Recent discussion in human geography has heightened awareness of the problems and possibilities of the use of social theory in empirical research, This paper is concerned with showing how insights from feminist theory and Giddens's theory of structuration informed a study focusing on women's mothering practices in a Canadian suburb. In concert these approaches cast attention to the implications of recognizing subjects as knowledgeable human agents in analyses of social and economic change. These include a renewed emphasis on the ‘everyday’ and its links with general processes, an interest in methods appropriate for investigating the generation of meanings central to our social and spatial worlds, and the need to incorporate women's experiences in the construction of theoretical knowledge. Included in a new research agenda within feminist geography are questions concerning the active construction of gender identities through practices which vary over time and space. In the study reported the meaning of the domestic workplace to mothers of young children was explored. It is shown how the notion of motherhood and the sets of practices making up mothering work were interpreted and negotiated as women responded to social and economic structuring in a particular place. The paper includes a concluding discussion on the links between the theoretical underpinnings of the study and its empirical findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnyonJ, 1983, “Intersections of gender and class: Accommodation and resistance by working-class and affluent females to contradictory sex-role ideologies”, in Gender, Class and Education Eds WalkerSBartonL, (Falcon Press, Lewes, Sussex) pp 19–37
2.
BarnesT J, 1987, “Homo economicus, physical metaphors, and universal models in economic geography”The Canadian Geographer31299–308
3.
BarrettM, 1980Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis (New Left Books, London)
4.
BoultonM G, 1983On Being a Mother (Tavistock Publications, Andover, Hants)
5.
BowlbyS RFoordJMcDowellL, 1986, “The place of gender in locality studies”Area18327–331
6.
BrownillS, 1984, “From critique to intervention: Socialist-feminist perspectives on urbanization”Antipode16 (3) 21–34
7.
CairncrossF, 1986, “The vulnerable workforce”Times Literary Supplement 4 April, 349–351
8.
Canada, 1986Report of the Task Force on Child CareStatus for Women (Canada Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa)
9.
ChodorowN, 1978Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
10.
ChouinardV, 1988, “Explaining local experiences of state formation the case of cooperative housing in Toronto”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space651–68
11.
CookeP N, 1987, “Individuals, localities, and postmodernism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5408–412
DavidM, 1984, “Women, family and education”, in World Yearbook of Education 1984: Women and Education Eds AckerSMegarryJNisbetSHoyleE, (Kogan Page, London) pp 191–201
14.
DuncanJ SLeyD, 1982, “Structural marxism and human geography: A critical assessment”Annals of the Association of American Geographers7230–59
15.
DyckI, 1988Towards a Geography of Motherhood: The Constitution of Safe Spaces for Children unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
16.
DyckI, 1989, “Integrating home and wage workplace: Women's daily lives in a Canadian suburb”The Canadian Geographer33329–341
17.
FelskiR, 1989, “Feminist theory and social change”Theory, Culture and Society6219–240
18.
FincherR, 1987, “Social theory and the future of urban geography”Professional Geographer399–12
19.
FoordJGregsonN, 1986, “Patriarchy: Towards a reconceptualisation”Antipode18186–210
20.
GiddensA, 1976New Rules of Sociological Method (Hutchinson, London)
21.
GiddensA, 1979Central Problems in Social Theory (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
22.
GiddensA, 1982Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory (Macmillan, London)
23.
GiddensA, 1983, “Comments on the theory of structuration”Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior1375–80
24.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society (Polity Press, Cambridge)
25.
GiddensA, 1985, “Time, space and regionalisation”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ, (Macmillan, London) pp 265–295
26.
GiddensA, 1987Social Theory and Modern Sociology (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
27.
GregoryD, 1982Regional Transformation and Industrial Revolution (Macmillan, London)
28.
GregoryD, 1985, “Presences and absences”, seminar given to the Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, October 1985; copy available from the author at the same address
29.
GregoryD, 1987, “Postmodernism and the politics of social theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5245–248
30.
GregsonN, 1987, “Structuration theory: Some thoughts on the possibilities for empirical research”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space573–91
31.
GVRD, 1980The Livable Region; from the 70s to the 80s (Greater Vancouver Regional District, Planning Department, Vancouver)
32.
HardwickW G, 1974Vancouver (Collier Macmillan Canada, Don Mills)
33.
HuntP, 1980Gender and Class Consciousness (Macmillan, London)
34.
KlausnerD, 1986, “Beyond separate spheres: Linking production, social reproduction and consumption”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space429–40
35.
Labour Canada, 1986Woman in the Labour Force (Canada Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa)
36.
LeyD, 1980, “Liberal ideology and the postindustrial city”Annals of the Association of American Geographers70238–258
37.
LioyM, 1975Social Trends in Greater Vancouver (Social Policy and Research Department, United Way of Greater Vancouver, Vancouver)
38.
McDowellL, 1983, “Towards an understanding of the gender division of urban space”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space159–72
39.
McDowellLMasseyD, 1984, “A woman's place?”, in Geography Matters! Eds MasseyDAllenJ, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 128–147
40.
MackenzieS, 1986, “Women's responses to economic restructuring: Changing gender, changing space”, in The Politics of Diversity Eds HamiltonRBarrettM, (Verso, London) pp 81–100
41.
MackenzieSRoseD, 1983, “Industrial change, the domestic economy and home life”, in Redundant Spaces in Cities and Regions? Studies in Industrial Decline and Social Change Eds AndersonJDuncanSHudsonR, IBG Special Publication 15 (Academic Press, London) pp 155–200
42.
MoosA IDearM J, 1986, “Structuration theory in urban analysis: 1. theoretical exegesis”Environment and Planning A18231–252
43.
PahlRWallaceC, 1983, “Household work strategies and the polarisations and divisions of work practices”, in Beyond Employment Eds RedcliftNMingioneE, (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 189–227
44.
PredA, 1984, “Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places”Annals of the Association of American Geographers74279–297
45.
RoseC, 1987, “The problem of reference and geographic structuration”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space593–106
46.
RothmanS M, 1978Woman's Proper Place: A History of Changing Ideals and Practices, 1870 to the Present (Basic Books, New York)
47.
SayerA, 1983, “What kind of marxism for what kind of feminism?”, in Meeting of Minds? Feminism and Modes of Geographical Thought Proceedings of a meeting of the IBG Women and Geography Study Group, 14 May, pp 13–17; copy available from the author School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex
48.
SayerA, 1984Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Hutchinson, London)
49.
SojaE W, 1987, “The postmodernization of geography: A review”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77289–323
50.
Statistics Canada, 1986Women in the Work PlaceDepartment of Employment and Immigration (Canada Government Publishing Centre, Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa)
51.
ThorneB, 1987, “Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children”Gender and Society185–109
52.
ThriftN J, 1983, “On the determination of social action in space and time”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space123–57
53.
ThriftN J, 1985, “Bear and mouse or bear and tree? Anthony Giddens's reconstitution of social theory”Sociology19609–623
54.
TietjenA M, 1985, “The social networks and social support of married and single mothers in Sweden”Journal of Marriage and the Family47489–496
55.
TiversJ, 1985Women Attached: The Daily Lives of Women with Young Children (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
56.
UrryJWardeA, 1985, “Introduction”, in Localities, Class and Gender The Lancaster Regionalism Group (Pion, London) pp 1–12
