Between 1850 and 1920 the roles of women were dramatically transformed. As participation in public activities became more socially, politically, and economically feasible, changes in domestic life limited the ability of many middle-class women to take advantage of these opportunities. The three processes of suburbanization, growth of social mobility, and an industrial economy increasingly based on domestic consumption, including innovations in household technology, all had the potential to unburden and enrich women's lives. Interrelationships among the three processes, however, worked to the detriment of some middle-class women with limited financial resources. A structurationist perspective is used to examine the interrelationships between social processes that affected women and the responses of individual women to these processes. The role of ideology, which made it acceptable for some middle-class women to do domestic work in 1920, whereas the opposite was true in 1850, is singled out for special attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BhaskarR, 1978The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (Harvester Press, Brighton)
2.
BoseC, 1979, “Technology and change in the division of labor in the American home”Women's Studies International Quarterly2(3) 295–304
3.
BourdieuP, 1977Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
4.
BourdieuPPasseronJ-C, 1977Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
5.
ConnellR W, 1979, “A critique of the Althusserian approach to class”Theory and Society8303–345
6.
CottN, 1977The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835 (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
7.
CowanR S, 1976a, “The ‘industrial revolution’ in the home: Household technology and social change in the twentieth century”Technology and Culture171–23
8.
CowanR S, 1976b, “Two washes in the morning and a bridge party at night: The American housewife between the wars”Women's Studies3147–171
9.
DeglerC N, 1980At Odds: Women and the Family in America from the Revolution to the Present (Oxford University Press, New York)
10.
DouglasA, 1977The Feminization of American Culture (Alfred Knopf, New York)
11.
DouglassH P, 1925The Suburban Trend (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York); reprinted 1970 (Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York)
12.
DublinT, 1979Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860 (Columbia University Press, New York)
13.
EhrenreichBEnglishD, 1975, “The manufacture of housework”Socialist Revolution5(4) 5–40
14.
EisensteinZ, 1979Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism (Monthly Review Press, London)
15.
EwenS, 1976Captains of Consciousness: Advertising and the Social Roots of the Consumer Culture (McGraw-Hill, New York)
16.
FlexnerE, 1959Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
FrederickC, 1912The New Housekeeping: Efficiency Studies in Home Management (Doubleday, Garden City, NY)
18.
FrederickC, 1914Household Engineering: Scientific Management in the Home (American School of Home Economics, Chicago, IL)
19.
GiddensA, 1979Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
20.
GiddensA, 1981A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
21.
GilmanC P, 1898Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution (Small, Maynard and Company, Boston, MA); reprinted 1966 (Harper and Row, New York)
22.
GoldinC, 1978, “Family strategies in late nineteenth-century Philadelphia” paper presented at a conference on regional economic history, held 13 October at the Regional Economic History Center, Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation, Greenville, Wilmington, Delaware; copy available as a mimeograph from the author
23.
HaydenD, 1977a, “Catharine Beecher and the politics of housework” in Women in American Architecture: A Historic and Contemporary Perspective Ed. TorreS, (Whitney Library of Design, New York) pp 40–49
24.
HaydenD, 1977b, “Challenging the American domestic ideal” in Women in American Architecture: A Historic and Contemporary Perspective Ed. TorreS, (Whitney Library of Design, New York) pp 32–39
25.
HaydenD, 1980, “Redesigning the domestic workplace” in New Space for Women Eds WekerleGPetersonRMorleyD, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 101–121
26.
HaydenD, 1981The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
27.
HobsbawmE J, 1968Industry and Empire: An Economic History of Britain Since 1750 (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London)
28.
HowellsW D, 1870Suburban Sketches (Hurd and Houghton, Boston, MA)
29.
KatzM B, 1976The People of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and Class in a Mid-Nineteenth-Century City (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
30.
KatzmanD M, 1978Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America (Oxford University Press, New York)
31.
KosikK, 1976Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World (D Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands); translated by KovandaKSchmidtJ, from Dialektika Konkretniho
32.
MillerR, 1979, “A time-geographic assessment of the impact of horsecar transportation on suburban non-heads-of-household in Philadelphia, 1850–1860” PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, CA
33.
MillerR, 1982, “Household activity patterns in the emerging nineteenth-century suburb”Annals of the Association of American Geographers72(3) 355–371
34.
ModellJHarevenT, 1973, “Urbanization and the malleable household: An examination of boarding and lodging in American families”Journal of Marriage and the Family35467–479
35.
O'NeillW, 1969Everyone Was Brave: The Rise and Fall of Feminism in America (Quadrangle, Chicago, IL)
36.
PalmRPredA, 1974, “A time-geographic perspective on problems of inequality for women” WP-236, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, CA
37.
PredA, 1981a, “Of paths and projects: Individual behavior and its societal context” in Behavioral Problems in Geography Revisited Eds GolledgeRCoxK, (Methuen, London) pp 231–255
38.
PredA, 1981b, “Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life”Geografiska Annaler63(B) 5–22
39.
PredA, 1983, “Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places”Annals of the Association of American Geographers (forthcoming)
40.
RockCTorreSWrightG, 1980, “The appropriation of the house: Changes in house design and concepts of domesticity” in New Space for Women Eds WekerleG RPetersonRMorleyD, (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 83–100
41.
SedgwickC M, 1837Live and Let Live: Or, Domestic Service Illustrated (Harper and Brothers, New York)
42.
SklarK K, 1973Catharine Beecher: A Study in American Domesticity (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
43.
Smith-RosenbergC, 1975, “The female world of love and ritual: Relations between women in nineteenth-century America”Signs11–29
44.
StrasserS, 1982Never Done: A History of American Housework (Pantheon Books, New York)
45.
TerrillB M, 1912Handbook of Housekeeping (American School of Home Economics, Chicago, IL)
46.
ThriftNPredA, 1981, “Time-geography: A new beginning”Progress in Human Geography5277–286
47.
WalkerR A, 1977The Suburban Solution: Urban Geography and Urban Reform in the Capitalist Development of the United States Ph D dissertation, Department of Geography, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
48.
WrightE O, 1980, “Varieties of Marxist conceptions of class structure”Politics and Society9(3) 323–370
49.
WrightG, 1980Moralism and the Model Home: Domestic Architecture and Cultural Conflict in Chicago, 1873–1913 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
50.
WrightG, 1981Building the Dream: A Social History of Housing in America (Pantheon Books, New York)
51.
ZaretskyE, 1976Capitalism, the Family and Personal Life (Harper and Row, New York)
