Insights from literary theory are applied to the analysis of landscapes. It is suggested that the concepts of textuality, intertextuality, and reader reception may be of importance to those interested in the notion that landscapes are read in much the same way as literary texts. It is further suggested that landscapes can be seen as texts which are transformations of ideologies into a concrete form. This is an important way in which ideologies become naturalized. What is lacking in the radically relativistic theoretical perspective of much of twentieth-century literary theory, however, is a consideration of the sociohistorical and political processes through which meaning is produced and transformed. Examples of the relation between texts and landscapes from several different types of societies are then offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1981, “Homeownership and identity in capitalist societies”, in Housing and Identity: Cross-cultural Perspectives Ed. DuncanJ, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 60–97
AlthusserL, 1971Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (New Left Books, London)
4.
AndersonK, 1987, “‘Chinatown’ as a public nuisance: The power of place in the making of a racial category”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77580–598
5.
AndersonK, 1988, “Cultural hegemony and the race definition process in Chinatown, Vancouver 1880–1980”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6127–149
6.
BarthesR, 1975S/Z translated by MillerR, (Jonathan Cape, London)
7.
BarthesR, 1976The Pleasure of the Text translated by MillerR, (Jonathan Cape, London)
8.
BarthesR, 1977, “From work to text”, in Image–Music–Text: Roland Barthes Ed. HeathS, (Hill and Wang, New York) pp 155–164
9.
BarthesR, 1986, “The Blue Guide”, in Mythologies translated by LaversA, (Hill and Wang, New York) pp 74–77
10.
BellH C P, 1904, “Report on the Kegalla District” (Government Printer, Colombo)
11.
BelseyC, 1980Critical Practice (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
12.
BerndtR, 1983, “Images of God in Aboriginal Australia”Visible Religion214–39
13.
BerndtR, 1985–86, “Identification of deity through land: An Australian Aboriginal view”Visible Religion4–5266–275
14.
CullerJ, 1975Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
15.
CullerJ, 1976Ferdinand De Saussure (Penguin Books, New York)
16.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
17.
DerridaJ, 1978Writing and Difference (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
18.
DerridaJ, 1981Positions (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
19.
DowningA, 1850The Architecture of Country Houses (republished 1968 by Da Capo Press, New York)
20.
DuncanJ, forthcoming The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in Nineteenth Century Kandy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
21.
DuncanJDuncanN, 1984, “A cultural analysis of urban residential landscapes in North America: The case of the anglophile elite”, in The City in Cultural Context Eds AgnewJMercerJSopherD, (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 255–276
22.
DuncanN, 1986Suburban Landscapes and Suburbanities: A Structurationist Perspective on Residential Landuse in Northern Westchester County, New York unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
23.
EagletonT, 1983Literary Theory (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
24.
FishS, 1980Is There a Text in This Class? (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
25.
GunasekaraB, (Ed.), undated Ahalepola Varnanava/Waduga Hatuna can be consulted at the Ceylon Room of the University Library, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
26.
HarariJ, 1979, “Critical factions/critical fictions”, in Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-structural Criticism Ed. HarariJ, (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) pp 17–72
27.
HawkesT, 1977Structuralism and Semiotics (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
28.
IngardenR, 1973The Literary Work of Art (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL)
29.
IserW, 1978The Act of Reading (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
30.
JamesonF, 1972The Prison-house of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
OlmstedF WVauxC, 1868, “General plan of Riverside, Illinois, 1869”, reproduced 1972 in Frederick Law Olmsted and the American Environmental Tradition by FeinA, (George Braziller, New York) pp 84–85
33.
RicoeurP, 1971, “The model of text: Meaningful action considered as text”Social Research38529–562
34.
de SaussureF, 1959Course in General Linguistics (Philosophical Library, New York)
35.
SaidE, 1979Orientalism (Vintage Books, New York)
36.
SayerA, 1984Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Hutchinson, London)
37.
StockB, 1983The Implications of Literacy: Written Language and Models of Interpretation in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
38.
StockB, 1986, “Texts, readers, and enacted narratives”Visible Language20294–301
39.
TompkinsJ, 1980Reader Response Criticism: From Formalism to Poststructuralism (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
