Despite decades of water-supply development programs in the Global South, their effect on gendered access to water remains both unclear and contradictory. This paper addresses this lacuna by examining the expansion of a rural water-supply network aimed at reducing household water scarcity in the arid zone of Rajasthan, India. Specifically, the Indira Gandhi Canal was conceived and constructed during the green revolution to ‘green the Thar Desert’. But now, through a complex network of reservoirs, treatment facilities, distribution centers, and supply pipelines, it connects much of rural and urban western Rajasthan to a drinking water-supply network. The paper examines the interaction of water-supply technologies, social power relations and dynamic socioecological change operating within these development processes. To do so it draws on household surveys, interviews with water users and government engineers, and participant observation with women and children water collectors. The paper finds that this ongoing water development project rendered the water provision landscape technical on the surface, but that uneven flows of water between villages and people reveal a more complex water provision landscape. The expansion of the network based on a technical reimagining of water supply has resulted in intervillage scarcity, intragender differential access, usurious private water markets, the abandonment and then the proposed rehabilitation of traditional water bodies, and urban water logging. In the conclusion I argue for a rethinking of water-supply development programs through a political ecology approach that focuses on the emergent capacities of water-supply technologies to redirect existing socioecological associations in unanticipated ways. Looking at the relationship between nature—society and technology may illuminate the possible ruptures in these associations and the ways that they may be rearticulated to produce less differentiating modes of accessing water.
AdamsW MWatsonE EMutisoS K, 1997, “Water, rules and gender: Water rights in an indigenous irrigation system, Marakwet, Kenya”Development and Change28707–730
2.
AhlersRZwarteveenM, 2009, “The water question in feminism: Water control and gender inequities in a neo-liberal era”Gender, Place and Culture16409–426
3.
BakkerKBridgeG, 2006, “Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’”Progress in Human Geography305–27
4.
BirkenholtzT, 2008, “Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Indian groundwater practices”Geoforum39466–482
5.
BirkenholtzT, 2009a, “Irrigated landscapes, produced scarcity, and adaptive social institutions in Rajasthan, India”Annals of the Association of American Geographers99118–137
6.
BirkenholtzT, 2009b, “Groundwater governmentality: Hegemony and technologies of resistance in Rajasthan's (India) groundwater governance”Geographical Journal175208–220
7.
BirkenholtzT, 2010, “‘Full cost recovery’: Producing differentiated water collection practices and responses to centralized water networks in Jaipur, India”Environment and Planning A422238–2253
8.
BlackmanJ, 1994, “Gender in historical and development studies: An agenda for the 1990s”Journal of Gender Studies35–14
9.
BrownA M, 2006, “WID and GAD in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Reappraising gender planning approaches in theory and practice”Journal of Women, Politics and Policy2857–83
CarneyJ A, 2001Black Rice: The African Origins of Rice Cultivation in the Americas (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
12.
CastreeN, 2002, “False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks”Antipode34111–146
13.
CleaverF, 1998, “[Introduction to a special issue on] Choice, complexity, and change: Gendered livelihoods and the management of water”Agriculture and Human Values15293–299
14.
ColesAWallaceT, 2005, “Gender, water and development: An introduction”, in Gender, Water and Development Ed. ColesAWallaceT (Berg, Oxford) pp 1–20
15.
CookeBKothariU, 2001Participation: The New Tyranny? (Zed Books, London)
16.
DavidsonJStratfordE, 2007, “En(gender)ing the debate about water's management and care—views from the Antipodes”Geoforum38815–827
17.
DeVriesP, 2007, “Don't compromise your desire for development! A Lacanian/Deleuzian rethinking of the anti-politics machine”Third World Quarterly2825–43
18.
Directorate of Census Operations, 2001District Census Handbook—JaipurCensus Operations Rajasthan, Jaipur
19.
EscobarA, 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
20.
FergusonJ, 1994The Anti-politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
21.
FineB, 2005, “From actor-network theory to political economy”Capitalism Nature Socialism1691–108
22.
GandyM, 2002Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
GandyM, 2008, “Landscapes of disaster: Water, modernity, and urban fragmentation in Mumbai”Environment and Planning A40108–130
24.
GardinerV, 1987, “The Indira Gandhi Canal, Rajasthan, India”Geography72251–252
25.
GideonJ, 2006, “Integrating gender interests into health policy”Development and Change37329–352
26.
GoldmanM JNadasdyPTurnerM D, 2011Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
27.
Government of India, 2008National Action Plan on Climate ChangePrime Minister's Council on Climate Change, New Delhi
28.
HarrisL M, 2006, “Irrigation, gender, and social geographies of the changing waterscapes of southeastern Anatolia”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24187–213
29.
HarrisL M, 2008, “Water rich, resource poor: Intersections of gender, poverty, and vulnerability in newly irrigated areas of Southeastern Turkey”World Development362643–2662
30.
HarrisL M, 2009, “Gender and emergent water governance: Comparative overview of neoliberalized natures and gender dimensions of privatization, devolution and marketization”Gender, Place and Culture16387–408
31.
HawkinsRSeagerJ, 2010, “Gender and water in Mongolia”The Professional Geographer6216–31
32.
HeynenNMcCarthyJPrudhamSRobbinsP, 2007Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences (Routledge, London)
33.
IngramM, 2011, “Fermentation, rot, and other human—microbial performances”, in Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies Eds GoldmanM JNadasdyPTurnerM D (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 99–112
34.
