Ever since the agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, climate change has become the most prominent global environmental issue on domestic political agendas. The author examines how a policy-network approach can contribute to the analysis of domestic climate change responses. Consideration is given to the role of advocacy coalitions and discourse coalitions within policy networks. It is argued that the discourse-coalition approach offers a useful explanation of the processes of coalition formation, interaction, and policy learning. Although it cannot alone explain the outcomes of the policy process, its emphasis on the dynamics of meaning, legitimacy, and knowledge as an essential part of policymaking can usefully be incorporated into an analysis of policy networks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABARE, 1997, “International climate change policy: Implications for Australia”, ABARE Current Issues, number 2, April, Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia, Canberra.
2.
BarnesI, 1992, “Value frameworks in the sustainable development debate”, in Ecopolitics V: Proceedings Ed. HardingR, (University of New South Wales Press, Sydney) pp 199–208.
3.
BCA, 1993, “Policy position on climate change”, report 4, Environment Policy Project, Business Council of Australia, Canberra.
4.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London).
5.
BorzelT A, 1998, “Organizing Babylon on the different conceptions of policy networks”Public Administration76252–273.
6.
BulkeleyH, 1997, “Global risk, local values: ‘risk society’ and the greenhouse issue in Newcastle, Australia”Local Environment2261–274.
7.
BulkeleyH, 1999Valuing the Global Environment: Public, Politics and Participationunpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
CollierULöfstedtR, (Eds), 1996Cases in Climate Change Policy: Political Reality in the European Union (Earthscan, London).
10.
DaugbjergC, 1998, “Linking policy networks and environmental policies; nitrate policy making in Denmark and Sweden”Public Administration76275–294.
11.
DEST, 1992National Greenhouse Response Strategy Department of Environment, Sport, and Territories (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra).
12.
DowdingK, 1995, “Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach”Political Studies43136–158.
13.
DoyleTKellowA, 1995Environmental Politics and Policy Making in Australia (Macmillan, Melbourne).
14.
DPIE, 1995The Greenhouse Challenge Greenhouse Challenge Office, Department of Primary Industry and Energy (Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra).
15.
DryzekJ, 1995, “Toward an ecological modernity”Policy Sciences28231–242.
16.
EckersleyR, 1993, “Re-interpreting no-regrets: A green economic critique of the Greenhouse Response Strategy”, in Greenhouse and the Energy Regions: Proceedings Eds PfullerSHooperMHarveyD H, (Monash Distance Education Centre, Melbourne) pp 55–68.
17.
EconomyESchreursM A, 1997, “Domestic and international linkages in environmental politics”, in The Internationalization of Environmental Protection Eds SchreursM AEconomyE, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–18.
GiddensA, 1990The Consequences of Modernity (Polity Press, Cambridge) Greenhouse Response Strategy”, in Greenhouse and the Energy Regions: Proceedings Eds PfullerSHooperMHarveyD H, (Monash Distance Education Centre, Melbourne) pp 55–68.
20.
HaasP, 1990Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Cooperation (Columbia University Press, New York).
21.
HaasPKeohaneR OLevyM A, (Eds), 1993Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
22.
HajerM, 1993, “Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain”, in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Eds FischerFForesterJ, (UCL Press, London) pp 43–76.
23.
HajerM, 1995aThe Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
24.
HajerM, 1995b, “Acid rain in Great Britain: Environmental discourse and the hidden politics of institutional practice”, in Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future Eds FisherFBlackM, (Paul Chapman, London) pp 145–164.
25.
HajerM, 1996, “Ecological modernization as cultural politics”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSSzerszynskiBWynneB, (Sage, London) pp 246–268.
26.
Jenkins-SmithHSabatierP, 1994, “Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework”Journal of Public Policy14175–203.
27.
JordanAGreenawayJ, 1998, “Shifting agendas, changing regulatory structures and the ‘new’ politics of environmental pollution: British Coastal water policy, 1955 – 1995”Public Administration76669–694.
28.
JordanAO'RiordanT, 1995a, “Institutional adaptation to global environmental change (I): Social institutions, policy change and social learning”, WP GEC 95 – 20, CSERGE, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
29.
JordanAO'RiordanT, 1995b, “Institutional adaptation to global environmental change (II): Core elements of an ‘institutional’ theory”, WP GEC 95-21, CSERGE, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
30.
JordanAO'RiordanT, 1997, “Social institutions and climate change: Applying cultural theory to practice”, WP GEC 97-15, CSERGE, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
31.
KinradeP, 1995, “Towards ecologically sustainable development: The role and shortcomings of markets”, in Markets, the State and the Environment: Towards an Integration Ed. EckersleyR, (Macmillan Education, Melbourne) pp 86–109.
32.
LitfinK, 1994Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation (Columbia University Press, New York).
33.
LoweI, 1994, “The greenhouse effect and the politics of long-term issues”, in The State, Economy and Public Policy in Australia Eds BellSHeadB, (Oxford University Press, Sydney) pp 315–333.
34.
MarchJOlsenJ, 1989Rediscovering Institutions (The Free Press, New York).
35.
MarchJOlsenJ, 1996, “Institutional perspectives on political institutions”Governance9247–264.
36.
MarshD, 1995, “State theory and the policy network model”, Strathclyde papers on Government and Politics 102, Department of Government, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
37.
MarshDRhodesR A W, (Eds), 1992aPolicy Networks in British Government (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
38.
MarshDRhodesR A W, 1992b, “Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology”, in Policy Networks in British Government Eds MarshDRhodesR A W, (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 249–268.
39.
NewellPPatersonM, 1998, “A climate for business: Global warming, the state and capital”Review of International Political Economy5679–703.
40.
O'RiordanTJägerJ, (Eds), 1996aPolitics of Climate Change: A European Perspective (Routledge, London).
41.
O'RiordanTJägerJ, 1996b, “Beyond climate change science and politics”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJägerJ, (Routledge, London) pp 346–360.
42.
O'RiordanTJordanA, 1995, “The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental politics”Environmental Values4191–212.
43.
O'RiordanTJordanA, 1996, “Social institutions and climate change”, in The Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJägerJ, (Routledge, London) pp 65–105.
44.
O'RiordanTCooperC LJordanARaynerSRichardsK RRucciPYoffeS, 1998, “Institutional frameworks for political action”, in Human Choice and Climate Change. Volume I. The Societal Framework Eds RaynerSMaloneE, (Battelle Press, Columbus, OH) pp 345–439.
45.
OwensSRaynerT, 1999, “When knowledge matters: The role and influence of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning17–24.
46.
PapadakisE, 1993Politics and the Environment: The Australian Experience (Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW).
47.
PatersonM, 1996Global Warming and Global Politics (Routledge, London).
48.
RhodesR A WMarshD, 1992, “Policy networks in British politics: A critique of existing approaches”, in Policy Networks in British Government Eds MarshDRhodesR A W, (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 1–26.
49.
RowlandsI H, 1995The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
50.
RowlandsI H, 1997, “International fairness and justice in addressing global climate change”Environmental Politics6(3) 1–30.
51.
SabatierP, 1998, “The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe”Journal of European Public Policy5(1) 98–130.
52.
SaurinJ, 1996, “International relations, social ecology and the globalisation of environmental change”, in The Environment and International Relations Eds VoglerJImberM F, (Routledge, London) pp 77–98.
53.
SchlagerE, 1995, “Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework”Policy Sciences28243–270.
SewellG C, 1996, “Conflicting beliefs: National implementation ofthe United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”Environmental Impact Assessment Review16137–150.
56.
SmithA, 1997Integrated Pollution Control: Change and Continuity in the Industrial Pollution Policy Network (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
57.
SmithM, 1993Pressure, Power and Policy (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)Sydney Morning Herald1997, “Finally, power no longer has to corupt”, 3 April.
58.
TaplinR, 1994, “Greenhouse: An overview of policy and practice”Australian Journal of Environmental Management1142–155.
59.
TaplinR, 1996, “Climate science and politics: The road to Rio and beyond”, in Climate Change: Developing Southern Hemisphere Perspectives Eds Henderson-SellersAGiambellucaT, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 377–395.
60.
ThompsonMRaynerS, 1998, “Cultural discourses” in Human Choice and Climate Change. Volume 1. The Societal Framework Eds RaynerSMaloneE, (Batelle Press, Columbus, OH) pp 265–343.
61.
United Nations, 1992, “Framework Convention on Climate Change”, in Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective Eds O'RiordanTJägerJ, (Routledge, London) pp 361–381; see also http://www.unfcccde/.
62.
United Nations, 1997Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climat ChangeUnited Nations Environment Program, http://www.unfcccde/.
63.
WilkenfeldGHamiltonCSaddlerH, 1995Australia's Greenhouse Strategy: Can the Future be Rescued? DP 3, The Australia Institute, Canberra.
