In this paper the determinants of the adoption of new technology are explored by using data obtained from a 1993 survey of 299 manufacturing establishments in the state of West Virginia. The authors examine the use of twenty hardware-based and organizational new manufacturing technologies, aggregate use of technology, and plans for future use of technology. Multivariate regression analyses indicate that larger, export-oriented, branch plants that manufacture products in long production runs, and plants that are located in counties with a sizeable manufacturing sector adopt more new technologies than do other types of plants. The results also suggest that there is a role for further government policy in encouraging plant modernization. Although participation in a state technology-assistance program is not yet associated with higher aggregate levels of use of new technology, it is found to be associated with the adoption of specific technologies and receptivity to investment in new technology. The results of the study also confirm the value of training and suggest that a strategy of targeting smaller and medium-sized plants with services focused on multiple clustered locations may be effective in stimulating the use of new technology among these manufacturers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldermanNDaviesS, 1990, “Modelling regional patterns of innovation diffusion in the UK metalworking industries”Regional Studies24513–528
2.
AldermanNFischerM M, 1992, “Innovation and techological change: An Austrian - British comparison”Environment and Planning A24273–288
3.
AntonelliC, 1990, “Induced adoption and externalities in the regional diffusion of information technology”Regional Studies2431–40
4.
AppoldS JGantJ P, 1993, “Agglomeration and plant-level technological change”, paper presented at the 40th Annual North American Regional Science Association Meetings, Houston, TX, 12–14 November; copy available from John Heinz III, School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
5.
ARPA, 1993, “Technology reinvestment project. Program information package”, Advanced Research Project Agency, US Department of Defense, Arlington, VA
6.
BenvignatiA M, 1982, “Interfirm adoption of capital-goods innovations”Review of Economics and Statistics64330–335
7.
BerglundDCoburnC, 1995Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Technology Programs (Batelle Press, Columbus, OH)
8.
BesantJ R, 1982, “Influential factors in manufacturing innovation”Research Policy11117–132
9.
BragaHWillmoreL, 1991, “Technological imports and technological effort: An analysis of their determinants in Brazilian firms”Journal of Industrial Economics394421–4432
10.
BrittonJ N H, 1991, “Reconsidering innovation policy for small and medium sized enterprises: The Canadian case”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9189–206
11.
BrownL A, 1981Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
12.
BruggerE AStuckeyB, 1987, “Regional economic structure and innovative behavior in Switzerland”Regional Studies21241–254
13.
CapelloRNijkampP, 1993, “Industrial and regional variations in consumption network externalities”, paper presented at the North American Regional Science Association Meetings, Houston, TX, 12–14 November; copy available from Dipartimento di Economia e Produzione, Politecnico di Milano, Milano
14.
CarterCWilliamsB, 1957Industry and Technical Progress (Oxford University Press, New York)
15.
CassJBirnbaumM, 1991Comparative Guide to American Colleges (HarperCollins, New York)
16.
CliftonD SEdensL RJohnsonH TSpringfieldR W, 1989, “Elements of an effective technology assistance policy to stimulate economic development”Economic Development Quarterly352–57
17.
DavelaarE JNijkampP, 1989, “Spatial dispersion of technological innovation: A case study for the Netherlands by means of partial least squares”Journal of Regional Science29325–346
18.
DaviesS, 1979The Diffusion of Process Innovations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
19.
DieperinkHNijkampP, 1988, “Innovative behavior, agglomeration economies and R&D infrastructure”Empirical Economics1335–57
20.
DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL, 1988Technical Change and Economic Theory (Frances Pinter, London)
21.
EisingerP, 1988The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United States (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
22.
FellerI, 1992, “American state governments as models for national science policy”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management11288–309
23.
FogartyM SLeeJ C, 1991, “A manufacturing industry cluster approach to technology deployment”, Center for Regional Economic Issues, Case Western Research University, Cleveland, OH
24.
FriedmanD, 1988The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in Japan (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
25.
GilderG, 1989Microcosm: The Quantum Revolution in Economics and Technology (Simon and Schuster, New York)
26.
GilliesJ AKruzichR, 1988, “The transfer of advanced manufacturing technologies to eastern Kentucky industries”, Mountain Association for Community Economic Development Inc, Berea, KY
27.
GlasmeierA, 1991The High Tech Potential: Ecoomic Development in Rural America (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ)
28.
GlobermanS, 1975, “Technological diffusion in the Canadian tool and die industry”Review of Economics and Statistics57428–434
29.
HansenN, 1991, “Factories in Danish fields: How high-wage, flexible production has succeeded in peripheral Jutland”International Regional Science Review14(2) 109–132
30.
Harris, 1993West Virginia Manufacturing Directory (Harris Inc., Twinsburg, OH)
31.
HicksD A, 1986, “Industrial renewal through technology upgrading in the US metalworking industry”, in Technology, Regions, and Policy Ed. ReesJ, (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ) pp 218–248
32.
ITI, 1987, “Frostbelt automation: The ITI status report on Great Lakes manufacturing”, Industrial Technology Institute, Ann Arbor, MI
33.
JaikumarR, 1986, “Postindustrial manufacturing”Harvard Business Review (November–December) 69–76
34.
JangSNorsworthyJ R, 1992, “Technology adoption in US manufacturing: A comparison of foreign-associated and domestic plants”, WP-92-1, Center for Science and Technology Policy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
35.
KelleyM RBrooksH, 1988, “The state of computerized automation in US manufacturing”, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA)
36.
KelleyM RBrooksH, 1991, “External learning opportunities and the diffusion of process innovations to small firms”Technological Forecasting and Social Change39103–125
37.
KraftK, 1989, “Market structure, firm characteristics, and innovative activity”Journal of Industrial Economics37329–336
38.
