A critical survey is offered of various recent positions in the theory of land rent. An attempt is made to strip rent discourse of those peculiarities that have alienated some of its potential audience, thereby turning the theory into the esoteric property of an academic coterie. The discussion of the last fifteen years is divided into three phases, namely consensus (in the 1970s), transition (at the turn of the decade), and rupture (in the 1980s). The typical beliefs, claims, and tenets of each phase are reconstructed and discussed, and the transition from one phase to another is analyzed. In order to facilitate and incite further discussion the present, that is third, phase is purposefully construed in terms of two rival lines of thought: the idiographic line (that denies the possibility of a general theory of land rent, advocating instead the analysis of concrete situations), and the nomothetic line (that searches for general laws). The first line is rejected in favour of the second.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlonsoW, 1960, “A theory of the urban land market”Papers and Proceedings, Regional Science Association6149–157
2.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 104–111
3.
AlonsoW, 1972, “A theory of the urban land market”, in Readings in Urban Economics Eds EdelMRothenbergJ, (Macmillan, New York) pp 380–403
4.
BallM, 1976, “Marx's theory of rent and the role of landed property”, DP-48, Birkbeck College, London
5.
BallM, 1977, “Differential rent and the role of landed property”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research1380–403
6.
BallM, 1980, “On Marx's theory of agricultural rent: A reply to Ben Fine”Economy and Society9304–326
7.
BallM, 1985a, “Land rent and the construction industry”, in Land Rent, Housing and Urban Planning: A European Perspective Eds BallMBentivegnaVEdwardsMFolinM, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 71–86
8.
BallM, 1985b, “The urban rent question”Environment and Planning A17503–525
9.
BallM, 1986, “The built environment and the urban question”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4447–464
10.
BallM, 1987, “Rent and social relations: A reply to Clark”Environment and Planning A19269–272
11.
BallMBentivegnaVEdwardsMFolinM, (Eds), 1985Land Rent, Housing and Urban Planning: A European Perspective (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
12.
BandyopadhyayP, 1982, “Marxist urban analysis and the economic theory of rent”Science and Society46162–196
13.
BassettKShortJ, 1980Housing and Residential Structure (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, Hants)
14.
BredeHDietrichBKohauptB, 1976Politische Ökonomie des Bodens und Wohnungsfrage (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
15.
BroadbentT A, 1975, “An attempt to apply Marx's theory of ground rent to the modern urban economy”, RP-17, Centre for Environmental Studies, London
16.
BruegelI, 1975, “The Marxist theory of rent and the contemporary city: A critique of Harvey”, in Political Economy and the Housing Question (CSE Books, London) pp 34–46
17.
ClarkSGinsburgN, 1976, “The political economy of housing”Kapitalistate4–566–99
18.
Darin-DrabkinH, 1965, “Seminar on the supply, development and allocation of land for housing and related purposes”, United Nations, Paris
19.
DiehlK, 1921David Ricardos Grundgesetzen der Volkswirtschaft und BesteuerungLeipzig
20.
EdelM, 1976, “Marx's theory of rent: Urban applications”Kapitalistate4–5100–124
21.
EdelM, 1977, “Rent theory and working class strategy: Marx, George and the urban crisis”The Review of Radical Political Economics91–15
22.
EdelMSclarELuriaD, 1984Shaky Palaces (Columbia University Press, New York)
23.
EmmanuelA, 1972Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade (Monthly Review Press, New York)
24.
FeaginJ, 1987, “The secondary circuit of capital: Office construction in Houston, Texas”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research11172–192
25.
FeaginJParkerR, 1989Building American Cities: The Urban Real Estate Game (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
26.
FineB, 1975Marx's Capital (Macmillan, London)
27.
FineB, 1979, “On Marx's theory of agricultural rent”Economy and Society8241–278
28.
FineB, 1980, “On Marx's theory of agricultural rent: A rejoinder”Economy and Society9327–331
29.
FineO, 1985, “Land, capital and the British coal industry prior to World War II”, in Land Rent, Housing and Urban Planning: A European Perspective Eds BallMBentivegnaVEdwardsMFolinM, (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent) pp 107–125
30.
GoodchildRMuntonR, 1985Development and the Landowner: An Analysis of the British Experience (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
31.
GottdienerM, 1985The Social Production of Urban Space (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX)
32.
GottdienerM, 1987, “Urbanization, consciousness and the limits of capital logic”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research11125–131
33.
HailaA, 1988, “Land as a financial asset: The theory of rent as a mirror of economic transformation”Antipode2079–101
34.
HailaA, 1989, “Misguided rhetoric on rent: A comment on Ball and Clark”Environment and Planning A211525–1532
35.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
36.
