We examine the reasons why a US locality would voluntarily commit to the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) campaign. Using geographic information systems analytic techniques, we map and measure a locality's vulnerability to climate-change impacts at the county level of spatial precision. We analyze multiple measures of climate-change vulnerability, including expected temperature change, extreme weather events, and coastal proximity, as well as economic variables, demographic variables, and civic-participation variables that constitute a locality's socioeconomic capacity to commit to costly climate-change policy initiatives. Bivariate and logistic regression results indicate that CCP-committed localities are quantitatively different to noncommitted localities on both climate-change risk and socioeconomic-capacity dimensions. On vulnerability measures, the odds of CCP-campaign participation increase significantly with the number of people killed and injured by extreme weather events, projected temperature change, and coastal proximity. On socioeconomic-capacity measures, the odds of CCP-campaign involvement increase with the percentage of citizens that vote Democrat and recycle, as well as the number of nonprofit organizations with an environment focus. The odds decrease in a county area as the percentage of the labor force employed in carbon-intensive industries increases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BetsillM, 2000, “Localizing global climate change: Controlling greenhouse gas emissions in US cities”, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, John F Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA
2.
BetsillM, 2001, “Mitigating climate change in U.S. cities: Opportunities and obstacles”Local Environment4393–406
3.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2004, “Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program”International Studies Quarterly48471–493
4.
BetsillMBulkeleyH, 2005, “Rethinking sustainable cities: Multi-level governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change”Environmental Politics1442–63
5.
CollierULofstedtR, 1997, “Think globally, act locally? Local climate change and energy policies in Sweden and the UK”Global Environmental Change725–40
6.
De LeoG ARizziLCaizziAGattoM, 2001, “The economic benefits of the Kyoto Protocol”Nature413478–479
7.
DietzTOstromESternP C, 2003, “The struggle to govern the commons”Science3021907–1912
8.
EdmondsJ ESandsR D, 2003, “What are the costs of limiting CO2 concentrations?”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economic, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ M (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 140–186
9.
EPA, 1999Air Data County Emissions Report (Environment Protection Agency, Washington, DC)
10.
GoulderL H, 2003, “Benefit–cost analysis and climate-change policy”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economic, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ M (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 67–91
11.
GriffinJ M, 2003Global Climate Change: The Science, Economics, and Politics (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
12.
HardinG, 1968, “The tragedy of the commons”Science1621243–1248
13.
HurdB HCallawayJ M, with SmithJ BKirshenP, 2004, “Climatic change and U.S. water resources: From modeled watershed impacts to national estimates”Journal of the American Water Resources Association40(1) 129–148
14.
ICLEI, 2005, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, http://www.iclei.org/
15.
JaegerCDurrenbergerGKastenholzHTrufferB, 1993, “Determinants of environmental action with regard to climatic change”Climatic Change23193–211
16.
LubellMVedlitzAZahranSAlstonL T, 2006, “Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy”Political Research Quarterly59(1) 149–160
17.
LubellMZahranSVedlitzA, 2007, “Collective action and citizen response to global warming”Political Behavior29391–413
18.
MendelsohnR, 2003, “Assessing the market damages from climate change”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economics, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ M (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 92–113
19.
MendelsohnRNordhausWShawD, 1994, “The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis”American Economic Review84753–771
20.
MendelsohnRMorrisonWSchlesingerMAndrovaN, 2000, “Country-specific market impacts from climate change”Climatic Change45553–569
21.
NorthG R, 2003, “Climate change over the next century”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economics, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ M (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 45–66
22.
O'ConnorR EBordR JFisherA, 1999, “Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change”Risk Analysis19461–471
23.
O'ConnorR EBordR JYarnalBWiefekN, 2002, “Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?”Social Science Quarterly831–17
OlsonM, 1971The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
26.
OreskesN, 2004, “Beyond the ivory tower: The scientific consensus on climate change”Science3061686
27.
ParryMArnellNMcMichaelTNichollsRMartensPKovatsSLivermoreMRosenweigCIglesiasAFischerG, 2001, “Millions at risk: Defining critical climate change threats and targets”Global Environmental Change11181–183
28.
PickvanceC, 2002, “Settlement type and local government environmental policy in Hungary: The role of local economic structure and local government resources”European Environment1290–104
RappaportJSachsJ, 2003, “The United States as a coastal nation”Journal of Economic Growth85–46
31.
Rollings-MagnussonSMagnussonR C, 2000, “Kyoto protocol: Implications of a flawed but important environmental policy”Canadian Public Policy26347–359
32.
RydinY, 1999, “Governance for sustainable urban development: A European model?”Local Environment461–66
33.
RydinYPenningtonM, 2000, “Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital”Local Environment5153–169
SaporitoG, 1992, “Global warming: Local governments take the lead”Public Management710–13
36.
ScheragaJ DGrambschA E, 1998, “Risks, opportunities, and adaptation to climate change”Climate Research1085–95
37.
SmithJ BLazoJHurdB H, 2003, “The difficulties of estimating global non-market damages from climate change”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economics, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 114–139
38.
StrengersY, 2004, “Environmental culture change in local government: A practiced perspective from the international council for local environmental initiatives—Australia/New Zealand”Local Environment9621–628
39.
TitusJ G, 1986, “Greenhouse effect, sea level rise, and coastal zone management”Coastal Zone Management Journal14147–171
40.
TitusJ G, 1998, “Rising sea, coastal erosion, and the takings clause: How to save wetland and beaches without hurting property owners”Maryland Law Review571279–1399
41.
United States Census Bureau, 2000Census of Population and Housing: Summary Tape Files 1 & 3 (US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC)
42.
Van KootenG C, 2003, “Smoke and mirrors: The Kyoto Protocol and beyond”Canadian Public Policy: Analyse de Politiques29397–415
43.
VictorD G, 2003, “International agreements and the struggle to tame carbon”, in Global Climate Change: The Science, Economic, and Politics Ed. GriffinJ M (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) pp 204–229
44.
WatsonR T, 2001Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
45.
WatsonR TZinyoweraM CMossR H, 1997The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability: A Special Report of IPCC Working Group II (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
46.
WhiteR, 2004, “Managing and interpreting uncertainty for climate change risk”Building Research and Information32438–448
47.
ZahranSBrodyS DVedlitzAGroverH, 2006, “Climate change vulnerability and policy support”Society and Natural Resources19771–789
48.
ZahranSKimEChenXLubellM, 2006, “Ecological development and global climate change: A cross-national study of Kyoto Protocol ratification”Society and Natural Resources2037–55
