The task force has emerged as a mechanism for coordinating economic development activity in the context of the current New Labour government's emphasis upon including ‘stakeholders’ in ‘joined-up’ approaches to ‘crosscutting’ issues. In this paper I examine the use of task forces to organise economic development at employer, sectoral, and territorial levels at the local and regional scales in the North East region of England. It is argued that New Labour's experimental use of task forces reflects a particular mediation of more general tendencies in the historical evolution of state modernisation, which varies in particular and contingent ways at the local and regional levels. The research reveals the continued importance of the existing public-sector and public—private-sector institutions, the less significant and contingent role of the private sector, and the contribution of the task force to the ‘quasi-governance’ of the United Kingdom, with its problems of coordination, transparency, and accountability. A renewed politics of economic development governance is required to establish the accountability and legitimacy of such bodies in the context of the emergent multilayered governance system of the UK political economy.
AndersonJ, 1995, “The exaggerated death of the nation state”, in A Global World? Re-ordering Political Space Eds AndersonJBrookCCochraneA (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 65112
3.
BarkerTByrneIVeallA, 1999Ruling by Task Force (Politico's and Democratic Audit, London)
4.
BennettRPayneD, 2000Local and Regional Economic Development: Negotiating Power Under Labour (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
5.
BennettKBeynonHHudsonR, 2000Regenerating the Coalfields (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York)
6.
BergerSDoreR (Eds), 1996National Diversity and Global Capitalism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
7.
BlockF, 1994, “The roles of the state in the economy”, in The Handbook of Economic Sociology Eds SmelserNJSwedbergR (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 691710
8.
BoyerRDracheD, 1996States Against Markets (Routledge, London)
HabermasJ, 1999, “The European nation state and the pressures of globalisation”New Left Review number 235, 4659
24.
HeldDMcGrewAGoldblattDPerratonJ, 1999Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Polity Press, Cambridge)
25.
HeywoodS, 2000, “Regeneration of city issues ‘fully covered’”The Journal 23 June, page 12
26.
HirstPThompsonG, 1999Globalisation in Question2nd edition (Polity Press, Cambridge)
27.
HodgsonG, 1999Economics and Utopia (Routledge, London)
28.
House of Commons, 2001Mapping the Quango State Fifth Report Select Committee on Public Administration HC367-II (The Stationery Office, London)
29.
HudsonR, 1998, “Restructuring region and state: The case of northeast England”Tidschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie891530
30.
HuttonW, 1999The Stakeholding Society (Polity Press, Cambridge)
31.
JessopB, 1997, “Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance”Review of International Political Economy4561581
32.
KeatingMBoyleR, 1987Remaking Urban Scotland (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
33.
LeadbetterCMulganG, 1997, “Lean democracy and the leadership vacuum”, in Life After Politics Ed. MulganG (Fontana, London) pp 246259
34.
LindleyPD, 1985, “The Merseyside task force”Regional Studies196974
35.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘New Regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal for Urban and Regional Research23379395
36.
McElweeM, 2000The Great and the Good? The Rise of the New Class (Centre for Policy Studies, London)
37.
McKieD, 2000, “Taskforces are dead and buried”The Guardian 1 September, page 16
38.
MacLeodL, 1998The Task Force Revolution: A Guide to Task Forces and Advisory Groups Under the New Labour GovernmentCranfield Partnership Unit for the Industry Forum, Cranfield University, Bedford
39.
MartinR, 1999, “Institutionalist approaches in economic geography”, in Companion to Economic Geography Eds BarnesTSheppardE (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 128
40.
MartinRSunleyP, 1997, “The post-Keynesian state and the space economy”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ (Arnold, London) pp 278289
41.
MatherG, 2000Making Decisions in Britain (European Policy Forum, London)
42.
MawsonJ, 1999, “Area regeneration policy—management problems”, paper for Institutional Capacity, Social Capital and Urban Governance Seminar, The County Thistle Hotel, Newcastle upon Tyne, 15–16 April; copy available from the author, Warwick Institute of Governance and Public Management, University of Warwick, Coventry
43.
MichieJSmithGrieve J (Eds), 1995Managing the Global Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
44.
MorganKRobertsE, 1993The Democratic Deficit: A Guide to Quangoland (University of Wales College of Cardiff, Cardiff)
45.
MullanJ, 2001, “Whitehall warriors”The Guardian 15 March
46.
NairnT, 2000After Britain (Granta, London)
47.
OffeC, 1975, “The theory of the capitalist state and the problem of policy formulation”, in Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism Eds LindbergLNAlfordRCrouchCOffeC (D C Heath, Lexington, MA) pp 245259
48.
O'NeillP, 1997, “Bringing the qualitative state into economic geography”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ (Arnold, London) pp 290301
49.
PeckJ, 1999, “Editorial: Grey geography?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24131135
50.
PeckJTickellA, 1994, “Searching for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global—local disorder”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 280315
51.
Performance and Innovation Unit, 2000Reaching Out: The Role of Central Government at Regional and Local Level (Cabinet Office, London)
52.
PikeA, 1999a, “The politics of factory closures and task forces in the North East of England”Regional Studies33567575
53.
PikeA, 1999b, “South Tyneside Redundancies—Rapid Response Group”, report for South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne; copy available from the author
54.
PikeA, 2001, “Reflections on the task force model in economic development”Local Economy1687102
55.
PikeAJonesIDawleyS, 1998, “The textiles and clothing crisis in the northern region”, report for the GMB Northern, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne; copy available from the author
56.
PlattS, 1998, “Government by task force”, Catalyst Paper 2, The Catalyst Trust Ltd, PO Box 27477, London SW9 8WT
57.
RobinsonFShawK, 2000Who Runs the North… Now?Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham, Durham
58.
HollingsworthRogers JBoyerR, 1997Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
59.
Scottish Executive, 2001Review of Public Bodies (Scottish Executive, Edinburgh)
60.
StewartM, 1999, “Policy reflections on joined-up working”, paper for Institutional Capacity, Social Capital and Urban Governance Seminar, The County Thistle Hotel, Newcastle upon Tyne, 15–16 April; copy available from the author, Cities Research Centre, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol
61.
SkelcherCWeirSWilsonL, 2000Advance of the Quango State (Local Government Information Unit, London)
62.
TomaneyJ, 2000, “End of the empire state? New Labour and devolution in the United Kingdom”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24675688
63.
TurnerA, 2001Just Capital: The Liberal Economy (Macmillan, London)
64.
Urban Task Force, 1998Towards an Urban RenaissanceDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU
