Robert Young's book White Mythologies raises some critical questions of importance to geography, Amongst these are the significant links between the critique of Western historicism and the increasing use of spatial names and metaphors in arguments about cultural politics. Young's sweeping criticisms of Marxism are powerful, but they loose sight of the value of work which attends to politico-economic processes while problematising the limits of marxism's meta-narrative. Young's writing is limited itself. It introduces work that breaks with Westem-centrism, but, as it does so, it sometimes falls prey to a form of ‘new’ Orientalism that manipulates and represents such work in the interests of ‘the West’, These limits to the book provide an example of anemic geography. This reified and reifying geography fails to deal adequately with the questions of geographical complexity opened up by the displacement of Western History. Instead, it clokes them beneath the use of a geographical vocabulary employed as a vehicle in the metaphorisation of political debate. Alternatives are possible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonA, 1992, “Cryptonormativism and double gestures: The politics of post-structuralism”Critical Inquiry21(1) 63–95
2.
AppiahK A, 1991, “Is the post- in postmodernism the post- in postcolonial?”Critical Inquiry17(2) 236–257
3.
AsadT, 1990, “Multiculturalism and British identity in the wake of the Rushdie affair”Politics and Society18(4) 454–480
4.
BenningtonGYoungR, 1987, “Introduction: Posing the question”, in Post-structuralism and the Question of History Eds AttridgeDBenningtonGYoungR (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–9
5.
BhabhaH, 1983, “Difference, discrimination and the discourse of colonialism”, in The Politics of Theory Eds BakerFHulmePIversenMLoxleyD (University of Essex, Colchester, Essex) pp 194–211
6.
BhabhaH, 1984, “Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse”October28125–133
7.
BhabhaH K, 1988, “The commitment to theory”New Formations5 (Spring) 5–23
8.
BhabhaH K, 1990, “Articulating the archaic: Notes on colonial nonsense”, in Literary Theory Today Eds. CollierPGeyer-RyanH (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) pp 203–218
9.
CorriganP, 1991, “My place or yours? Particular philosophies from whose stories (vernacular values revisited)”Journal of Historical Geography17(3) 313–318
10.
DavisM, 1985, “Urban renaissance and the spirit of postmodernism”New Left Review151106–113
11.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology translated by SpivakG C (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
12.
DerridaJ, 1981Positions translated by BassA (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
13.
DerridaJ, 1982a, “White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy”, in Margins of Philosophy translated by BassA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 207–271
14.
DerridaJ, 1982b, “The ends of man”, in Margins of Philosophy translated by BassA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 109–136
15.
DerridaJ, 1984, “Dialogue with Jacques Derrida”, in Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers: The Phenomenological Heritage Ed. KearneyR (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 105–126
16.
DirksN B, 1992, “Castes of mind”Representations3756–78
17.
DriverF, 1991, “Morality, politics, geography: Brave new worlds”, in New Words, New Worlds”: Reconceptualising Social and Cultural Geography compiled by PhiloC (Cambrian Printers, Aberystwyth) pp 61–64
18.
ElsonD, 1979, “The value theory of labour”, in Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism Ed. ElsonD (CSE Books, London) pp 115–180
19.
FreshfieldD W, 1904, “On mountains and mankind”Geographical Journal24443–460
20.
GaschéR, 1986The Tain in the Mirror: Derrida and the Philosophy of Reflection (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
GuptaAFergusonJ, 1992, “Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference”Cultural Anthropology7(1) 6–23
23.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
HooksB, 1992, “Representing whiteness in the black imagination”, in Cultural Studies Eds GrossbergLNelsonCTreichlerP (Routledge, New York) pp 338–346
25.
HugganG, 1989, “Decolonising the map: Post colonialism, post-structuralism and the cartographic connection”Ariel20(4) 115–131
26.
JardineL, 1986, “Girl talk (for boys on the Left), on marginalizing feminist critical praxis”The Oxford Literary Review8(1–2) 208–217
27.
JayM, 1991, “The textual approach to intellectual history”Strategies4/57–19
28.
LoombaA, 1991, “Overworlding the Third World”The Oxford Literary Review13(1–2) 164–191
29.
LugonesM, 1987, “Playfullness, world-travelling, and loving perception”Hypatia2(2) 3–19
30.
MarxK, 1973, “The future results of the British rule in India”, in Surveys from Exile Ed. FernbachD (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
31.
MarxKEngelsF, 1938The German Ideology Ed. PascalR (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
32.
MohantyC T, 1991a, “Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses”, in Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism Eds MohantyC TRussoATorresL (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 51–80
33.
MohantyC T, 1991b, “Cartographies of struggle: Third World women and the politics of feminism” in Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism Eds. MohantyC TRussoATorresL (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 1–47
34.
ParryB, 1987, “Problems in current theories of colonial discourse”The Oxford Literary Review9(1–2) 27–58
35.
RichA, 1986, “Notes toward a politics of location”, in Bloody Bread and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979–1985 (W W Norton, New York)
36.
RogersA, 1991, “The boundaries of reason: Social and cultural geography and the world”, in New Words, New Worlds: Reconceptualising Social and Cultural Geography compiled by PhiloC (Cambrian Printers, Aberystwyth) pp 131–143
37.
RyanM, 1982Marxism and Deconstruction: A Critical Articulation (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
38.
SaidE W, 1978Orientalism (Vintage Books, New York)
39.
SinterD, 1992, “Theories of development and politics of the postmodern—exploring a border zone”Development and Change23(3) 283–319
40.
SpivakG C, 1976, “Translator's preface”, in Derrida, 1976, pp ix–lxxxvii
41.
SpivakG C, 1987, “Speculations on reading Marx; after reading Dcrrida”, in Post-structuralism and the Question of History Eds AttridgeDBenningtonGYoungR (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 30–62
42.
SpivakG C, 1988a, “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 271–313
43.
SpivakG C, 1988bIn Other World: Essays in Cultural Politics (Routledge, New York)
44.
SpivakG C, 1990aThe Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies and Dialogues Ed. HarasymS (Routledge, New York)
45.
SpivakG C, 1990b, “Poststructuralism, marginality, postcoloniality and value”, in Literary Theory Today Eds CollierPGeyer-RyanH (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) pp 219–244
46.
SpivakG CYoungR, 1991, “Neocolonialism and the secret agent of knowledge”The Oxford Literary Review13(1–2) 220–251
47.
SuleriS, 1992, “Women skin deep: Feminism and the postcolonial condition”Critical Inquiry18(4) 756–769
48.
TandcciarzS, 1991, “Reading Gayatri Spivak's Trench feminism in an international frame': A problem for theory”Genders10 (Spring) 75–92
49.
TrinhT M-H, 1989Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN)
50.
YoungR, 1982, “Post-structuralism: The end of theory”The Oxford Literary Review5(1–2) 3–20
51.
YoungR, 1988, “The politics of ