In this study we assess whether the two major political parties and their presidential candidates played any role in mobilizing public support for environmentalism, as compared with economic issues. Our empirical analysis is based on (1) content analysis of the party platforms, (2) content analysis of campaign rhetoric, and (3) identification of ‘attentive’ publics in the electorate. Over the period 1972–92 no fewer than 12% of respondents mentioned economics but no more than 3.9% mentioned purely environmental concerns. We conclude that the environmental policy agenda did not originate from two-party electoral competition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ E, 1997Public Policy Making3rd edition (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA)
2.
ANES, 1995, “American National Election Studies, 1948–1994”, CD-ROM Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI
3.
AsherH A, 1988Presidential Elections and American Elections4th edition (Dorsey, Chicago, IL)
4.
BerryJ M, 1997, “The party connection”, in The Interest Group Society3rd edition (Longman, New York) pp 44–63
5.
BradleyJ P, 1969, “Party platforms and party performance concerning social security”Polity1337–358
6.
BradyD, 1982, “Congressional party realignment and transformations of public policy in three realignment eras”American Political Science Review26333–360
7.
BuchananB, 1996Renewing Presidential Politics (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
8.
BudgeIHofferbertR I, 1990, “Mandates and policy outcomes: US party platforms and federal expenditures”American Political Science Review84111–131
9.
CaulfieldH P, 1989, “The conservation and environmental movements: An historical analysis”, in Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence Ed. LesterJ P, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 13–56
10.
CobbR WElderC D, 1972Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-building (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
11.
CobbR WRossJ-KRossM H, 1976, “Agenda building as a comparative political process”American Political Science Review70126–138
12.
CostainA N, 1992Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
13.
CostainW DLesterJ P, 1998, “The environmental movement and Congress”, in Social Movements and American Political Institutions Eds CostainA NMcFarlandA S, (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 185–198
14.
CrensonM A, 1971The Un-politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-decision Making in Two Cities (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
DavidP T, 1971, “Party platforms as national plans”Public Administration Review31303–315
17.
DaynesB WTatalovichR, 1992, “Presidential politics and abortion, 1972–1988”Presidential Studies Quarterly22545–561
18.
DunlapR E, 1987, “Public opinion on the environment in the Reagan era”Environment29 (July 6–11, (August) 32–37
19.
DunlapR E, 1989, “Public opinion and environmental policy”, in Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence Ed. LesterJ P, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 87–134
20.
FishelJ, 1985Presidents and Promises (Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC)
21.
FlanaganS, 1987, “Changing values in industrial societies revisited: Towards a resolution of the values debate”American Political Science Review811289–1319
22.
GinsbergB, 1976, “Elections and public policy”American Political Scienc Review7041–49
23.
HersheyM R, 1994, “The meaning of a mandate: Interpretations of ‘mandate’ in 1984 presidential election coverage”Polity27225–254
24.
HibbsD AJr, 1987The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics in the United States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
25.
HunterSNoonanV, 1993, “Energy, environment, and the presidential agenda”, in The Presidency Reconsidered Ed. WatermanR W, (Peacock Publishers, Itacsa, IL) pp 301–325
26.
InglehartR, 1990Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
27.
InglehartR, 1995, “Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies”PS: Poiltical Science and Politics28 (March) 57–71
28.
IngramH MMannD E, 1989, “Interest groups and environmental policy”, in Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence Ed. LesterJ P, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 135–157
29.
JensenE LGerberJBabcockG M, 1991, “The new war on drugs: Grass roots movement or political construction?”Journal of Drug Issues21651–667
30.
JoslynR, 1984Mass Media and Elections (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
31.
KernellS, 1978, “Explaining presidential popularity: How ad hoc theorizing, misplaced emphasis, and insufficient care in measuring one's variables refuted common sense and led conventional wisdom down the path of anomalies”American Political Science Review72506–522
32.
KiewietR D, 1983Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
33.
KingdonJ W, 1995Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies2nd edition (HarperCollins, New York)
34.
LangG ELangK, 1983The Battle for Public Opinion: The President, the Press, and the Polls during Watergate (Columbia University Press, New York)
35.
MalbinM J, 1981, “The conventions, platforms, and issue activists”, in The American Elections of 1980 Ed. RanneyA, (American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC) pp 99–141
36.
NevitteN, 1996The Decline of Deference (Broadview Press, Peterborough, Ontario)
37.
NieM A, 1997, “‘It's the environment, stupid!’: Clinton and the environment”Presidential Studies Quarterly2739–51
38.
PeretzP, 1983The Political Economy of Inflation in the United States (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
39.
PierceJ CStegerM A ESteelB SLovrichN P, 1992Citizens, Political Communication, and Interest Groups: Environmental Organizations in Canada and the United States (Praeger, Westport, CT)
40.
PomperG MLedermanS S, 1980Elections in America2nd edition (Longman, New York)
41.
RogersE MDearingJ W, 1988, “Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going?”Communication Yearbook II (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 555–594
42.
SchefferV B, 1991The Shaping of Environmentalism in America (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
43.
SharpE B, 1992, “Agenda-setting and policy results: Lessons from three drug policy episodes”Policy Studies Journal20538–551
44.
SharpE B, 1994, “Paradoxes of national anti-drug policy making”, in The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda Eds RochefortD ACobbR W, (University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS) pp 98–116
45.
SinclairB D, 1977, “Party realignment and the transformation of the political agenda”American Political Science Review71940–953
46.
SirgoH B, 1998, “Edmund S. Muskie and environmental policy formulation”, paper delivered to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA; copy available from the author, Department of Political Science, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA
47.
SpitzerR J, 1998, “Gun control: Constitutional mandate or myth?”, in Moral Controversies in American Politics Eds TatalovichRDaynesB W, (M E Sharpe, Armonk, NY) pp 164–195
48.
TatalovichRWattierM J, 1999, “Opinion-party leadership: Elections, campaigns, agenda-setting and environmentalism”, in The Environmental Presidency Ed. SodenD, (State University of New York, Albany, NY) forthcoming
49.
Time Almanac of the 20th Century1994 (Compact Publishing, Washington, DC)
50.
WalkerJ L, 1969, “The diffusion of innovations among the American states”American Political Science Review68880–899
51.
WattierM J, 1991, “Platform promises and campaign communications: Developing and discussing the 1988 Democratic platform”Southeastern Political Review19170–192
52.
WhiteT H, 1961The Making of the President 1960 (Atheneum, New York)
