The author addresses the recent proliferation of cross-border regions, or ‘Euroregions’, in Europe. It is argued that EU multilevel governance patterns generate opportunities for entrepreneurial policy organisations to attract policy tasks and resources. This is conceptualised as policy entrepreneurship and applied to a comparative case-study analysis of three Euroregions: EUREGIO (Germany – Netherlands), Viadrina (Poland – Germany), and Tyrol Euroregion (Austria – Italy). The analysis focuses on the ability of these initiatives to establish themselves as autonomous organisations. It finds considerable variation across the cases in this respect. Following on from this, the paper shows how administrative and institutional environments in different EU member states affect the ability of Euroregions to engage in policy entrepreneurship. It is concluded that it is premature to perceive Euroregions as new types of regional territorial entities; rather, they are part of the policy-innovation scenario enabled by EU multilevel governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckJ, 1997Netzwerke in der transnationalen Regionalpolitik: Rahmenbedingungen, Funktionsweise, Folgen (Nomos, Baden-Baden)
2.
BenzAEberleinB, 1999, “The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance”Journal of European Public Policy6329–348
3.
BlatterJ K, 2001, “Debordering the world of states: towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America; insights from border regions”European Journal of International Relations7175–209
4.
BrennerN, 1999, “Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union”Urban Studies36431–451
5.
BrouardS, 1996, “L'Arc Atlantique comme entreprise politique: coopération inter-régionale et leadership politique”, in Les politiques du néo-régionalisme Ed. BalmeR (Economica, Paris) 41–68
6.
Brunet-JaillyE, 2004, “Comparing local cross-border relations under the EU and NAFTA”Canadian-American Public Policy581–59
7.
CarminJHicksBBeckmannA, 2003. “Leveraging local action—grassroots initiatives and transboundary collaboration in the formation of the White Carpathian Euroregion”International Sociology18703–725
8.
ChurchAReidP, 1999, “Cross-border co-operation, institutionalization and political space across the English Channel”Regional Studies33643–655
9.
CochraneAPeckJTickellA, 1996, “Manchester plays games: exploring the local politics of globalisation”Urban Studies331319–1336
10.
CoE, 19721. Europäisches Symposium der Grenzregionen. Die Zusammenarbeit europäischer Grenzgebiete (Council of Europe, Strassbourg)
11.
CohenM DMarchJ GOlsenJ P, 1972, “A garbage-can model of organizational choice”Administrative Science Quarterly171–25
12.
ConzelmannT, 1998, “‘Europeanisation’ of regional development policies? Linking the multi-level governance approach with theories of policy learning and policy change”European Integration online Papers2(4), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1998-004a.htm
13.
DiMaggioP JPowellW W, 1983, “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”American Sociological Review48147–160
14.
EisenhardtK M, 1989, “Building theories from case study research”Academy of Management Review14532–550
15.
GabbeJ, 1985, “EUREGIO: regionale grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit auf kommunaler Ebene”, in Staatsgrenzen überschreitende Zusammenarbeit des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Ed. Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung (ILS, Dortmund) pp 90–98
16.
GrixJKnowlesV, 2003, “The Euroregion and maximisation of social capital: Pro Europa Viadrina”, in New Borders for a Changing Europe: Cross-border Cooperation and Governance Eds AndersonJO'DowdLThomasM W (Frank Cass, London) pp 154–176
17.
HeineltH, 1996, “Perspektiven und Probleme der Strukturfondsförderung”, in Politiknetzwerke und europäische Strukturfondsförderung Ed. HeineltH (Leske+Budrich, Opladen) pp 298–308
18.
HeineltHSmithR (Eds), 1996Policy Networks and European Structural Funds (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
19.
HoogheL (Ed.), 1996Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-level Governance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
20.
HoogheLMarksG, 2003, “Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance”American Political Science Review97233–243
21.
JessopB, 2002, “The political economy of scale”, in Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-border Regions Eds PerkmannMSumN-L (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 25–49
22.
JessopB, 2004, “The European Union and recent transformations in statehood”, in The State of Europe: Transformations of Statehood from a European Perspective Eds RiekmannS PMokreMLatzerM (Campus, Frankfurt am Main) pp 75–94
23.
KingdonJ W, 1984Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Little, Brown, Boston, MA)
24.
LaffanB, 1997, “From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission”Journal of European Public Policy4422–438
25.
LiberdaE, 1996Regionalentwicklung in Grenzregionen: eine Euregio als Regionalentwicklungsstrategie? (Passavia, Passau)
26.
LuveràB, 1996Oltre il confine. Regionalismo europeo e nuovi nazionalismi in Trentino-Alto Adige (Il Mulino, Bologna)
27.
McCarthyJ DZaldM N, 1977, “Resource mobilization and social movements”American Journal of Sociology821212–1241
28.
MajoneGTameC, 1996Regulating Europe (Routledge, London)
29.
MarchJ GOlsenJ P, 1984, “The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life”The American Political Science Review78734–749
30.
MarksG, 1996, “Exploring and explaining variation in EU cohesion policy”, in Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-level Governance Ed. HoogheL (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 388–422
31.
MintromM, 1997, “Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation”American Journal of Political Science41738–770
MoravcsikA, 1999, “New statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation”International Organization53267–306
34.
O'DowdL, 2003, “The changing significance of European borders”, in New Borders for a Changing Europe: Cross-border Cooperation and Governance Eds AndersonJO'DowdLWilsonT M (Frank Cass, London) pp 13–36
35.
OlsonM, 1965The Logic of Collective Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
36.
PerkmannM, 2003, “Cross-border regions in Europe. Significance and drivers of cross-border co-operation”European Urban and Regional Studies10153–171
37.
PerkmannM, 2007, “The emergence of new scales. A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region”Regional Studies41(4)
38.
PerkmannMSpicerA, 2007, “Healing the scars of history: projects skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship”Organization Studies28(7) forthcoming
39.
RobertsN CKingP J, 1996Transforming Public Policy: Dynamics of Policy Entrepreneurship and Innovation (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
40.
ScottJ W, 1998, “Planning cooperation and transboundary regionalism: implementing policies for European border regions in the German – Polish context”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy16605–624
41.
ScottJ W, 1999, “European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism”Regional Studies33605–618
42.
SidawayJ D, 2001, “Rebuilding bridges: a critical geopolitics of Iberian transfrontier cooperation in a European context”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19743–778
43.
SmyrlM E, 1997, “Does European community regional policy empower the regions?”Governance10287–309
44.
SpeiserB, 1993Europa am Oberrhein (Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel)
45.
SumN-L, 2002, “Rearticulation of spatial scales and temporal horizons of a cross-border mode of growth: the (re)making of Greater China”, in Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-border Regions Eds PerkmannMSumN-L (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 151–175
46.
TömmelI, 1994Staatliche Regulierung und europäische Integration: die Regionalpolitik der EG und ihre Implementation in Italien (Nomos, Baden-Baden)
47.
ToniattiR, 1997, “La bozza di statuto della Regione europea”, in Europaregion Tirol. Rechtliche Voraussetzungen und Schranken der Institutionalisierung Eds PernthalerPOrtinoS (Autonome Region Trentino-Südtirol, Bozen) pp 17–38
48.
VoelzkowH, 1995, “Die Regionalisierung der Strukturpolitik und neue Formen einer intermediären Interessensvermittlung”, in Steuerungseffekte und Legitimation regionaler Netzwerke Ed. KilperH (Institut Arbeit und Technik, Gelsenkirchen) pp 7–40
