Financing School-Based Education in England: Poverty,Examination Results,and Expenditure

Abstract

The authors examine two main research issues. First, they focus on the way in which funds for education are targeted on disadvantage at the level of the local education authority (LEA). They explore the relationship between various indicators of disadvantage and national test and public examination results and find that the relationship between one measure of disadvantage—the proportion of children dependent on Income Support recipients in an LEA—has a stronger negative relationship with examination results of that LEA than the additional educational needs (AEN) index currently used by central government in the formula to distribute resources to local authorities. Second, the authors focus on the relationship between expenditure and performance and find evidence that higher expenditure by LEAs on education is associated with better examination results once poverty (as measured by the Income Support measure) has been controlled for. The first finding suggests that targeting educational need could be improved by substituting the Income Support measure for the current AEN index; the second lends support to the use of increased expenditure as a means of combating educational disadvantage.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Audit Commission, 1993 Passing the Bucks: The Impact of Standard Spending Assessments on Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness, Volume 1 Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales (The Stationery Office, London)

Bramley

, 1989, “A model of educational outcomes at local authority level, with implications for local expenditure needs” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 7 39–58

DES, 1984, “School standards and spending: statistical analysis”, statistical bulletin 13/84, Department of Education and Science; now Department for Education and Employment, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1 3BT

DETR, 1998, “Chapter 2: education SSA”, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET; http://www.local.doe.gov.uk/finance/ssa/9900/subgroup/ch2.pdf

DfEE, 1999, “Autumn package”, Department for Education and Employment, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1 3BT; http://performance.realtime.co.uk/html/KS4_sec1b_09.html

DoE, 1990, “Standard spending assessments: background and underlying methodology”, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET

Finn

Achilles

, 1990, “Answers and questions about class size: a statewide experiment” American Educational Research Journal 27 557–577

Gillborn

Gipps

, 1996, “Recent research on the achievements of ethnic minority pupils”, Office for Standards in Education, Alexandra House, 33 Kingsway, London WC2B 6SE

Goldstein

, 1994, “The use of regression analysis for resource allocation by central government” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 12 15–21

10.

Hanushek

E A

, 1998, “Conclusions and controversies about effectiveness of school resources” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 4(1) 11–25

11.

Jesson

Mayston

, 1995, “Value for money in education: updating statistical bulletin 13/84”, Department for Education and Employment, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1 3BT

12.

Levačić

Hardman

, 1998, “Competing for resources: the impact of social disadvantage and other factors on English secondary schools' financial performance” Oxford Review of Education 24(3) 303–327

13.

Mayston

D J

, 1996, “Educational attainment and resource use: mystery or econometric mystification?” Education Economics 4(2) 127–142

14.

Odden

A R

Picus

L O

, 1992 School Finance (McGraw-Hill, New York)

15.

Sammons

, 1999 School Effectiveness: Coming of Age in the Twenty-First Century (Swets and Zeitlinger, Abingdon, Oxon)

16.

Sparkes

, 1999, “Schools, education and social exclusion”, CASE paper 29, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE), London School of Economics and Political Science, London

17.

Tabachnick

B G

Fidell

L S

, 1996 Using Multivariate Statistics 3rd edition (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)

18.

West

Pennell

, 1995, “The financing of school-based education: changing the Additional Educational Needs Allowance” Education Economics 3(3) 265–275

19.

West

Pennell

West

Travers

, 1999, “The financing of school-based education: main findings”, Clare Market Paper 15, Centre for Educational Research, London School of Economics and Political Science, London

20.

West

Pennell

West

Travers

, 2000a, “Financing school-based education in England: principles and problems”, in Managing Finance and Resources in Education Eds Coleman

Anderson

(Paul Chapman, London) pp 59 – 80

21.

West

Pennell

West

, 2000b, “New Labour and school-based education in England: changing the system of funding?” British Educational Research Journal 26(4) 523–526