Gender has long been recognised as important within environmental issues, but there has been considerable debate over how to conceptualise the gender–environment nexus. As feminist theorising around women and gender has changed, so have conceptualisations about gender and environment, leading to a key debate within ecofeminism and related literatures about whether there is an essential or a contingent relationship between women and natural environments. Within geography, most political ecologists work with the assumption that the gender–environment nexus is a contingent relationship, and thus investigate how gender relations are salient in the symbolic and material construction of environmental issues. In this paper I seek to build from this work and again raise the issue of how gender is conceptualised in relation to environment. I begin by briefly reviewing some of the work that has been done on gender and environment and then draw from poststructural feminism to suggest that gender itself has been undertheorised in work on environment. Once gender is reconceptualised as a process, the dynamic relationship between gender, environment, and other aspects of social and cultural life can be brought into view. What emerges is the need for political ecologists to examine gender beyond the household and community and the need to reconceptualise the gender–environment nexus. A case study of community forestry in Nepal is used to illustrate the importance of interrogating the processes by which gender relations become salient and are reproduced symbolically and materially.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsW M, 1990Green Development (Routledge, New York).
2.
AgarwalB, 1992, “The gender and environment debate: Lessons from India”Feminist Studies18119–158.
3.
AgarwalB, 1994A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
4.
AgarwalB, 1997, “Environmental action: Gender equity and women's participation”Development and Change281–43.
5.
ArnoldJEM, 1998Managing Forests as Common Property (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome).
6.
BarkerD K, 2000, “Dualisms, discourse, and development”, in Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World Eds NarayanUHardingS (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 177–188.
7.
BatterburySForsythTThomsonK, 1997, “Environmental transformations in developing countries: Hybrid research and democratic policy”The Geographical Journal163126–132.
8.
BebbingtonABatterburyS, 2001, “Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: Political ecologies of globalization”Ecumene: A Journal of Cultural Geographies8369–380.
9.
BennettL, 1983Dangerous Wives and Sacred Sisters: Social and Symbolic Roles of High Caste Women in Nepal (Columbia University Press, New York).
10.
BhattaraiKConwayDShresthaN, 2002, “The vacillating evolution of forestry policy in Nepal”International Development Planning Review24315–338.
11.
BlaikiePBrookfieldH, 1987Land Degradation and Society (Methuen, London).
12.
BlaikiePCameronJSeddonJ D, 1980Nepal in Crisis: Growth and Stagnation in the Periphery (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
13.
BondiL, 1993, “Locating identity politics”, in Place and the Politics of Identity Eds KeithMPileS, (Routledge, New York) pp 84–101.
14.
BondiLDavidsonJ, 2004, “Troubling the place of gender”, in Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN (Sage, London) pp 325–343.
15.
BourqueS CWarrenK B, 1981Women of the Andes: Patriarchy and Social Change in Two Peruvian Towns (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).
16.
BraunBCastreeN, 1998Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium (Routledge, New York).
17.
BryantR L, 1998, “Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: A review”Progress in Physical Geography2279–94.
18.
ButlerJ, 1990Gender Play: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, New York).
19.
ButlerJ, 1992, “Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’”, in Feminists Theorize the Political Eds ButlerJScottJ (Routledge, London) pp 3–21.
20.
ButlerJ, 1997The Psychic Life of Power (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
21.
CarneyJ, 1994, “Contracting a food staple in the Gambia”, in Living Under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa Eds LittlePWattsM (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 167–187.
22.
CarneyJ, 1996, “Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM (Routledge, New York) pp 165–186.
23.
ChantSRadcliffeS A, 1992, “Migration and development: The importance of gender”, in Gender and Migration in Developing Countries Ed. ChantS (Belhaven Press, London) pp 1–29.
24.
ConnellR W, 1987Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics (Polity Press in association with Blackwell, Oxford).
25.
CuomoC J, 1998Ecological Feminism: An Ethic of Flourishing (Routledge, London).
26.
DeereC D, 1990Household and Class Relations: Peasants and Landlords in Northern Peru (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
27.
DeereC Dde LealM L, 1981, “Peasant production, proletarianization, and the sexual division of labor in the Andes”Signs7338–360.
28.
DemerittD, 1998, “Science, social constructivism and nature”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 173–193.
29.
DemerittD, 2001, “Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature's limits in the Progressive-era United States”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19431–459.
30.
DiamondIOrensteinG F, 1990Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism (Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA).
31.
EckholmE P, 1975, “The deterioration of mountain environments”Science189764–770.
32.
EscobarA, 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
33.
