This paper examines the impact of Objective 1 funding in Europe in reducing country and regional disparities in gross value added per capita by presenting a critical review of both empirical studies and end-of-term programme reports. In practice, it is very difficult to establish impact effects because it is hard to establish the counterfactual. This difficulty arises as a consequence of different theoretical predictions as to what would happen in the absence of intervention, overlapping funding streams, and the regional impact of other policies such as European integration. There are also evaluation problems caused by data inadequacies and noise. Even so, the balance of evidence suggests that Objective 1 funding has had remarkably little demonstrable impact and there is, therefore, a strong case for reform.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllsoppC, 2003Review of Statistics for Economic Policymaking (The Stationery Office, London)
2.
ArmstrongH, 1995, “Convergence among regions of the European Union, 1950–1990”Papers in Regional Science74143–152
3.
BachtlerJTurokI, 1997The Coherence of EU Regional Policy: Contrasting Perspectives on the Structural Funds (Jessica Kingsley, London)
4.
BarroR J, 1991, “Economic growth in a cross-section of countries”The Quarterly Journal of Economics106407–443
5.
BarroR JSala-I-MartinX, 1991, “Convergence across states and regions”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1107–182
6.
BarroR JSala-I-MartinX, 1992, “Convergence”Journal of Political Economy100223–251
7.
BarroR JSala-I-MartinX, 1995Economic Growth (McGraw-Hill, New York)
8.
BehrensA, 2002Regional Household Accounts in the European Union and Candidate Countries (Eurostat, Brussels)
9.
BishopPGripaiosP, 2004, “Earnings biases and convergence in the UK: A county level analysis”Applied Economics Letters1133–37
10.
BishopPGripaiosP, 2006, “Earnings convergence in GB counties: A distribution dynamics approach”Applied Economics Letters1329–33
11.
BoldrinMCanovaF, 2001, “Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: Reconsidering European regional policies”Economic Policy32207–253
12.
BoscáJDoménechRTaguasD, 1999, “La política fiscal en la unión económica y monetaria”Moneda y Crédito206267–324
13.
BradleyJModestoLSosvilla-RiveroS, 1995, “Hermin: A macroeconometric modelling framework for the EU periphery”Economic Modelling12221–247
14.
BraunerhjelmPFainiRNormanVRuaneFSeabrightP, 2000Integration and the Regions of Europe: How the Right Policies can Prevent Polarization Monitoring European Integration 10, (CEPR, London)
15.
ButtonKPentecostE, 1995, “Testing for convergence of the EU regional economies”Economic Enquiry33664–671
16.
CappelenACastellacciFFagerbergJVerspagenB, 2003, “The impact of regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union”Journal of Common Market Studies41621–644
17.
Ceet-Ecotec, 2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1 Programmes 1994–99—Member State Report—Spain (DG Regio, Brussels)
18.
CheshirePMagriniS, 2000, “Endogenous processes in European regional growth: Convergence and policy”Growth and Change31455–479
19.
Cidec, 2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–99, National Report—Portugal (DG Regio, Brussels)
20.
CombesPOvermanH, 2003, “The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. Volume 4: Cities and Geography Eds HendersonVThisseJ (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2845–2910
21.
CorradoLMartinRWeeksM, 2005, “Identifying and interpreting regional convergence clusters across Europe”Economic Journal115133–160
22.
CuthbertsonKGripaiosP, 1997The Macroeconomy: A Business Perspective (International Thomson, London)
23.
Dall'ErbaSGalloJ, 2004, “Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis”, Economics Working Paper Archive WUSTL no. 0310005, Washington University, St Louis, MO
24.
de la FuenteAVivesX, 1995, “Infrastructure and education as instruments of regional policy: Evidence from Spain”Economic Policy2011–40
25.
DunfordM, 2005, “Old Europe, new Europe and the USA: Comparative economic performance, inequality and market led models of development”European Urban and Regional Studies12149–176
26.
EC, European Commission, Brussels
27.
1997Evaluating EU Expenditure Programmes: A Guide EC DGXIX
28.
1999aReform of the Structural Funds 2000–2006: Comparative Analysis
29.
1999b, “Indicators for monitoring and evaluation, the new programming period 2000–2006”, Methodological Working Papers, WP 3
30.
1999cEvaluating Socio-economic Programmes (The MEANS Collection)
31.
2004A New Partnership for Cohesion: Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion
32.
2006Structural Funds Regulations 2007–2013 Article 3, p L210/37
33.
2007Eurostat
34.
Ecorys2003Ex Post Evaluation Objective 1 Programme—Freisland 1994–1999 (DG Regio, Brussels)
35.
Ecotec, 2003aEx Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999, National Report—UK (DG Regio, Brussels)
36.
Ecotec, 2003bEvaluation of the Added Value and Costs of the European Structural Funds in the UKOffice of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
37.
Ecotec, 2003cEx Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999: National Report—France (DG Regio, Brussels)
38.
Ecotec/Idea2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1, 1994–1999—Belgium (DG Regio, Brussels)
39.
EderveenSGarterJde MooijRNahuisR, 2002Funds and Games: The Economics of European Cohesion PolicyCBP Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague
40.
ESRI, 2002, “An examination of the ex post macroeconomic impacts of CSF 1994 on Objective 1 countries and regions”, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin
41.
EstebanJRayD, 1994“On the measurement of polarization”Econometrica62819–851
42.
European Enterprise Organisation, 2002Ex Post Evaluation of CSF in Objective 1 Regions—Country Report—Greece (DG Regio, Brussels)
43.
EzcurraRGilCPascualP, 2005, “Regional bipolarisation: The case of the European Union”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29984–995
44.
FingletonB, 1997, “Specification and testing of Markov chain models: An application to convergence in the European Union”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics59385–403
45.
Fitzpatrick Associates, 2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1, 1994–1999, National Report—Ireland (DG Regio, Brussels)
46.
FriedmanM, 1992, “Communication: Do old fallacies ever die?”Journal of Economic Literature302129–2132
47.
Garcia-SolanesJMaria-DoloresR, 2002, “The impact of European Structural Funds on economic convergence in European countries and regions”, in Convergence Issues in the European Union Eds MeeusenWVillaverdeJ (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 334–358
48.
GardinerBMartinRTylerP, 2005, “Regional dimensions of Europe's growth problem: Some brief reflections on the Sapir Report”Regional Studies39979–986
49.
GreshamPJonesG, 2000An Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation for Economic Development (Institute of Economic Development, London)
50.
GripaiosP, 2002, “Regional spending: A comment on Mackay”Regional Studies36685–689
51.
GripaiosPBishopP, 2006, “Objective One funding in the UK, a critical assessment”Regional Studies40937–952
52.
GripaiosPMundayM, 2000, “Uneven development in UK financial services: The case of the South West and Wales”Service Industries Journal20(1) 153–180
53.
GripaiosPBishopPKeastS, 2000, “Differences in GDP per head in GB counties: Some suggested explanations”Applied Economics321161–1167
54.
HenleyA, 2003On Regional Growth Convergence in Great Britain (University of Wales Press, Aberystwyth)
55.
HirschmanA O, 1958The Strategy of Economic Development (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
56.
HofferHWörgötterA, 1997, “Regional per capita income convergence in Austria”Regional Studies311–12
57.
Ismeri Europa, 2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999, National Report—Italy (DG Regio, Brussels)
58.
KrugmanP R, 1991, “Increasing returns and economic geography”Journal of Political Economy99483–499
MartinR, 1998a, “Regional incentive spending for European regions”Regional Studies32527–536
61.
MartinR, 1998bRegional Policy in the European Union (CPER, Brussels)
62.
MartinR, 1999a, “Regional convergence in the EU: Determinants for catching-up or staying behind”Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft/Review of Regional Research19157–181
63.
MartinR, 1999bThe Regional Dimension in European Public Policy: Convergence or Divergence? (St Martin's Press, New York)
64.
MartinR, 2005, “Regional policy”, in European Economic Integration Eds McDonaldFDeardenS (Prentice-Hall, Harlow, Essex) pp 227–253
65.
MauroLPodreccaE, 1994, “The case of Italian regions: Convergence or dualism?”Economic Notes23447–472
66.
Midelfart-KnarvikKOvermanH, 2002, “Delocation and European integration: Is structural spending justified?”Economic Policy17321–359
67.
MyrdalG, 1957Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions (Duckworth, London)
68.
NevenDGouyetteC, 1995, “Regional convergence in the European Community”Journal of Common Market Studies3347–65
69.
PearceGMartinS, 1996, “The measurement of additionality: Grasping the slippery eel”Local Government Studies1349–61
70.
Puigcerver-PenalverM C, 2004, “The impact of the Structural Funds on European regions growth: A theoretical and empirical approach”, WP 141, Econometric Society, Latin American Meetings
71.
QuahD, 1993a, “Gallon's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis”Scandinavian Journal of Economics95427–443
72.
QuahD, 1993b, “Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth”European Economic Review37426–434
73.
QuahD, 1996, “Regional convergence clusters across Europe”European Economic Review40951–958
74.
QuahD, 1997, “Empirics for growth and distribution: Polarization, stratification and convergence clubs”Journal of Economic Growth227–59
75.
Rodríguez-PoseAFratesiU, 2004, “Between development and social policies: The impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 regions”Regional Studies3897–113
76.
RögerW, 1996, “Macroeconomic evaluation of the effects of Community Structural Funds (CSF) with QUEST II”, paper presented at the European Conference on Evaluation Methods for Structural Funds Intervention, Berlin
77.
SapirAAghionPBertolaGHellwigMPisani-FerryJRosatiDVinalsJWallaceH with ButiMNavaMSmithP, 2004An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
78.
SiriopoulosCAsteriouD, 1998, “Testing for convergence across the Greek region”Regional Studies32537–546
79.
StummT, 2002Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999, National Report—Austria (European Commission, Brussels)
80.
StummTRobertJ, 2003Ex Post Evaluation of Objective 1 1994–1999, National Report—Germany (European Commission, Brussels)
81.
TempleJ, 1999, “The new growth evidence”Journal of Economic Literature37112–156
82.
VenablesAGasiorekM, 1999Evaluating Regional Infrastructure: A Computable Equilibrium Approach in Study of the Socio-economic Impact of the Projects Financed by the Cohesion Fund—A Modelling Approach (European Commission, Luxembourg)
83.
VickermanRSpiekermanKWegnerM, 1999, “Accessibility and economic development in Europe”Regional Studies331–15
84.
WilliamsonJ G, 1965, “Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of the patterns”Economics and Cultural Change131–84
