ATV-DVWK, 2000Die Elbe und ihre Nebenflüsse—Belastung, Trends, Bewertung, Perspektiven [The Elbe River Basin and its tributaries—pollution, trends, assessment, perspectives]German Association of Water Management, Sewage Water and Waste, Hennef.
2.
BergstromJ CBoyleK JPoeG L, 2001The Economic Value of Water Quality (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
3.
BirchSGafniA, 1992, “Cost effectiveness/utility analysis—do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be?”Journal of Health Economics11279–296.
4.
BMU, 1998Wasserwirtschaft in Deutschland [Water Management in Germany]German Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Reactor Security, Bonn.
5.
BMU, 2005Water Framework Directive—Summary of River Basin District Analysis 2004 in GermanyGerman Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Reactor Security, Berlin.
BriggsA HO'BrienB J, 2001, “The death of cost minimization analysis?”Health Economics10179–184.
8.
BrockD W, 2003, “Separate spheres and indirect benefits”Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation online journal, open access 1(4).
9.
BrouwerRPearceD, 2005Cost–Benefit Analysis and Water Resources Management (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
10.
BrouwerW B FKoopmanschapM A, 2000, “On the economic foundation of CEA. Ladies and Gentlemen, take your positions!”Journal of Health Economics19439–459.
11.
BurgessJClarkJHarrisonC M, 2000, “Culture, communication, and the information problem in contingent valuation surveys: A case study of a Wildlife Enhancement Scheme”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18505–524.
12.
CEC, 2000, “Die Preisgestaltung als politisches Instrument zur Forderung eines nachhaltigen Umgangs mit Wasserressourcen” [Water prices as political instrument to support sustainable use of water], communication of the EC Commission to the EC Council, the EC Parliament and the Social and Economic Council, KOM, 2000, 477, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
13.
DEFRA, 2005, “Water Framework Directive—Summary Reports of the Article 5 analysis to the Commission in March 2005”, overview and pdf versions of all reports, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/water/wfd/article5/.
14.
De MarchiBFuntowiczS OLo CascioSMundaG, 2000, “Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation: An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily”Ecological Economics34267–282.
15.
DeSarioJLangtonS, 1987Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making (Greenwood Press, New York).
16.
DrummondM FLudbrookALowsonKSteeleA, 1986Studies in Economic Appraisal in Health Care, Volume 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
17.
EEA, 2003, “Status of Europe's water”, EEA Briefing 1/2003, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
18.
El-SwaifyS AYakowitzD S, (Eds), 1996Multiple Objective Decision Making for Land, Water, and Environmental Management (Lewis, Boca Raton, FL).
19.
EvansD BHurleyS F, 1995, “The application of economic evaluation techniques in the health sector: The state of the art”Journal of International Development7503–524.
20.
FeachemR, 1986, “Preventing diarrhoea: What are the policy options?”Health Policy and Planning1109–117.
21.
GarberA MPhelpsC E, 1997, “Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis”Journal of Health Economics161–31.
22.
GowdyJ M, 2004, “The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental evaluation and policy”Land Economics80239–257.
23.
HanleyNSpashC L, 1993Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos).
24.
HuttonG, 2001, “Economic evaluation and priority setting in water and sanitation interventions”, in Water Quality: Guidelines, Standards and Health Eds FewtrellLBartramJ, (IWA Publishing, London) pp 333–359.
InterwiesEKraemerR AKranzNGörlachBDworakTBorchardtDRichterSWilleckeJ, 2004Basic Principles for Selecting the Most Cost-effective Combinations of Measures for Inclusion in the Programme of Measures as Described in Article 11 of the Water Framework Directive—Handbook Environmental RR 20221210, UBA-FB 000563/E, UBA-texts 24/04, German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Berlin.
27.
JohannessonMJönssenP OKarlssonF, 1996, “Outcome measurement in economic evaluation: Health economics5279–296.
28.
KeeneyR LRaiffaH, 1976Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs (John Wiley, New York).
29.
KneeseA VBowerB T, 1968Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC).
30.
KnetschJ L, 1994, “Environmental valuation: Some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers”Environmental Values3351–368.
31.
KrabbeP F MEssink-BotM LBonselG J, 1997, “The comparability and reliability of five health state valuation methods”Social Science and Medicine451641–1652.
32.
LevinH M, 1995, “Cost-effectiveness analysis”, in International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education2nd edition (Pergamon Press, Oxford) pp 381–386.
33.
Martinez-AlierJMundaGO'NeillJ, 1998, “Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics”Ecological Economics26277–286.
34.
MessnerFZwirnerOKarkuschkeM, 2006, “Participation in multicriteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River Basin”Land Use Policy2363–75.
35.
MitchellR CCarsonR T, 1989Existence Values for Groundwater Protection draft final report to USEPA (Resources for the Future, Washington DC).
36.
MundaG, 1995Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications (Physika, Heidelberg).
37.
NiemeyerSSpashC L, 2001, “Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: A critical appraisal”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19567–585.
38.
O'NeillJSpashC L, 2000, “Conceptions of value in environmental decision-making”Environmental Values9521–536.
39.
OsborneL LWileyM J, 1986, “Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed”Journal of Environmental Management269–27.
40.
RauschmayerFWittmerH, 2004, “Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts”Land Use Policy23108–122.
41.
RennOWeblerTWiedemannP, 1995, “A need for discourse on citizen participation: Objectives and structure of the book”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP, (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 1–15.
WATECO, 2002Guidance Document and Annexes CIS Working Group 2.6 on Water and Economics, Brussels.
51.
WeblerT, 1995, “‘Right’ discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP, (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 35–86.
52.
YoungR A, 2005, “Economic criteria for water allocation and valuation”, in Cost–Benefit Analysis and Water Resources Management Eds BrouwerRPearceD, (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 13–45.