FortmannL, 1996, “Gendered knowledge: Rights and space in two Zimbabwe villages: Reflections on methods and findings”, in Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences Eds RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE, (Routledge, New York) pp 211–223.
34.
FreidbergS, 2001a, “To garden, to market: Gendered meanings of work on an African urban periphery”Gender, Place and Culture85–24.
35.
FreidbergS E, 2001b, “Gardening on the edge: The social conditions of unsustainability on an African periphery”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91349–369.
36.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K, 1996The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It) (Blackwell, Maiden, MA).
37.
GilmourD AFisherR J, 1991Villagers, Forests and Foresters: The Philosophy, Processes and Practice of Community Forestry in Nepal (Sahayogi Press, Kathmandu).
38.
GisbertM EQuitónMPainterM, 1994, “Gender issues associated with labor migration and dependence on off-farm income in rural Bolivia”Human Organization53110–122.
39.
GranerE, 1997The Political Ecology of Community Forestry in Nepal, Volume 14 Ed. BohleH-G (Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik, Saarbrücken).
40.
GriffinS, 1978Woman and Nature: The Roaring Insider Her (Harper and Row, New York).
41.
GururaniS, 2000, “Regimes of control, strategies of access: Politics of forest use in the Uttarakhand Himalaya, India”, in Agrarian Environments: Resources, Representation and Rule in India Eds AgrawalASivaramakrishnanK (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 170–190.
42.
GururaniS, 2002, “Forests of pleasure and pain: Gendered practices of labor and livelihood in the forests of Kumaon Himalayas, India”Gender, Place and Culture9229–243.
43.
HansonSPrattG, 1995Gender, Work and Space (Routledge, London).
44.
HarawayD, 1991Simians, Cyborgs and Women (Routledge, New York).
45.
HarrisL M, 2006, “Irrigation, gender, and the social geographies of the changing waterscapes of Southeastern Anatolia”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24187–213.
46.
HobleyM, 1996Participatory Forestry: The Process of Change in India and Nepal (Overseas Development Institute, London).
47.
HooksB, 1984Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center (South End Press, Boston, MA).
48.
HooksB, 1990Yearning: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics (South End Press, Boston, MA).
49.
KanelKVarugheseG, 2000, “Economic benefits of decentralizing forest management: A comparative study of four community forestry user groups in Nepal”, paper presented at Constituting the Commons: Crafting Sustainable Commons in the New Millennium: Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), Bloomington, IN, 31 May–4 June, http://dc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/0000028.
50.
KharelS, 1993, “Women's participation in community forestry: The Nepal–Australia Community Forestry Project's experience”Banko Janakari473–75.
51.
KobayashiA, 1994, “Coloring the field: Gender,‘race’, and the politics of fieldwork”The Professional Geographer4673–80.
52.
KobayashiAPeakeL, 1994, “Unnatural discourse, ‘race’ and gender in geography”Gender, Place and Culture1225–243.
53.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
54.
McDowellL, 1999Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
55.
McKeanM A, 1992, “Success on the commons: A comparative examination of institutions for common property resource management”Journal of Theoretical Politics43247–281.
56.
MackenzieF, 1995, “Selective silence: A feminist encounter with environmental discourse in colonial Africa”, in Power of Development Ed. CrushJ (Routledge, New York) pp 100–112.
57.
MahoneyM AYngvessonB, 1992, “The construction of subjectivity and the paradox of resistance: Reintegrating feminist anthropology and psychology”Signs1844–73.
58.
MasseyD, 1994Space, Place and Gender (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
59.
MehtaABondiL, 1999, “Embodied discourse: On gender and fear of violence”Gender, Place and Culture667–84.
60.
MerchantC, 1982The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (Wildwood House, Aldershot, Hants).
61.
MesserschmidtD A, 1987, “Conservation and society in Nepal: Traditional forest management and innovative development”, in Lands at Risk in the Third World: Local-level Perspectives Eds LittleP DHorowitzM MNyergesA E (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 373–397.
62.
MiesMShivaV, 1993Ecofeminism (Kali for Women, London).
63.
MoeckliJBraunB, 2001, “Gendered natures: Feminism, politics, and social nature”, in Social Nature: Theory, Practice and Politics Eds CastreeNBraunB (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 112–132.
64.
MoragaCAnzalduaG, 1988This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (Women of Color Press, New York).
65.
MoserCON, 1993Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training (Routledge, London).
NelsonL, 1999, “Bodies (and spaces) do matter: The limits of performativity”Gender, Place and Culture6331–353.
68.
