Despite the benefits of ex post facto reasoning, what remains in dispute is the interpretation of the factors responsible for the emergence of the newly industrialising countries (NICs) of East and Southeast Asia. Here it is argued that the dominant perspective, that deriving from neoclassical economics, is both defective and misrepresentative. In an attempt to overcome these inadequacies recourse is made to radical political economy perspectives to understand better the significance of industrialisation in the NICs.
AminS, 1976Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formation of Peripheral Capitalism (Monthly Review Press, New York)
3.
AminS, 1980Class and Nation: Historically and in the Current Crisis (Heinemann Educational Books, London)
4.
AmsdenA H, 1979, “Taiwan's economic history: A case of etatisme and a challenge to dependency theory”Modern China5341–380
5.
BalassaB, 1971, “Industrial policies in Taiwan and Korea”Welwirtschaftliches Archiv10655–77
6.
BalassaB, 1978, “Export incentives and export performance in developing countries: A comparative analysis”Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv11424–61
7.
BalassaB, 1982a“Development strategies and economic performance: A comparative analysis of eleven semi-industrial economies” inDevelopment Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies Ed. BalassaB, (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 38–62
8.
BalassaB, 1982b, “Reforming the system of incentives in developing economics” inDevelopment Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies Ed. BalassaB, (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 63–79
9.
BalassaB, 1984, “Adjustment policies in developing countries: A reassessment”World Development12955–972
10.
BaroneC A, 1983, “Dependency, Marxist theory, and salvaging the idea of capitalism in South Korea”Review of Radical Political Economics15(1) 41–67
11.
BarrettR EWhyteM K, 1982, “Dependency theory and Taiwan: Analysis of a deviant case”American Journal of Sociology871064–1089
12.
BhagwatiJ NKruegerA O, 1973, “Exchange control, liberalization and economic development”American Economic Review63419–427
13.
BienefeldM, 1981, “Dependency and the newly industrializing countries (NICs): Towards a reappraisal” inDependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment Ed. SeersD, (Francis Pinter, London) chapter 2
14.
BienefeldM, 1982, “The international context for national development strategies: Constraints and opportunities in a changing world” inThe Struggle for Development: National Strategies in an International Context Eds BienefeldMGodfreyM, (John Wiley, New York) chapter 1
15.
BienefeldMGodfreyM, 1982, “Introduction” inThe Struggle for Development: National Strategies in an International Context Eds BienefeldMGodfreyM, (John Wiley, New York) pp 1–24
16.
BradfordC I, 1982, “Newly industrializing countries in an interdependent world”The World Economy5171–185
17.
BrowettJ G, 1982, “Out of the dependency perspectives”Journal of Contemporary Asia12145–157
18.
BrowettJ G, 1985, “The newly industrialising countries and radical theories of development”World Development13789–803
19.
BurkittB, 1984Radical Political Economy (Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton, Sussex)
20.
ChilcoteR H, 1984Theories of Development and Underdevelopment (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
ClappRMasseyD, 1983, “The changing international division of labor: A case study of the first National Bank of Boston”Antipode15(2) 23–30
23.
ClineW R, 1982, “Can the East Asian model of development be generalized?”World Development1081–90
24.
CypherJ M, 1979, “The internationalisation of capital and the transformation of social formations. A critique of the Monthly Review School”Review of Radical Political Economics11(4) 33–49
25.
Datta-ChaudhriM K, 1981, “Industrialisation and foreign trade: The development experiences of South Korea and the Philippines” inExport-led Industrialisation and Development Ed. LeeE, Asian Employment Programme (ILO, Geneva) chapter 3
26.
EnosJ, 1984, “Government intervention in the transfer of technology: The case of South Korea”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 26–31
27.
FajnzylberF, 1981, “Some reflections on South-East Asian export industrialization”Cepal Review15111–132
28.
FrankA G, 1981Crisis: In The Third World (Heinemann Educational Books, London)
29.
FrobelFHenrichsJKreyeO, 1979The New International Division of Labour (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
30.
GibsonKGrahamJShakowPRassR, 1984, “A theoretical approach to capital and labour restructuring” inRegional Restructuring Under Advanced Capitalism Ed. O'KeefeP, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 39–64
31.
de V GraffJ, 1957Theoretical Welfare Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
32.
Griffith-JonesSRodriquezE, 1984, “Private international finance and industrialisation of LDCs”Journal of Development Studies2147–74
33.
HamiltonC, 1983, “Capitalist industrialization in the four little tigers of East Asia” inNeo-Marxist Theories of Development Eds LimquecoPMcFarlaneB, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) chapter 10
34.
HamiltonC, 1984, “Class, state and industrialisation in South Korea”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 38–43
35.
HarrisN, 1979, “The Asian boom economies and the ‘impossibility’ of national economic development”International Socialism2(3) 1–16
36.
HavrylyshynOAlikhaniI, 1982, “Is there a case for export optimism? An inquiry into the existence of a second generation of successful exporters”Weltwirtschafliches Archiv118651–663
37.
HsiaR, 1981, “Technological change, trade promotion and export-led industrialisation in Hong Kong and South Korea”Export-led Industrialisation and Development Ed. LeeE, Asian Employment Programme (ILO, Geneva) chapter 5
38.
HughesH, 1980, “Achievements and objectives of industrialization”Policies for Industrial Progress in Developing Countries Eds CodyJHughesHWallD, (Oxford University Press, New York) chapter 1
39.
HughesHWaelbroeckJ, 1981, “Can developing-country exports keep growing in the 1980s?”The World Economy4127–147
40.
KaplinskyR, 1984, “The international context for industrialisation in the coming decade”Journal of Development Studies2175–96
41.
KruegerA O, 1979The Development Role of the Foreign Sector and Aid: Studies in the Modernization of the Republic of Korea: 1945–1975 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
42.
LandsbergM, 1979, “Export-led industrialization in the Third World: Manufacturing imperialism”Review of Radical Political Economics11(4) 50–63
43.
LappleD, 1982, “Internationalization of capital and the regional problems”paper given to the 10th World Congress of Sociology, Mexico City, mimeo obtainable from Institute of Sociology, State University of Leiden, The Netherlands
44.
LeeE, 1981, “Export-led industrialisation in Asia: An overview” inExport-led Industrialisation and Development Ed. LeeE, Asian Employment Programme (ILO, Geneva) chapter 1
45.
LeeT HLiangK S, 1982, “Taiwan”Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies Ed. BalassaB, (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 310–350
46.
LittleI M D, 1981, “The experience and causes of rapid labour-intensive development in Korea, Taiwan Province, Hong Kong and Singapore and the possibilities of emulation” inExport-led Industrialisation and Development Ed. LeeE, Asian Employment Programme (ILO, Geneva) chapter 2
47.
LittleI M D, 1982Economic Develoment: Theory, Policy, and International Relations (Basic Books, New York)
48.
Luedde-NeurathR, 1980, “Export orientation in South Korea: How helpful is dependency thinking to its analysis?”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin12(1) 48–53
49.
Luedde-NeurathR, 1984, “State intervention and foreign direct investment in South Korea”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 18–25
50.
MarkusenA R, 1979, “Regionalism and the capitalist state: The case of the United States”Kapitalistate739–62
51.
MichellA, 1982, “South Korea: Vision of the future for labour surplus economies?” inThe Struggle for Development: National Strategies in an International Context Eds BienefeldMGodfreyM, (John Wiley, New York) chapter 7
52.
MichellT, 1984, “Administrative traditions and economic decision-making in South Korea”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 32–37
53.
MooreM, 1984, “Agriculture in Taiwan and South Korea: The minimalist state?”Institute for Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 57–64
54.
MunckR, 1979, “State intervention in Brazil: Issues and debates”Latin American Perspectives6(4) 16–31
55.