HarveyD, 1974, “Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution”Regional Studies8239–255
37.
HarveyD, 1978, “The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2101–131
38.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
39.
HarveyD, 1985The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
40.
HarveyD, 1987, “Three myths in search of a reality in urban studies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5367–376
41.
HarveyDChatterjeeL, 1974, “Absolute rent and the structuring of space by government and financial institutions”Antipode622–36
42.
HindessBHirstP Q, 1975Pre-capitalist Modes of Production (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, Hants)
43.
HoellG, 1974Die Grundrente und die Entwicklung des Kapitalismus in der Landwirtschaft (Dietz Verlag, Berlin)
44.
IveG, 1975, “Walker and the ‘new conceptual framework’ of urban rent”Antipode720–30
45.
KatzS, 1986, “Towards a sociological definition of rent: Notes on David Harvey's The Limits to Capital”Antipode1864–78
46.
LefebvreH, 1970Die Revolution der Städte (List Verlag, München)
47.
LipietzA, 1980, “The structuration of space, the problem of land, and spatial policy”, in Regions in Crisis Eds CarneyJHudsonRLewisJ, (St Martins Press, New York) pp 60–75
48.
MäkiU, 1987, “Explanation as redescription”, in Vom Werden des Wissens: Philosphie–Wissenschaft–Dialektik Eds HolzHManninenJ, (Pahl-Rugenstein, Cologne) pp 109–115
49.
MarxK, 1968Theories of Surplus Value, Volume II (Progress Publishers, Moscow)
50.
MarxK, 1971Capital, Volume III (Progress Publishers, Moscow)
51.
MasseyDCatalanoA, 1978Capital and Land, Landownership by Capital in Great Britain (Edward Arnold, London)
52.
MillsE, 1972Urban Economics (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL)
53.
MurrayR, 1978, “Value and theory of rent”Capital and Classnumber 4, 11–13
54.
MuthR F, 1969Cities and Housing (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
55.
NeefR, 1974Die ökonomische Verwertung städtischen Bodens und ihre Wirkung auf die Stadtentwicklung (Lahn, Marburg)
56.
Nell-BreuningO, 1965, “Die Preisbildung am Baubodenmarkt”So Planen und Bauen
57.
NeutzeG M, 1973The Price of Land and Land Use Planning: Policy Instruments in the Urban Land Market (OECD, Paris)
58.
Postel-VinayG, 1974La rente fonciere dans le capitalisme agricole (Maspéro, Paris)
59.
ReyP-P, 1973Les alliances de classes (Maspéro, Paris)
60.
RicardoD, 1817, “On the principles of political economy and taxation”, reprinted in 1951 as volume 1 of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo Ed. SraffaP, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
61.
RoweisS, 1986, Review of Land Rent, Housing and Urban Planning: A European Perspective Eds BallMBentivegnaVEdwardsMFolinM, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research10123–126
62.
RyndinaMChernikovG, (Eds), 1974The Political Economy of Capitalism (Progress Publishers, Moscow)
63.
ScottA J, 1976, “Land and land rent: An interpretative review of the French literature”Progress in Geography9102–145
64.
ScottA J, 1979, “Land use and commodity production”, in Philosophy in Geography Eds GaleSOlssonG, (D Reidel, Dordrecht) pp 345–359
65.
ScottA J, 1980The Urban Land Nexus and the State (Pion, London)
66.
SkourasA, 1980, “Land and its taxation as issues in economic theory: What is the reason for their eclipse?”The American Journal of Economics and Sociology39373–382
67.
SmirnowIWinogradowJ, 1973, “Die Grundrente”, in Geschichte der politischen Ökonomie des Sozialismus Eds TrifonowDSchirokoradL, (Verlag die Wirtschaft, Berlin) pp 285–296
68.
TribeK, 1977, “Economic property and the theorisation of ground rent”Economy and Society669–88
69.
VygodskiV, 1973The Story of a Great Discovery (Verlag die Wirtschaft, Berlin)
70.
WagnerA, 1926Grundrente und Preishöhe. Ein kritischer Beitrag zur nationalökonomischen TheorieMarburg
71.
WalkerR, 1974, “Urban ground rent: Building a new conceptual framework”Antipode651–58
72.
WalkerR, 1975, “Contentious issues in Marxian value and rent theory: A second and longer look”Antipode731–53
73.
WalkerR, 1982, “A theory of suburbanization: Capitalism and the construction of urban space in the United States”, in Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society Eds DearMScottA J, (Methuen, New York) pp 383–429
74.
ZelenyiJ, 1970Die Wissenschaftslogik bei Marx und Das Kapital (Akademie Verlag, Berlin)
