The question of whether class or territory is the stronger basis of social mobilisation is examined. It is suggested that the economic problems being experienced by many older industrial areas can give rise to regional coalitions that seek to transcend class antagonisms in order to press for state investment to improve regional growth and employment prospects. But it is further argued that, because of the heterogeneity of the sociospatial base in such regions, supralocal coalitions will be vulnerable to the effects of allocative decisions favouring particular within-region locations. The notion of the vulnerability of regional social bases to the expression of local class interests is explored in the context of industrial South Wales. This region has been subject to successive attempts at economic revival, often in response to an apparently coherent regional voice pressing for state regional interventions. Important parts of various policies for restructuring the regional economy have been defeated in the past, precisely because of the impotence of regional coalitions to carry disadvantaged local class groupings along with them. On occasions, such local class groupings have been capable of mobilising popular support, indicating more the defensive than offensive nature of their power.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcalyRMermelsteinD, 1977The Fiscal Crisis of American Cities (Vintage Books, New York)
2.
BleitrachDChenuA, 1979L'Usine et la Vie: Luttes Regionales (Maspero, Paris)
3.
BoddyM, 1983, “Central–local government relations: Theory and practice”Political Geography Quarterly2119–138
4.
CawsonASaundersP, 1981, “Corporatism, competitive politics and class struggle” paper given at a British Sociological Association/Political Studies Association joint conference entitled “Capital, ideology and politics”, University of Sheffield, England, January; copy available from A Cawson, School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Palmer, Brighton, England
5.
ClavelP, 1983Opposition Planning in Wales and Appalachia (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
6.
CockburnC, 1977The Local State (Pluto Press, London)
7.
CookeP, 1982a, “Class interests, regional restructuring and state formation in Wales”international Journal of Urban and Regional Research6187–204
8.
CookeP, 1982b, “Tertiarisation and socio-spatial differentiation in Wales”Geoforum12319–330
9.
CookeP, 1983Theories of Planning and Spatial Development (Hutchinson, London) forthcoming
10.
CookePMorganKJacksonD, 1984, “New technology and regional development in austerity Britain: The case of the semiconductor industry”Regional Studies18 (February issue); forthcoming
11.
CookePReesG, 1981, “The restructuring of industrial South Wales: The case of a state-managed region”Policy Studies Journal10284–296
12.
DaviesV, 1983, “Tertiarisation and feminisation at the periphery” paper presented at the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, Wales, April; copy available from V Davies, Department of Town Planning, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff, Wales
13.
DearMClarkG, 1981, “Dimensions of local state autonomy”Environment and Planning A131277–1294
14.
DuncanSGoodwinM, 1982, “The local slate and restructuring social relations: Theory and practice”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6157–186
15.
DunfordM, 1977, “The restructuring of industrial space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1510–520
16.
DunfordM, 1979, “Capital accumulation and regional development in France”Geoforum1081–108
17.
Esping-AndersenGFriedlandRWrightE, 1976, “Modes of class struggle and the capitalist state”Kapitalistatedouble issue 4/5, pp 186–220
18.
FreemanC, 1982Technical Change and Unemployment (Frances Pinter, London)
19.
FriedlandRPivenF FoxAlfordR, 1977, “Political conflict, urban structure and the fiscal crisis”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1447–473
20.
GoodmanR, 1979The Last Entrepreneurs: America's Regional Wars for Jobs and Dollars (Simon and Schuster, New York)
21.
GramsciA, 1971Selections from Prison Notebooks (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
22.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
23.
HirschJ, 1981, “The apparatus of the state, the reproduction of capital and urban conflicts” in Urbanisation and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society Eds DearMScottA J, (Methuen, Andover, Hants) pp 593–607
24.
HollowayJ, 1978, “State, restructuring, local state” Conference of Socialist Economists State Group research paper; copy available from HollowayJ, Department of Politics, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
25.
JessopB, 1977, “Recent theories of the capitalist state”Cambridge Journal of Economics1353–373
26.
JessopB, 1980, “The political indeterminacy of democracy” in Marxism and Democracy Ed. HuntA, (Lawrence and Wishart, London) pp 55–80
27.
JessopB, 1982The Capitalist State (Martin Robertson, Oxford)
28.