LeBrasseurRNasierowskiW, 1991, “Training and the application of computer-based technology: The case of Ontario manufacturing”Technological Forecasting and Social Change40371–388
39.
MacPhersonA D, 1988, “Industrial innovation in the small business sector: Empirical evidence from metropolitan Toronto”Environment and Planning A20953–971
40.
MacPhersonA D, 1992, “Innovation, external technical linkages and small firm commercial performance: An empirical analysis from western New York”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development4165–183
41.
MansfieldE, 1963, “The speed of response of firms to new techniques”Quarterly Journal of Economics77290–311
42.
MansfieldERapaportJRomeoAVillaniEWagnerSHusicF, 1977The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology (W W Norton, New York)
43.
MarshallJ NAldermanNWongCThwaitesA, 1993, “The impact of government-assisted management training and development on small and medium-sized enterprises in Britain”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy11331–348
44.
NCACT, 1995, “Making manufacturing and technology work for North Carolina”, North Carolina Alliance for Competitive Technologies, Research Triangle Park, NC
45.
NIST, 1995, “Manufacturing extension partnership: Making a difference for America's manufacturers”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD
46.
NRC, 1993Learning to Change: Opportunities to Improve the Performance of Smaller ManufacturersNational Research Council (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
47.
OakeyR PO'FarrellP N, 1992, “The regional extent of computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine tool adoption and post adoption success in small British mechanical engineering firms”Regional Studies26163–175
48.
OldsmanE, 1994, “An evaluation of the Industrial Technology Extension Service”, report to the New York State Science and Technology Foundation; copy available from by Nexus Associates, Belmont, MA
49.
OsborneDGaeblerT, 1992Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
50.
OstrowieckiBLoomisWSpeersMTornatzkyL, 1992, “Technology needs in four sectors: A field study of MMTC client companies”, report to the Midwest Manufacturing Technology Center, Ann Arbor, MI; copy available from Industrial Technology Institute, Ann Arbor, MI
51.
PioreM JSabelC F, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
52.
ReesJBriggsROakeyR, 1984, “The adoption of new technology in the American machinery industry”Regional Studies18489–504
53.
RephannTShapiraP, 1994, “Survey of technology use in West Virginia manufacturing”, RP-9401, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
54.
RogersE M, 1962Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press, New York)
55.
RomeoA A, 1975, “Interindustry and interfirm differences in the rate of diffusion of an innovation”Review of Economics and Statistics57311–319
56.
RosenfeldS, 1992Competitive Manufacturing: New Strategies for Regional Development (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ)
57.
SengenbergerWLovemanGPioreM, (Eds), 1990The Re-emergence of Small Enterprises: Industrial Restructuring in Industrialised Countries (International Institute for Labor Studies, Geneva)
58.
ShapiraP, 1990, “Modern times: Learning from state initiatives in industrial extension and technology transfer”Economic Development Quarterly4186–202
59.
ShapiraPGeigerM, 1990, “Modernization in the mountains? The diffusion of industrial technology in West Virginia manufacturing”, WP-9007, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
60.
ShapiraPRoessnerJ DBarkeR, 1995, “Public infrastructures for industrial modernization in the United States”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development763–84
61.
ShapiraPYoutieJRoessnerJ D, 1996, “Current practices in the evaluation of U.S. industrial modernization programs”Research Policy25185–214
62.
SimonsG R, 1993, “Industrial extension and innovation”, in Empowering Technology: Implementing a US Strategy Ed. BranscombL M, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 167–201
63.
StonemanP, 1983The Economic Analysis of Technological Change (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
64.
StorperM, 1993, “Regional ‘worlds’ of production: Learning and innovation in the technology districts of France, Italy, and the USA”Regional Studies27433–455
65.
SweeneyG P, 1987Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development (St Martin's Press, New York)
66.
TödtlingF, 1991, “Spatial differentiation of innovation—locational and structural factors: Results of an Austrian study”, in Regions Reconsidered Eds BergmanEMaierGTödtlingF, (Mansell, London) pp 215–239
67.
TödtlingF, 1992, “Technological change at the regional level: The role of location, firm structure, and strategy”Environment and Planning A241565–1584
USDA, 1987Rural – Urban Continuum CodeUS Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC
70.
USDC, 1989Current Industrial Reports, Manufacturing Technology 1988US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
71.
USDC, 1992County Business PatternsUS Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
72.
USDC, 1993aCounty and City Data BookUS Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
73.
USDC, 1993b“Regional economic information system”, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC
74.
USDT, 1987, “Highway performance monitoring system”, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
75.
USGAO, 1991, “US efforts to enhance the competitiveness of small manufacturers”, GAO/RCED-92-30, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC
76.
USGAO, 1995, “Manufacturing extension programs: Manufacturers' views of services”, GAO/GGD-95-216BR, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC
77.
UtterbackJ, 1974, “Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology”Science183620–626
78.
YariyamJKraybillD S, 1993, “Small firms' choice of business strategies”Southern Economic Journal60136–145
79.
WalkerRGreenstreetD, 1991, “The effect of government incentives and assistance on location and job growth in manufacturing”Regional Studies2415–30
80.
WiardaE, 1989, “Fixing what's broke where it counts: Agglomeration in the core industrial economy”TechnEcon1(2) 1–13
81.
WozniakG, 1987, “Human capital, information, and the early adoption of new technology”Journal of Human Resources22101–112
82.
YoungR CFrancisJ DYoungC H, 1993, “Innovation, high-technology use, and flexibility in small manufacturing firms”Growth and Change2467–86
83.
YoutieJShapiraPRoessnerJ D, 1995Manufacturing Assistance Program Needs Assessment Guide. Volume 1: Regional Needs Assessment Approaches (Aspen Institute, Washington, DC)
