In this paper the influence of macrosocietal shifts on municipal reforms in metropolitan areas, as reflected by the cyclic swing from periods of increased efforts to rationalize metropolitan governance to periods of acceptance and promotion of a fragmented pattern, is demonstrated. An analogy between the changes in industrial organization and municipal organization is suggested. The paper is focused on Israel's economic core region—the Tel Aviv metropolis—with surveys of reports of commissions dealing with municipal reforms and of boundary commissions assessing claims for municipal boundary changes between 1960 and 1993. A unique feature of Tel Aviv is the region's past failure to implement proposals for major rationalization during a period when such reforms were common in countries with similar political systems. This failure was a result of specific political and geographical factors that counterbalanced the broad processes that supported reform. The subsequent period of economic stagnation weakened prospects for comprehensive reforms. Renewed growth in the 1990s has intensified pressures for municipal change but has not been associated with the comeback of old notions of metropolitan government. Rather, flexible modes of cooperation and coordination appear to be preferred, priority being given to reorganizing local government in the urban—rural fringes of the metropolis rather than dealing with the inner parts of the metropolis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdrianC RPressC, 1977Governing Urban America (McGraw-Hill, New York)
2.
AmiranD H KShacharA, 1961, “The towns of Israel: The principles of their urban geography”Geographical Review51348–369
3.
BarlowI M, 1981Spatial Dimensions of Urban Government (Research Studies Press, Chichester, Sussex)
4.
BarlowI M, 1991Metropolitan Government (Routledge, London)
5.
BennettR (Ed.), 1989Territory and Administration in Europe (Frances Pinter, London)
6.
BrutzkusE, 1977, “Municipal reform in the Ono region, an opinion”, unpublished (in Hebrew); copy available from author
7.
EfratE, 1984Urbanization in Israel (Croom Helm, London)
8.
ElazarDKalchheimC (Eds), 1988Local Government in Israel (University Press of America, Lanham, MD)
9.
GolaniYEldorSGaronM (Eds), 1992Planning and Housing in Israel in the Wake of Rapid ChangesR&L Creative Communications, Tel Aviv, for Ministry of Interior and Ministry of Construction and Housing, Jerusalem
10.
GradusYRazinEKrakoverS, 1993The Industrial Geography of Israel (Routledge, London)
11.
GunlicksA B (Ed.), 1981Local Government Reform and Reorganization: An International Perspective (Kennikat Press, Port Washington, NY)
12.
HamptonW, 1991Local Government and Urban Politics (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
13.
HassonSRazinE, 1990, “What is hidden behind a municipal boundary conflict?”Political Geography Quarterly9267–283
14.
HavardW CCortyF L, 1964Rural—Urban Consolidation: The Merger of Governments in the Baton Rouge Area (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, LA)
15.
IIURI, 1973, “Municipal reform for the Gush Dan Cities”, Israeli Institute for Urban Research and Information, submitted to the Ministry of Interior, Ramat Gan (in Hebrew)
16.
McKayD, 1983, “Local government in the USA”, in Local Democracies Eds BowmanMHamptonW (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne) pp 125–142
MartinJ A, 1993, “In fits and starts: The Twin Cities metropolitan framework”, in Metropolitan Governance: American/Canadian Intergovernmental Perspectives Eds RothblattD NSanctonA (Institute of Governmental Studies Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 205–243
19.
MillwardHDickeyS, 1994, “Industrial decentralization and the planned industrial park: A case study of metropolitan Halifax”, in The Changing Canadian Metropolis: A Public Policy Perspective, Volume 2 Ed. FriskenF (Institute of Governmental Studies Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 751–776
20.
MoI, 1984Municipal Ordinance (New Version)Ministry of Interior, Jerusalem 91061 (in Hebrew)
21.
MoI, 1990, “A report of the commission of inquiry to the boundaries of the municipalities of Petah Tiqwa and Ramat Gan and the local councils Givat Shmuel, Ganei Tiqwa and Qiryat Ono”, unpublished, Ministry of Interior, Jerusalem 91061 (in Hebrew)
22.
MoI, 1993, “A report of the commission of inquiry for the merger of the cities of Lod and Ramla”, unpublished, Ministry of Interior, Jerusalem 91061 (in Hebrew)
23.
MorlanR L, 1981, “Territorial reorganization and administrative reform in Denmark”, in Local Government Reform and Reorganization: An International Perspective Ed. GunlicksA B (Kennikat Press, Port Washington, NY) pp 31–41
24.
MorrillE L, 1991, “Myths about the metropolis”, in Our Changing Cities Ed. HartJ F (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 1–11
25.
NunnSRosentraubM S, 1993, “Frontiers and development in urban areas”, Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
26.
O'LearyB, 1987, “Why was the GLC abolished?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research11193–217
27.
ParkinA, 1982Governing the Cities: The Australian Experience in Perspective (Macmillan, South Melbourne)
28.
ParkinsonMEvansR, 1990, “Urban development corporations”, in Local Economic Policy Ed. CampbellM (Cassell, London) pp 65–84
29.
ParksR BOakersonR J, 1989, “St Louis: The ACIR study”Intergovernmental Perspective159–11
30.
RazinE, 1990, “Urban economic development in a period of local initiative: Competition among towns in Israel's southern coastal plain”Urban Studies27685–703
31.
RazinEHassonS, 1994, “Urban—rural boundary conflicts: The reshaping of Israel's rural map”Journal of Rural Studies1047–59
32.
RazinEHazanA, 1995, “Industrial development and municipal reorganization: Conflict, cooperation, and regional effects”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy13297–314
33.
RowatD C (Ed.), 1980International Handbook on Local Government Reorganization (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)
34.
SanctonA, 1991aLocal Government Reorganization in Canada Since 1975 (Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research Press, Toronto)
35.
SanctonA, 1991b, “The municipal role in the governance of Canadian cities”, in Canadian Cities in Transition Eds BuntingTFilionP (Oxford University Press, Toronto) pp 462–486
36.
SanctonA, 1992, “Canada as a highly urbanized nation: Implications for government”Canadian Public Administration35281–298
37.
SCLGI, 1981, “Local government in Israel—a report”, State Commission on Local Government Issues, Jerusaleum
38.
ScottA J, 1988Metropolis (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
39.
ScottA JPaulA S, 1990, “Collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations: The technopoles of Southern California”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy8179–193
40.
ShacharA, 1994, “Randstad Holand: A ‘world city’?”Urban Studies31381–400
41.
ShacharAAlonYYardeniZ, 1976, “Municipal reform in the Ono region”, report of the experts' commission (in Hebrew); Ministry of Interior, Jerusalem
42.
StorperMScottA J, 1989, “The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes”, in The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Eds WolchJDearM (Unwin Hyman, Winchester, MA) pp 21–40
43.
TieboutC, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditures”Journal of Political Economy64416–424
44.
WolpertJ, 1991, “The costs of regional growth”, in Our Changing Cities Ed. HartJ F (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 170–188