National Planning Association, 1981, “The emergence of newly industrializing countries”Development Digest19(2) 1–26
56.
NayyarD, 1978, “Transnational corporations and manufactured exports from poor countries”The Economic Journal8859–84
57.
PalloixC, 1973Les Firmes Multinationales et le Proces d'Internationalisation (Maspéro, Paris); pages 137–163 extracted and translated as “The internationalization of capital and the circuit of social capital” inInternational Firms and Modern Imperialism 1975 Ed. RadiceH, (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx) chapter 3
58.
PalloixC, 1977, “The self-expansion of capital on a world scale”Review of Radical Political Economics9(2) 1–28
59.
ParkY C, 1981, “Export-led development: The Korean experience 1960–78” inExport-led Industrialisation and Development Ed. LeeE, Asian Employment Programme (ILO, Geneva) chaper 4
60.
PeetR, 1983, “Introduction: The global geography of contemporary capitalism”Economic Geography59105–111
61.
PeetR, 1984, “Class struggle, the relocation of employment and economic crises”Science and Society4838–51
62.
RanisG, 1978, “Equity with growth in Taiwan: How ‘special’ is the ‘special case’?”World Development6397–409
63.
RaoD C, 1978, “Economic growth and equity in the Republic of Korea”World Development6383–396
64.
RosenbergW, 1980, “South Korea: Export-led development—sewered and unsewered”Journal of Contemporary Asia10300–308
65.
SchmitzH, 1984, “Industrialisation strategies in less developed countries: Some lessons of historical experience”Journal of Development Studies211–21
66.
ShakowD MGrahamJ, 1983, “The impact of the changing international division of labor on the labor force in mature industrial regions”Antipode15(2) 18–22
67.
ShinoharaM, 1983, “More NICs in time”Fareastern Economic Review 28 April, pp 66–67
68.
SlaterD, 1982, “State and regional question in Latin America” mimeo, Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation, Amsterdam
69.
SmithS, 1980, “The ideas of Samir Amin: Theory or tautology?”Journal of Development Studies175–21
70.
SraffaP, 1960Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
71.
StreetenP, 1982, “A cool look at ‘outward-looking’ strategies for development”The World Economy5159–169
72.
SutcliffeB, 1984, “Industry and underdevelopment re-examined”Journal of Development Studies21121–133
73.
SzymanskiA, 1984, “Productivity growth and capitalist stagnation”Science and Society48295–322
74.
UrryJ, 1981, “Localities, regions and social class”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research5455–474
75.
WadeR, 1983, “South Korea's agricultural development: The myth of the passive state”Pacific Viewpoint24(1) 11–28
76.
WadeR, 1984, “Dirigisme Taiwan-style”Institute of Development Studies Bulletin15(2) 65–70
77.
WarrenW, 1973, “Imperialism and capitalist industrialization”New Left Review813–44
78.
WarrenW, 1979, “The post-war economic experience of the Third World” inToward a New Strategy for Development Rothko Chapel Colloquium (Pergamon Press, New York) pp 144–168
79.
WarrenW, 1980Imperialism: Pioneer of Capitalism (New Left Books, London)
80.
WestphalL E, 1978, “The Republic of Korea's experience with export-led industrial development”World Developmet6(3) 347–382
81.
WestphalL EKimK S, 1982, “Korea” inDevelopment Strategies in Semi-Industrial Economies Ed. BalassaB, (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 212–279
82.
WheelwrightE L, 1980, “The new international division of labour in the age of the transnational corporation” inDevelopment Strategies in the EightiesFriedmannJWheelwrightTConnellJ, monograph 1, Development Studies Colloquium, Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney; pp 43–58
83.
WongK YChuP K Y, 1984, “Export processing zones and special economic zones as generators of economic development: The Asian experience”Geografiska Annaler66B1–16
84.
World Bank, 1983World Development Report 1983 (Oxford University Press, New York)
