In this paper I look at how the discovery of remnants contributes to creating new spaces in the city. I use the geological metaphor of brecciation drawing upon the work of Sigmund Freud to elaborate on how materials from the past and the present are jumbled in a nonlinear fashion to enable spatial multiplicity. I then illustrate these ideas through the case study of the Sala Trevi/Mondadori building in Rome which exemplifies the ongoing dynamics of the play of surfaces and depths when remnants are featured as part of the design. This is done by outlining ways in which the building unfolds spatial and material juxtapositions, and by elaborating on three elements that are indicative of the metaphor of brecciation. I conclude that when material and spatial entanglements occur, the metaphor of brecciation goes further than the metaphor of the palimpsest in facilitating spatial transformation in the city: spaces can be modified and create new possibilities with the past, enabling tensions to coexist in the present whilst not limiting reconfiguration in the future.
AgnewJ, 1998, “The impossible capital: monumental Rome under liberal and fascist regimes, 1870–1943”Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography80229–240
3.
AgnewJ, 2010, “‘Ghosts of Rome’: the haunting of Fascist efforts at remaking Rome as Italy's capital city”Annali d'Italianistica28179–198
4.
AllenJ, 2007, “The cultural spaces of Siegfried Kracauer: the many surfaces of Berlin”New Formations6120–33
5.
AndersonBWylieJ, 2009, “On geography and materiality”Environment and Planning A41318–335
6.
AtkinsonDCosgroveD, 1998, “Urban rhetoric and embodied identities: city, nation, and empire at the Vittorio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870–1945”Annals of the Association of American Geographers8828–49
BurginV, 1996In/different Spaces: Place and Memory in Visual Culture (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
14.
ClarkN, 2010Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet (Sage, London)
15.
CochraneA, 2006, “Making up meanings in a capital city: power, memory and monuments in Berlin”European Urban and Regional Studies135–24
16.
CollinsonJ DThompsonD B, 1982Sedimentary Structures (Allen and Unwin, London)
17.
CrangM, 1996, “Envisioning urban histories: Bristol as palimpsest, postcards, and snapshots”Environment and Planning A28429–452
18.
CrangMTravlouP S, 2001, “The city and topologies of memory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19161–177
19.
Della PortellaI, 2002Subterranean Rome (Arsenale, Verona)
20.
EdensorT, 2005Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics, and Materiality (Berg, Oxford)
21.
ForestBJohnsonJTillK, 2004, “Post-totalitarian national identity: public memory in Germany and Russia”Social and Cultural Geography5357–380
22.
ForteyR A, 2004The Earth: An Intimate History (HarperCollins, London)
23.
FousekiKSandesC, 2009, “Private preservation versus public presentation: the conservation for display in in situ fragmentary archaeological remains in London and Athens”Papers from the Institute of Archaeology1937–54
24.
FreudS, 1985[1930], “Civilization and its discontents”, in Civilization, Society and Religion, Group Psychology, Civilization and its Discontents and Other Works, Volume 12 (Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middx) pp 251–340
25.
FreudS, 2003[1920], “Beyond the pleasure principle”, in Beyond the Pleasure Principle and Other Writings (Penguin, London) pp 43–102
26.
FreudS, 2003[1923], “The Ego and the Id”, in Beyond the Pleasure Principle and Other Writings (Penguin, London) pp 103–150
27.
FreudSStracheyJGayP, 1989Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (1915–1917) (Norton, New York)
28.
GolanyG SOjimaT, 1996Geo-space Urban Design (John Wiley, New York)
29.
González-RuibalA, 2011, “In praise of depth”Archaeological Dialogues18164–168
30.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
31.
GranickH, 1991[1947] Underneath New York (Fordham University Press, New York)
32.
HarrisonR, 2011a, “Surface assemblages: towards an archaeology in and of the present”Archaeological Dialogues18141–161
33.
HarrisonR, 2011b, “Archaeologies ‘now’: creative interventions in the present for the future”Archaeological Dialogues18180–196
HerzfeldM, 2009Evicted From Eternity: The Restructuring of Modern Rome (University of Chicago Press, London)
37.
HillsE S, 1972Elements of Structural Geology2nd edition (Chapman and Hall, London)
38.
HuyssenA, 2003Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
39.
InsalacoA, 2005La Città dell'Acqua: Archeologia Sotterranea a Fontana di Trevi2nd edition (Electa, Milan)
40.