LaclauE, 1977Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (Verso, London)
29.
LipietzA, 1977Le Capital et Son Espace (Maspero, Paris)
30.
LipietzA, 1980, “Inter-regional polarisation and the tertiarisation of society”Papers of the Regional Science Association443–18
31.
MacintyreS, 1980Little Moscows: Communism and Working Class Militancy in Inter-war Britain (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
32.
MarkusenA, 1976, “Class and urban social expenditures: A local theory of the state”Kapitalistatedouble issue 4/5, pp 50–65
33.
MarkusenA, 1978, “Class and urban social expenditure: A Marxist theory of metropolitan government” in Marxism and the Metropolis Eds TabbWSawersL, (Oxford University Press, London) pp 90–111
34.
MasseyD, 1978, “Regionalism: Some current issues”Capital and Class6106–125
35.
MasseyD, 1979, “In what sense a regional problem?”Regional Studies13233–243
36.
MasseyD, 1980, “Industrial restructuring as class restructuring: Some examples of the implications of industrial change for class structure” working note 604, Centre for Environmental Studies, 62 Chandos Place, London WC2N 4H
37.
MasseyDMeeganR, 1979, “The geography of industrial reorganisation”Progress in Planning10155–237
38.
MingioneE, 1977, “Theoretical elements for a Marxist analysis of urban development” in Captive Cities Ed. HarloeM, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 89–110
39.
MingioneE, 1978, “Capitalist crisis, neo-dualism and marginalisation”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2213–221
40.
MingioneE, 1981a, “Perspectives on the spatial division of labour under the recent productive restructuring and informalisation of the economy” paper given at a conference entitled “New Perspectives on the Urban Political Economy”, American University, Washington, DC, May; copy available from E Mingione, Faculty of Political Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
41.
MingioneE, 1981bSocial Conflict and the City (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
42.
MorganK, 1979, “State regional interventions and industrial reconstruction in postwar Britain: The case of Wales” Sussex Working Papers in Urban and Regional Studies 16; copy available from the School of Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, England
43.
MurrayF, 1983, “The decentralisation of production—the decline of the mass-collective worker?”Capital and Class1974–99
44.
O'ConnorJ, 1981, “The meaning of crisis”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research5301–329
45.
OffeC, 1975, “The theory of the capitalist state and the problem of policy-formation” in Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism Eds LindbergLAlfordRCrouchCOffeC, (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 125–144
46.
OverbeekH, 1980, “Finance capital and the crisis in Britain”Capital and Class1199–120
47.
PavittK, (Ed.), 1980Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance (Macmillan, London)
48.
PickvanceC, 1983, “Spatial policy as territorial politics: The role of spatial conditions in the articulation of ‘spatial’ interests and in the demand for spatial policy” paper presented at the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, Wales, April; copy available from PickvanceC, Urban and Regional Studies Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, England
49.
PrzeworskiA, 1977, “Proletariat into a class: The process of class formation from Karl Kautsky's The Class Struggle to recent controversies”Politics and Society7343–401
50.
PrzeworskiA, 1980, “Material bases of consent: Economics and politics in a hegemonic system”Political Power and Social Theory121–66
51.
ReesGLambertJ, 1981, “Nationalism as legitimation? Notes towards a political economy of urban development in South Wales” in Perspectives on Urban Change and Conflict Ed. HarloeM, (Heinemann Educational Books, London) pp 122–137
52.
SaeyP, 1978, “Marx and the students of space”L'Espace Geographique115–25
53.
SaundersP, 1980Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
54.
SaundersP, 1981Social Theory and the Urban Question (Hutchinson, London)
55.
UrryJ, 1981aThe Anatomy of Capitalist Societies (Macmillan, London)
56.
UrryJ, 1981b, “Localities, regions and social class”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research5455–474
57.
UrryJ, 1983a, “Some notes on realism and the analysis of space”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research7122–126
58.
UrryJ, 1983b, “Theoretical realism, space and time” paper presented to the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, Wales, April; copy available from J Urry, Department of Sociology, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England
59.
Welsh Office, 1967Wales: The Way Ahead Cmnd 3334 (HMSO, London)
60.
WilliamsG, 1982The Welsh in their History (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