IWMI, 2009, “Strategic analyses of the National River Linking Project (NRLP) of India Series 5”Proceedings of the Second National Workshop on Strategic Issues in Indian Irrigation, New Delhi, India, 8–9 AprilInternational Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, page 367
35.
JeffreyC, 2001, “‘A fist is stronger than five fingers’: Caste and dominance in rural north India”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26217–236
36.
JeffreyCJeffreyPJeffreyR, 2008Degrees Without Freedom: Education, Masculinities, and Unemployment in North India (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
37.
KaikaM, 2005City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City (Routledge, New York)
38.
KaikaM, 2006, “Dams as symbols of modernization: The urbanization of nature between geographical imagination and materiality”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96276–301
39.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE, 2000, “Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24120–138
40.
KirschSMitchellD, 2004, “The nature of things: Dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism”Antipode36687–705
41.
LatourB, 2000Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
42.
LawJ, 2004After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (Routledge, New York)
43.
LeachM, 2007, “Earth mother myths and other ecofeminist fables: How a strategic notion rose and fell”Development and Change3867–85
44.
LiT M, 2007The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
45.
LoftusA, 2006, “Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter”Antipode381023–1045
46.
LoftusA, 2007, “Working the socio-natural relations of the urban waterscape in South Africa”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3141–59
47.
LoftusA, 2009, “Rethinking political ecologies of water”Third World Quarterly30953–968
48.
McFarlaneC, 2008a, “Governing the contaminated city: Infrastructure and sanitation in colonial and post-colonial Bombay”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32415–435
49.
McFarlaneC, 2008b, “Sanitation in Mumbai's informal settlements: State, ‘slum’, and infrastructure”Environment and Planning A4088–107
50.
MarchandM HParpartJ L, 1995Feminism Postmodernism Development (Routledge, New York)
51.
MitchellT, 2002Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
52.
NationM, forthcoming, “Understanding women's participation in irrigated agriculture: A case study from Senegal”Agriculture and Human Values
53.
O'ReillyK, 2004, “Developing contradictions: Women's participation as a site of struggle within an Indian NGO”The Professional Geographer56174–184
54.
O'ReillyK, 2006, “‘Traditional’ women, ‘modern’ water: Linking gender and commodification in Rajasthan, India”Geoforum37958–972
55.
O'ReillyK, 2007, “‘Where the knots of narrative are tied and untied’: The dialogic production of gendered development spaces in north India”Annals of the Association of American Geographers97613–634
56.
O'ReillyK, 2010, “The promise of patronage: Adapting and adopting neoliberal development”Antipode42179–200
57.
O'ReillyKHalvorsonSSultanaFLaurieN, 2009, “Introduction: Global perspectives on gender—water geographies”Gender, Place and Culture16381–385
58.
OzaR, 2006The Making of Neoliberal India: Nationalism, Gender, and the Paradoxes of Globalization (Routledge, New York)
59.
PageB, 2005, “Naked power: Women and the social production of water in anglophone Cameroon”, in Gender, Water and Development Ed. ColesAWallaceT (Berg, Oxford) pp 57–74
60.
PhadkeR, 2011, “Reclaiming the technological imagination: Water, power, and place in India”, in Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies Eds GoldmanM JNadasdyPTurnerM D (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 244–262
61.
RamanathanS, 1991, “Rajasthan's sorrow: Report of Workshop on Indira Gandhi Canal”Economic and Political Weekly261842–1844
62.
RayI, 2007, “Women, water, and development”Annual Review of Environment and Resources32421–449
63.
RayGAtreyaV, 1998, “Variation in shoulder and hip joint axis in relation to vertebral column axis and changes in spinal curvature while carrying water by head, shoulder and waist mode”, in Global Ergonomics Eds ScottP ACharterisJBridgerR S (Elsevier, Oxford) pp 91–98
64.
RazaviS, 1997, “Fitting gender into development institutions”World Development251111–1125
65.
RibotJ CPelusoN L, 2003, “A theory of access”Rural Sociology68153–181
66.
RobbinsP, 2001, “Fixed categories in a portable landscape: The causes and consequences of landcover categorization”Environment and Planning A33161–179
67.
RocheleauDRothR, 2007, “Rooted networks, relational webs and powers of connection: Rethinking human and political ecologies”Geoforum38433–437
68.
RocheleauDThomas-SlayterBWangariE, 1996Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences (Routledge, London)
69.
SchroederR A, 1997, “‘Re-claiming’ land in the Gambia: Gendered property rights and environmental intervention”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87487–508
70.
SchroederR A, 1999Shady Practices: Agroforestry and Gender Politics in the Gambia (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
71.
ScottJ C, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
72.
SeagerJ, 2010, “Gender and water: Good rhetoric, but it doesn't ‘count’”Geoforum411–3
73.
SenA, 1999Development as Freedom (Anchor Books, New York)
74.
ShivaV, 1989Staying Alive: Development, Ecology and Women (Zed Books, London)
75.
SparkeM, 1998, “A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation”Annals of the Association of American Geographers88463–495
76.
SultanaF, 2009a, “Community and participation in water resources management: Gendering and naturing development debates from Bangladesh”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series34346–363
77.
SultanaF, 2009b, “Fluid lives: Subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh”Gender, Place and Culture16427–444
78.
SwyngedouwE, 1999, “Modernity and hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89443–465
79.
SwyngedouwE, 2004Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
80.
UN, 2010The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010 (United Nations, New York)
81.
ZwarteveenM ZMeinzen-DickR S, 2001, “Gender and property rights in the commons: Examples of water rights in South Asia”Agriculture and Human Values1811–25
