efficiency and equity. A second aspect deals with the various modes of intervention in regional policy, and a distinction is drawn between direct or conventional regional policy and indirect regional policy, the latter not generally being thought of as regional in character. The third neglected aspect is concerned with the varying extent to which space is accorded an importance in regional policy. Attention is directed to a situation where the question of space has been given inadequate treatment, and also to a case where it has exerted a predominant influence. This leads on to a consideration of the ‘competition’ between space-based and space-neutral emphases of present development strategies, starting with the place prosperity versus people prosperity debate.
AlesinaASpolaoreE, 2005The Size of Nations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
AlesinaACozziGMantovanN, 2012, “The evolution of ideology, fairness and redistribution”Economic Journal1221244–1261
3.
AllenJMasseyDCochraneA, 1998Rethinking the Region (Routledge, London)
4.
ArmstrongH W, 1997, “Regional-level jurisdictions and economic regulation”, in Regional Governance and Economic Development Eds DansonM WLloydM G, (Pion, London) pp 27–46
5.
ArmstrongHTaylorJ, 1978Regional Economic Policy and its Analysis (Philip Allan, Oxford)
6.
BarcaF, 2009, “An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations” (European Commission, Brussels)
7.
BarcaFMcCannPRodríguez-PoseA, 2012, “The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches”Journal of Regional Science52134–152
8.
BeckmannM J, 1968Location Theory (Random House, New York)
9.
BelliniNDansonMHalkierH, (Eds), 2012Regional Development Agencies: The Next Generation? Networking, Knowledge and Regional Policies (Routledge, Abingdon)
10.
MartínezJ A Belso, 2009, “Entrepreneurship policy and new business performance and growth: An empirical analysis based on manufacturing industries”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27195–215
11.
BennettR, 2008, “SME policy support in Britain since the 1990s: What have we learnt?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26375–397
12.
BoltonR, 1992, “Place prosperity vs. ‘people prosperity’ revisited: An old issue with a new angle”Urban Studies29185–203
13.
BuddL, 1997, “Regional integration and convergence and problems of fiscal and monetary systems: Some lessons for Eastern Europe”Regional Studies31559–570
14.
CameronG C, 1977, “Re-examining the case for federal involvement in the market economy after a prosperous decade”Explorations in Economic Research4375–389
15.
ChinitzB, 1961, “Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh”American Economic Review (Proceedings)51279–287
16.
DansonMLloydG, 2012, “Devolution, institutions, and organisations: Changing models of regional development agencies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy3078–94
17.
DavoudiS, 2007, “Territorial cohesion, the European social model, and spatial policy research”, in Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society Ed. FaludiA, (The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) pp 81–104
18.
DührS, 2003, “Illustrating spatial policies in Europe”European Planning Studies11929–948
19.
EC, European Commision, Brussels1977Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration.
20.
EC, European Commision, Brussels1999European Spatial Planning: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development in the Territory of the EU.
21.
EC, European Commision, Brussels2010Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth.
22.
FaggioGOvermanH, 2012, “The effect of public sector employment on local labour markets”, DP 111, Spatial Economics Research Centre, London School of Economics
23.
FaroleTRodríguez-PoseAStorperM, 2011, “Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions”Journal of Common Market Studies491089–1111
24.
FirnJ R, 1975, “External control and regional development: The case of Scotland”Environment and Planning A7393–414
25.
FriedmannJ, 1956, “The concept of a planning region”Land Economics321–13
26.
GillI, 2010Regional Development Policies: Place-based or People-centred? (OECD, Paris)
27.
GlaeserE LRosenthalS SStrangeW C, 2010, “Urban economics and entrepreneurship”Journal of Urban Economics671–14
28.
GoetzS JPartridgeM DRickmanD SMajumdarS, 2011, “Sharing the gains of local economic development: Race-to-the-top versus race-to-the-bottom economic development”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29428–456
29.
GordonI, 2011, “London: Capital of boom and bust?”, paper presented to the Urban and Regional Economics Seminar Group, Open University, London
30.
GoreC, 1984Regions in Question: Space, Development Theory and Regional Policy (Methuen, London)
31.
GrossmanE, 2006, “Europeanization as an interactive process: German Banks meet EU State Aid Policy”Journal of Common Market Studies44325–348
32.
HealeyP, 1997, “The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe”, in Making Strategic Spatial Plans Eds HealyPKhakeeAMotteANeedhamB, (UCL Press, London) pp 3–19
33.
HealeyP, 2004, “The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2845–67
34.
HenryCHillFLeitchC, 2003, “Developing a coherent enterprise support policy: A new challenge for governments”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy213–19
35.
HirschmanA O, 1958The Strategy of Economic Development (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
36.
HooverE M, 1971An Introduction to Regional Economics (Alfred A Knopf, New York)
37.
HooverE MFisherJ L, 1949, “Research in regional economic growth”, in Problems in the Study of Economic Growth (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York) pp 173–250
38.
House of Commons Expenditure Committee, 1973Regional Development Incentives: Minutes of Evidence House of Commons Paper 127 (HMSO, London)
39.