NesmithCRadcliffeS, 1993, “(Re)mapping Mother Earth: A geographical perspective on environmental feminisms”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11379–394.
69.
NightingaleA J, 2001A ‘Trialectic of Community Forestry Management in Mugu District, Western Nepal: Power, Cultural Meanings and Ecology unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
70.
NightingaleA J, 2002, “Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry”Journal of Forestry and Livelihoods217–24.
71.
NightingaleA J, 2003, “Nature–society and development: Cultural, social and ecological change in Nepal”Geoforum34525–540.
72.
NightingaleA J, 2005, “‘The experts taught us all we know’: Professionalisation and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry”Antipode37581–604.
73.
OrtnerS, 1974, “Is female to male as nature is to culture?”, in Women, Culture, and Society Ed. LamphereL (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) pp 67–87.
74.
OstromE, 1992, “The rudiments of a theory of the origins, survival, and performance of common-property institutions”, in Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy Eds BromleyD, (ICS Press, San Francisco, CA) pp 293–318.
75.
PeetRWattsM, 1996aLiberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements (Routledge, New York).
76.
PeetRWattsM, 1996b, “Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in an age of market triumphalism”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM, (Routledge, New York) pp 1–45.
77.
PiggS L, 1996, “The credible and the credulous: The question of ‘villagers’ beliefs' in Nepal”Cultural Anthropology11160–201.
78.
PittD C, 1986, “Crisis, pseudocrisis, or supercrisis. Poverty, women, and young people in the Himalaya: A survey of recent developments”Mountain Research and Development6119–131.
79.
PlumwoodV, 1991, “Nature, self, and gender: Feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism”Hypatia63–27.
80.
PrattGHansonS, 1994, “Geography and the construction of difference”Gender, Place and Culture15–29.
81.
RadcliffeS A, 1992, “Mountains, maidens and migration: Gender and mobility in Peru”, in Gender and Migration in Developing Countries Ed. ChantS (Belhaven Press, London) pp 30–48.
82.
ReedM G, 2000, “Taking stands: A feminist perspective on ‘other’ women's activism in forestry communities of northern Vancouver Island”Gender, Place and Culture7363–387.
83.
RegmiM C, 1988An Economic History of Nepal 1846–1901 (Nath Printing House, Varanasi).
84.
RocheleauDEdmundsD, 1997, “Women, men and trees: Gender, power and property in forest and agrarian landscapes”World Development251315–1371.
85.
RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE, 1996a, “Gender and environment: A feminist political ecology perspective”, in Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences Eds RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE, (Routledge, New York) pp 3–26.
86.
RocheleauDRossLMorrobelJ, 1996b, “From forest gardens to tree farms: Women, men and timber in Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic”, in Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences Eds RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (Routledge, New York) pp 224–250.
87.
SchroederR A, 1997, “‘Re-claiming’ land in the Gambia: Gendered property rights and environmental intervention”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87487–508.
88.
SchroederR ANeumannR P, 1995, “Manifest ecological destinies: Local rights and global environmental agendas”Antipode27321–324.
89.
SchroederR ASuryanataK, 1996, “Gender, class power in agroforestry systems: Case studies from Indonesia and West Africa”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM, (Routledge, New York) pp 188–204.
90.
ScottJ C, 1985Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
91.
ScottJ, 1991, “The evidence of experience”Critical Inquiry17773–797.
92.
SeagerJ, 1993Earth Follies: Coming to Feminist Terms with the Global Environmental Crisis (Routledge, New York).
93.
ShivaV, 1988Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development (Zed Books, London).
94.
ShresthaM LJoshiS PBhujuU RJoshiD BGautamM, 1995Community Forestry Manual (Her Majesty's Government Ministry of Forests and Soils Conservation, Kathmandu).
95.
SneddonC S, 2000, “‘Sustainability’ in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: A review”Progress in Human Geography24521–549.
96.
SundbergJ, 1998, “NGO landscapes in the Maya biosphere reserve, Guatemala”Geographical Review88388–412.
97.
SwyngedouwE, 1999, “Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89443–465.
98.
WangariEThomas-SlayterBRocheleauD, 1996, “Gendered visions for survival: Semi-arid regions in Kenya”, in Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences Eds RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE (Routledge, New York) pp 127–154.
99.
WarrenK J, 1987, “Feminism and ecology: Making connections”Environmental Ethics93–20.
100.
WarrenK JCheneyJ, 1991, “Ecological feminism and ecosystem ecology”Hypatia6179–197.
101.
WestP CBrechinS R, 1991Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ).
102.
ZimmererK S, 2000, “The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature–society hybrids”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90356–369.
