Health fears arising from the presence of high-voltage power lines in residential areas have received recent attention in spatial planning. A study of stances taken by planning authorities in England and Wales shows their willingness to give expression to the concerns of local communities through precautionary measures, and the difficulties encountered in the face of official statements and industry opposition. These attempts to embody local feeling in patterns of development are illustrative of the increasing prevalence of a sense of risk in contemporary society. The spatial patterns of risk are also revealed, which owe much to the presence and distribution of industrial infrastructure in the landscape and to the associated contested use of land.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aylesbury Vale District Council, 1998Aylesbury Vale District Local Plan: Deposit DraftAylesbury Vale District Council, 66 High Street, Aylesbury, Bucks HP20 1SD
2.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London)
3.
Bridgend County Borough Council, 2001Unitary Development Plan DepositBridgend County Borough Council, Civic Offices, Angel Street, Bridgend CF31 4WB
4.
BurgessA, 2004Cellular Phones, Public Fears and a Culture of Precaution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
5.
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council, 1994Colderdale Unitary Development Plan Inspector's ReportCalderdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Town Hall, Crossley Street, Halifax HX1 1UJ
6.
City and County of Swansea, 1998Swansea Local Plan: Inspector's ReportCity and County of Swansea, County Hall, Oystermouth Road, Swansea SA1 3SN
7.
City of Lincoln Council, 1997The City of Lincoln Local Plan: Inspector's Report of ObjectionsCity of Lincoln Council, City Hall, Beaumont Fee, Lincoln LN1 1DD
CowellR, 2002The Scope for Undergrounding Overhead Electricity Lines: A Report by UK CEED for Friends of the Lake DistrictUK CEED, UK Centre for Economic and Environmental Development, 48 Broadway, Peterborough PE1 1SB
10.
DavoudiS, 2000, “Sustainability: a new vision for the British planning system”Planning Perspectives15123–137
11.
De MerrittL, 1990Siting of Power Lines and Communication Towers: A Bibliography on the Potential Health Effects of Electric and Magnetic FieldsMunicipal Research and Services Center of Washington, 2601 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121–1280
12.
DETR, 1999Planning Policy Guidance Note 12: Development Plans Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
13.
DETR, DoH, 1998Land Use Planning and Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs): Consultation DraftDepartment of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Department of Health, London
14.
FurbyLSlovicPFischhoffBGregoryR, 1988, “Public perceptions of electric power transmission lines”Journal of Environmental Psychology819–43
15.
FurtadoRSoaresFBezerraJDacontiJ, 2000, “The incorporation of environmental costs into the planning of a power system interconnection in Brazil” paper 37-111, CIGRÉ, 21 rue d'Artois, 75008 Paris
16.
GiddensA, 1990The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
17.
GoldblattD, 1999, “Risk society and the environment”, in Thinking Through the Environment: A Reader Ed SmithM (Open University Press, Milton Keynes) pp 373–382
18.
GoultyG, 1990Visual Amenity Aspects of High Voltage Transmission (Research Studies Press, Baldock, Herts)
19.
HansenA (Ed.), 1993The Mass Media and Environmental Issues (Leicester University Press, Leicester)
20.
HarremoësPGeeDMacGarvinMStirlingAKeysJWynneBVazS (Eds), 2002The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings (Earthscan, London)
ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection), 1998, “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)”Health Physics74494–522
23.
IEGMP, 2000Mobile Phones and Health The Stewart Report, Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones, Didcot
24.
JayS, 2004, “The forces shaping local planning policy on high voltage electricity installations”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning6207–226
25.
JaySWoodC, 2002, “The emergence of local planning authority policy on high voltage electricity issues”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning4261–214
26.
KaspersonJKaspersonRPidgeonNSlovicP, 2003, “The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory”, in The Social Amplification of Risk Eds PidgeonNKaspersonRSlovicP (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 13–46
27.
LGA, 1999, “LGA response to draft advice to local planning authorities on land-use planning and development giving rise to electromagnetic fields”, unpublished, Local Government Association, Local Government House, Smith Square, London SW1P 3HZ
28.
LomasCJacksonRSpeedG, 1996, “Integrating overhead lines into an environmentally sensitive world” paper 22-206, CIGRE, 21 rue d'Artois, 75008 Paris
29.
London Borough of Merton, 2001London Borough of Merton Council UDP: Public Local Inquiry 2001: Response ProofLondon Borough of Merton, Civic Centre, London Road, Merton SM4 5DX
30.
LuckinB, 1990Questions of Power: Electricity and Environment in Inter-war Britain (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
31.
Mendip District Council, 1998Mendip District Local Plan: Deposit DraftMendip District Council, Cannards Grave Road, Shepton Mallett, Somerset BA4 5BT
32.
MerrittJJonesP, 2000, “Science and environmental decision making: the social context”, in Science and Environmental Decision Making Eds HuxhamMSumnerD (Prentice-Hall, Harlow, Essex) pp 63–93
33.
National Grid, 1999Objection to Policy NE21, Chester-le-Street Public Local InquiryNational Grid Company, Leatherhead
34.
National Grid, 2004A Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for Development near High Voltage Overhead LinesNational Grid Transco, Warwick
35.
NRPB, National Radiological Protection Board, Didcot1993Restrictions on Human Exposure to Static and Time Varying Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation: Scientific Basis and Recommendations for the Implementation of the Board's StatementNRPB4 (5) 7–63
36.
NRPB, National Radiological Protection Board, Didcot19991998 ICNIRP Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz): NRPB Advice on Aspects of Implementation in the UKNRPB10 (2), 3–8
37.
NRPB, National Radiological Protection Board, Didcot2001Report of an Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation: ELF Electromagnetic Fields and the Risk of CancerNRPB12 (1)
38.
NRPB, National Radiological Protection Board, Didcot2003Proposals for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields consultation document
39.
Ogwr Borough Council, 1996Development Brief for Broadlands, South West Bridgend Ogwr Borough Council; now Bridgend County Borough Council, Civic Offices, Angel Street, Bridgend CF31 4WB
40.
OosterveerP, 2002, “Reinventing risk politics: reflexive modernity and the European BSE crisis”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning4215–229
41.
PidgeonNKaspersonRSlovicP (Eds), 2003The Social Amplification of Risk (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
UK CEED, 1991“Undergrounding overhead power lines: final report to the Countryside Commission”, unpublished, UK Centre for Economic and Environmental Development, 48 Broadway, Peterborough PE1 1SB
44.
WalkerG, 2001, “Risk, land use planning and major accident hazards”, in Planning and Environmental Protection: A Review of Law and Policy Ed. MillerC (Hart Publishing, Oxford) pp 69–89
45.
WertheimerNLeeperE, 1979, “Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer”American Journal of Epidemiology109273–284
46.
WHO, 2000Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Cautionary Policies (World Health Organization, Geneva)
47.
WynneB, 1996, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert — lay knowledge divide”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSSzerszynskiBWynneB (Sage, London) pp 44–83
