In the last twenty-five years the European Union (EU) has gradually developed an international, albeit ambiguous, identity that has greatly enhanced its leadership role in the international environmental arena. The leadership offered by the EU has been largely shaped by its unique institutional structure, but also by such factors as the changing nature of international environmental issues. In this essay we contrast the traditional role of the United States with that of the EU in global climate change negotiations and comment on the future role of both actors in the international environmental arena. An understanding of the institutional structures of the EU and the changing nature of international environmental issues helps to explain the EU's ascendant role as a leader in multilateral environmental politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenedickR E, 1991Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
BrinkhorstL J, 1994, “The European Community at UNCED: lessons to be drawn for the future”, in Institutional Dynamics of European Integration Eds CurtinDHeukelsT (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht) pp 609–618
3.
CohenR, 1992Washington at Work: Back Rooms and Clean Air (Macmillan, New York)
4.
CollierU, 1996, “The European Union's climate change policy: limiting emissions or limiting powers?”Journal of European Public Policy3122–138
5.
CossS, 1998, “Split over tax plan easts doubt on Kyoto targets”European Voice 18 December 7 January 1998, page 1
6.
Cutter, 1997a, “EU ‘set to stabilize’ climate emissions”Environment Watch: Western EuropeCutter Information Corporation6(19) 1
7.
Cutter, 1997b, “EU to review national climate emissions limits following Kyoto Protocol Accord”Environment Watch: Western EuropeCutter Information Corporation6(24) 3
8.
Cutter, 1997c, “EU leaders order environmental integration strategy”Environment Watch: Western EuropeCutter Information Corporation6(24) 19
9.
Cutter, 1998a, “Commission to encourage EU governments to go beyond Kyoto”Environment Watch: Western EuropeCutter Information Corporation7(6) 1
10.
Cutter, 1998b, “EU ministers cautious over renewables commitment”Environment Watch: Western EuropeCutter Information Corporation7(10) 4
11.
DGXI, 1997, Press Release, DN:IP/97/1106, 12 November, Directorate-General XI (Environment), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
12.
European Commission, 1997European Economy number 3, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
13.
European Environment Council, 1998, Press Release Information #2106, Document 9402/98 (Presse 205), Council of Ministers, Luxemburg
14.
GrubbM, 1991Energy Policies and the Greenhouse Effect. Volume 2: Country Studies and Technical Options (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
15.
HaighN, 1996, “Climate change policies and politics in the European Community”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJagerJ (Routledge, London) pp 155–185
16.
HellerT, 1998, “The path to EU climate change policy”, in Global Competition and EU Environmental Policy Ed. GolubJ (Routledge, London) pp 108–141
17.
HeritierAKnillCMingersS, 1996Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State. Britain, France, Germany (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin)
18.
JachtenfuchsMHuberM, 1993, “Institutional learning in the European Community: the response to the greenhouse effect”, in European Integration and Environmental Policy Eds LiefferinkJ DLoweP DMolA P J (Belhaven Press, London) pp 36–58
19.
JordanA, 1999a, “The construction of a multilevel environmental governance system”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy171–17
20.
JordanA, 1999b, “The implementation of EU environmental policy: a policy problem without a political solution?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1769–90
21.
JupilleCaporasoJ, 1998, “States, agency and rules: the European Community in global environmental politics”, in The European Union in the World Community Ed. RhodesC (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 213–239
22.
KnillC, 1998, “European policies: the impact of national administrative traditions”Journal of Public Policy181–28
23.
KnillCLenschowA, 1997, “Perceiving Europe: patterns of administrative change in British and German environmental policy”, paper prepared for the workshop on “Europeanization and Domestic Structural Change”, Pittsburgh, 7–9 November; copy available from the Center for West European Studies, 4E01 Forbes Quadrangle, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
24.
LeenenA T S, 1984, “Participation of the EEC in international environmental agreements”, in Legal Issues of European Integration 1984/1 special issue: “The European Communities as an International Organization” (Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands) pp 93–111
25.
LitfinK, 1993, “Ecoregimes: playing tug of war with the national state”, in The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics Eds LipschutzR DConcaK (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 94–117
26.
MacroryRHessionM, 1996, “The European Community and climate change: the role of law and legal competence”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJagerJ (Routledge, London) pp 106–154
27.
McGowanF, 1996, “Energy policy”, in The European Union and National Industrial Policy Eds KassimHMenonA (Routledge, London) pp 132–152
28.
NollkaemperA, 1987, “The European Community and international environmental cooperation — legal aspects of external community powers”, in Legal Issues of European Integration: Law Review of the Europa Institut, University of Amsterdam (Kluwer, Deventer, the Netherlands) 1987/2, pp 55–91
29.
OECD, 1997OECD in Figures, 1997 (OECD, Paris)
30.
O'KeefeDSchermersH G (Eds), 1983Mixed Agreements (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, the Netherlands)
31.
PehleH, 1997, “Germany: domestic obstacles to an international front-runner”, in European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers Eds Skou AndersonMLiefferinkD (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 161–209
RowlandsI H, 1992, “The international politics of global environmental change”, in Global Environmental Change and International Relations Eds RowlandsI HGreeneM (Macmillan, London) pp 19–37
34.
SbragiaA, 1998, “Institution-building from below and from above: the European Community in global environmental politics”, in Supranational Governance: The Institutionalization of the European Union Eds StoneASandholtzW (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 283–303
35.
SbragiaA with HildebrandP, 1998, “The European Union: a story in the making”, in Engaging Countries: Compliance with International Environmental Agreements Eds Brown WeissEJacobsonH (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 215–252
36.
SchoenbaumT J, 1997, “International trade and protection of the environment: the continuing search for reconciliation”The American Journal of International Law91268–313
37.
SchönD AReinM, 1994Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (Basic Books, New York)
38.
SoroosM S, 1994, “From Stockholm to Rio: the evolution of global environmental governance”, in Environmental Policy in the 1990s: Toward a New Agenda2nd edition, Eds VigN JKraftM E (Congressional Quarterly, Washington, DC) pp 299–321
39.
VernonR, 1995, “The triad as policymakers”Shaping National Responses to Climate Change: A Post-Rio Guide Ed LeeH (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 147–176
40.
VogelD, 1997Barriers or Benefits? Regulation in Translantic Trade (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
41.
von MoltkeKRahmanA, 1996, “External perspectives on climate change: a view from the United States and the Third World”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJagerJ (Routledge, London) pp 330–345
42.
WCED, 1987Our Common Future (Brundtland Report), World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
43.
ZitoA R, 1999, “Task expansion: a theoretical review”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1719–35