JokilehtoJ, 1999A History of Architectural Conservation (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford)
41.
KhirfanL, 2010, “Traces on the palimpsest: heritage and the urban forms of Athens and Alexandria”Cities27315–325
42.
KungolosA GBrebbiaC ABeriatosE (Eds) 2005Sustainable Development and Planning II, Volume 1 (WIT Press, Southampton, Hants)
43.
LaddB, 1997The Ghosts of Berlin: Confronting German History in the Urban Landscape (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
44.
LatourB, 2007Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
45.
LeesL, 2002, “Rematerializing geography: the ‘new’ urban geography”Progress in Human Geography26101–112
46.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford)
47.
LoukakiA, 2008Living Ruins, Value Conflicts (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
48.
MacdonaldS, 2006, “Words in stone? Agency and identity in a Nazi landscape”Journal of Material Culture11(1–2) 105–126
49.
MacdonaldS, 2009, “Reassembling Nuremburg, reassembling heritage”Journal of Cultural Economy2117–134
50.
MadginR, 2010, “Reconceptualising the historic urban environment: conservation and regeneration in Castlefield, Manchester, 1960–2009”Planning Perspectives2529–48
51.
MariL, 2009, “Sbarca a Fontana di Trevi il nuovo Harry's Bar”La Repubblica 24 April, page VII
52.
MasseyD, 2005For Space (Sage, London)
53.
MasseyD, 2006, “Landscape as a provocation: reflections on moving mountains”Journal of Material Culture11(1–2) 33–48
54.
MiddletonDBrownS D, 2005The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting (Sage, London)
55.
MillerD, 2005Materiality (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
56.
MillerD, 2008The Comfort of Things (Polity Press, Cambridge)
57.
MumfordL, 1961The City in History: its Origins, its Transformations and its Prospects (Secker and Warburg, London)
58.
NixonT J P (Ed.), 2004, “Preserving archaeological remains in situ?”, proceedings of the 2nd Conference 12–14 September 2001, Museum of London Archaeology Service, English Heritage
59.
NoraP, 1984–1992Les Lieux de Mémoire (Gallimard, Paris)
60.
Oter-PailosJ, 2008, “Mnemonic value and historic preservation”, in Spatial Recall: Memory in Architecture and Landscape Ed. TreibM (Routledge, London, New York) pp 240–259
61.
PaviaC, 2000Guide to Underground Rome: From Cloaca Massima to Domus Aurea, the Most Fascinating Underground Sites of the Capital (Gangemi, Rome)
62.
PileS, 2002, “Memory and the city”, in Temporalities, Autobiography and Everyday Life Eds CampbellJHarbordJ (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 111–127
63.
RicciA, 1996I Mali dell'Abondanza: Considerazioni Impolitiche sui Beni Culturali (Lithos, Rome)
64.
RicoeurP, 2004Memory, History, Forgetting (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
65.
RobertsonIHallT, 2007“Memory, identity and the memorialization of conflict in the Scottish Highlands”, in Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity: New Perspectives on the Cultural Landscape Eds WhelanYMooreN (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 19–36
66.
RodwellD, 2007Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities (Blackwell, Oxford)
67.
SandulliM A (Ed.), 2006Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio (Giuffrè, Milano)
68.
SassenS, 2001The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
69.
SerresM, 1980Le Parasite (Grasset, Paris)
70.
SuppeJ, 1985Principles of Structural Geology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
71.
TaitMWhileA, 2009, “Ontology and the conservation of built heritage”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27721–737
72.
ThomasJ, 2011, “Sigmund Freud's archaeological metaphor and archaeology's self-understanding”, in Contemporary Archaeologies: Excavating Now2nd edition, Ed. HoltorfCPicciniA (Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main) pp 33–45
73.
TillK E, 2005The New Berlin: Memory, Politics, Place (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
74.
TrenchRHillmanE, 1994London under London: A Subterranean Guide2nd edition (Murray, London)
75.
Von MeissPRaduF (Eds), 2004Vingt Mille Lieux sous les Terres (Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne)
76.
WhileAShortM, 2011, “Place narratives and heritage management: the modernist legacy in Manchester”Area434–13
77.
WilliamsR, 1990Notes on the Underground: An Essay on Technology, Society and the Imagination (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
78.
WitcherRTolia-KellyD PHingleyR, 2010, “Archaeologies of landscape: excavating the materialities of Hadrian's Wall”Journal of Material Culture15105–128