IssermanA M, 1994, “State economic development policy and practice: An American perspective”International Regional Science Review1649–100
40.
IssermanA M, 2002, “Defining regions for rural America”, in The New Power of Regions: A Policy Focus for Rural America (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, KS) pp 35–54
41.
IssermanA MFeserEWarrenD E, 2009, “Why some rural places prosper and others do not”International Regional Science Review32300–342
42.
KlaassenL H, 1967Methods of Selecting Industries for Depressed Areas (OECD, Paris)
43.
LevenC, 1964, “Establishing goals for regional development”Journal of the American Institute of Planners30100–110
44.
LöschA, 1954 (1944) Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft2nd edition (Gustav Fischer, Jena) translated by WoglomW HStolperW F, as The Economics of Location (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
45.
McCallumJ D, 1979, “The development of British regional policy”, in Regional Policy: Past Experience And New Directions, Eds MaclennanDParrJ B, (Martin Robertson, Oxford) pp 3–41
46.
McCannP, 2009, “Globalization, multinationals and the BRIICS countries”, in Globalization and Emerging Economies (OECD, Paris) pp 78–124
47.
MartinRSunleyP, 2006, “Path dependence and regional economic evolution”Journal of Economic Geography7573–601
48.
MasonCBrownR, 2013, “Creating good public policy to support high growth firms”Small Business Economics40211–225
49.
MennesL BTinbergenJWaardenburgJ G, 1969The Element of Space in Development Planning (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
50.
MeyerJ R, 1963, “Regional economics: A survey”American Economic Review5319–54
51.
Ministry of Labour, 1928Report of the Industrial Transference Board Cmd 3156 (HMSO, London)
52.
MoseleyM J, 1974Growth Centres in Spatial Planning (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
53.
MyrdalG, 1957Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (Duckworth, London)
54.
NorthD C, 1955, “Location theory and regional economic growth”Journal of Political Economy63243–258
55.
NorthD C, 1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
OhlinB, 1933Interregional and International Trade (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
58.
PapanexG F, 1962, “The development of entrepreneurship”American Economic Review5246–58
59.
ParrJ B, 1999, “Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning. Part 2: Implementation and outcome”Urban Studies361195–1215
60.
ParrJ B, 2002, “Missing elements in the analysis of agglomeration economies”International Regional Science Review25151–168
61.
ParrJ B, 2004, “The polycentric urban region: A closer inspection”Regional Studies38231–240
62.
ParrJ B, 2005, “Spatial planning: Too little or too much?”Scienze Regionali4113–129
63.
PorterM E, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York)
64.
PriemusH, 2002, “Spatial-economic investment policy and urban regeneration in the Netherlands”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy20775–790
65.
RichardsonH W, 1978Regional and Urban Economics (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middx)
66.
RichardsonH W, 1979, “Aggregate efficiency and interregional equity”, in Spatial Inequalities and Regional Development Eds FolmerHOosterhavenJ, (Martinus and Nijhoff, The Hague) pp 161–183
67.
Rodríguez-PoseAEzcurraR, 2009, “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis”Journal of Economic Geography10619–644
68.
RodwinL, 1963, “Choosing regions for development”, in Public Policy: A Yearbook of the Harvard University Graduate School of Public Administration, Volume 12 Eds FriedrichC JHarrisS E, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 141–162
69.
RodwinL, 1970Nations and Cities: A Comparison of Strategies for Urban Growth (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
70.
RosenthalS SStrangeW C, 2003, “Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics: Cities and Geography Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F, (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 2119–2179
71.
SapirAAghionPBertolaGHellwigMPisani-FerryJRosatiDViñalsJWallaceH, 2004An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
72.
StoreyD JGreeneF, 2010Small Business and Enterprise (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, CA)
73.
StorperM, 1995, “The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies”European Urban and Regional Studies2191–221
74.
StorperM, 2010, “Agglomeration, trade, and spatial development: Bringing dynamics back in”Journal of Regional Science50313–342
75.
SwalesJ K, 1997, “A cost-benefit approach to the evaluation of regional selective assistance”Fiscal Studies1873–85
76.
Tewdwr-JonesMGallentNMorphetJ, 2010, “An anatomy of spatial planning: Coming to terms with the spatial element in UK planning”European Planning Studies18239–257
77.
van OortF G, 2010, “Spatial and sectoral effects of agglomeration economies”Papers in Regional Science865–30
78.
WelliszS, 1960, “Economic planning in the Netherlands, France and Italy”Journal of Political Economy68252–283
79.
WilsonT, 1964Policies for Regional Development (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh)
80.
WinnickL, 1966, “Place prosperity vs. people prosperity: Welfare considerations in the geographical redistribution of economic activity”, in Essays in Urban Land Economics (Real Estate Research Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA) pp 273–283
81.
World Bank, 2009, “Commission on growth and development. Growth report: Strategies for sustained growth and inclusive deveopment”, Washington, DC
82.
WrenC, 2009, “Onward the spatial: An essay on the nature and relevance of regional economics”Spatial Economic Analysis4447–465
