In this paper the privatization of the planning profession is examined. The analysis proceeds with an exploration of how planners represent their profession through text and speech. Three kinds of rhetoric dominate discussion: a rhetoric of instrumentalism, which is concerned with reestablishing physical planning at the core of the discipline; a rhetoric of negotiation, which often loses sight of why negotiation was initiated in the first place; and a rhetoric of performance assessment, which is content with a planning which achieves its sponsors' goals. None of these concentrations is intrinsically wrong, but their cumulative effect has been to permit a commodification of the functions of planning, which has subsequently facilitated the privatization process. Other elements of planning, not susceptible to commodification, have been dropped from the discourse. One such loss has been the rhetoric of reform, which has traditionally connected planning with its progressive roots and political action. Also absent is a rhetoric of theory, which would permit comparative analysis of the meanings of a postmodern planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ACSP, 1986Guide to Graduate Education in PlanningAssociation of Collegiate Schools of Planning, School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201
2.
AscherAK, 1987The Politics of Privatisation (Macmillan, London)
3.
BaileyN, 1986, “What burden?”The Planner72(3) 31
4.
BaumH S, 1983Planners and Public Expectations (Schenkman, Cambridge, MA)
5.
BlowersA, 1986, “Town planning—paradoxes and prospects”The Planner72(4) 17
6.
BolanR S, 1980, “The practitioner as theorist”Journal of the American Planning Association46261–274
7.
BourdieuP, 1977Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
8.
BrehenyM J, 1983, “A practical view of planning theory”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design10101–115
9.
BrooksM, 1988, “Four critical junctures in the history of the urban planning profession”Journal of the American Planning Association54241–248
10.
ClarkG L, 1985Judges and Cities (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
11.
ClarkG LDearM, 1984State Apparatus: Structures and Language of Legitimacy (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
12.
DearM, 1986, “Postmodernism and planning”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4367–384
13.
DearM, 1988, “Reconstructing human geography: The postmodern challenge”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers13262–274
14.
DearMLawsG, 1986, “Anatomy of a decision: Recent land-use zoning appeals and their influence on group home location in Ontario”Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health5(1) 5–17
15.
DearMScottA, (Eds), 1981Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
16.
ForesterJ, 1980, “Critical theory and planning practice”Journal of the American Planning Association46275–286
17.
ForesterJ, 1987, “Teaching and studying planning practice”Journal of Planning Education and Research6(2) 116–137
18.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
19.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
20.
FysonA, 1987, “New country planning”The Planner73(5) 3
21.
GregoryD, 1987, “Postmodernism and the politics of social theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5245–248
22.
HallP, 1980Great Planning Disasters (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London)
23.
HallP, 1988Cities of Tomorrow (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
HallP, 1989, “The turbulent eighth decade”Journal of the American Planning Institute55275–282
25.
HarrisB, 1978, “A note on planning theory”Environment and Planning A10221–224
26.
KaufmanJ L, 1987, “Teaching planning students about strategizing boundary spanning and ethics”Journal of Planning Education and Research6(2) 108–115
27.
KnudsenT, 1988, “Success in planning”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12550–565
28.
KriegerM, 1981Advice and Planning (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
29.
LashSUrryJ, 1987The End of Organized Capitalism (Polity Press, Cambridge)
30.
LeGrandJRobinsonR, 1984Privatisation and the Welfare State (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
31.
MandelbaumS, 1987, “Open moral communities”, unpublished manuscript, available from MandelbaumS, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; page 25
32.
MaranhaoT, 1986Therapeutic Discourse and Socratic Dialogue (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
33.
McCloskeyD N, 1985The Rhetoric of Economics (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
34.
McDonicG, 1986, “Planning a positive service”The Planner72(3) 6
35.
MilroyB M, 1989, “Constructing and deconstructing plausibility”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7313–326
