During the 1970s, the emphasis in Gunnar Olsson's work entailed a shift from linguistic investigations with a philosophical flavour to linguistic experiments seen as the core of a new social science. Both of these phases in Olsson's thinking have been received, however, with scepticism by human geographers. An attempt is made here to allay some of this scepticism by demonstrating the relevance of Olsson's concerns, first to the critique of a positivist and functionalist human geography, and second to the emergent ‘agency-structure’ debate as this touches upon the concerns of human geographers. In the latter respect it is suggested that Olsson's focus on the internal dimensions of the meshing of individual and society can perhaps complement the structurationist focus on the more external dimensions of the meshing of agency and structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerAGregoryD, 1984, “Some terrae incognitae in historical geography” in Explorations in Historical Geography Eds BakerAGregoryD, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) in preparation
2.
BhaskarR, 1979The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex)
3.
BillingeM, 1983, “The Mandarin dialect: An essay on style in contemporary geographical writing”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers8400–420
4.
ButtimerA, 1974, “Values in geography” RP-24, Association of American Geographers, Commission on College Geography, 1710 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20009, USA
5.
ButtimerA, 1976, “Grasping the dynamism of the lifeworld”Annals of the Association of American Geographers66277–292
6.
DallmayrF, 1982, “The theory of structuration: A critique” in Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory Ed. GiddensA, (Macmillan, London) pp 18–27
7.
DuncanJ, 1980, “The superorganic in American cultural geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers70181–198
GiddensA, 1979Central Problems in Social Theory (Macmillan, London)
10.
GouldP, 1982, “Prologue: A search for common ground” in A Search for Common Ground Eds GouldPOlssonG, (Pion, London) pp 1–7
11.
GregoryD, 1978Ideology, Science and Human Geography (Hutchinson, London)
12.
GregoryD, 1981, “Human agency and human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers61–18
13.
GregoryD, 1982a, “A realist construction of the social: Reply to Ley”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers7254–256
14.
GregoryD, 1982bRegional Transformation and Industrial Revolution: A Geography of the Yorkshire Woollen Industry, 1780–1840 (Macmillan, London)
15.
GregoryD, 1982c, “Solid geometry: Notes on the recovery of spatial structure” in A Search for Common Ground Eds GouldPOlssonG, (Pion, London) pp 187–219
16.
GregoryD, 1984aSocial Theory and Spatial Structure (Hutchinson, London) in preparation
17.
GregoryD, 1984b, “Suspended animation: The stasis of diffusion theory” in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ, (Macmillan, London) in preparation
18.
GuelkeL, 1982Historical Understanding in Geography: An Idealist Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
19.
HabermasJ, 1978Knowledge and Human Interests translated by ShapiroJ J, (Heinemann Educational Books, London)
20.
HarveyD, 1969Explanation in Geography (Edward Arnold, London)
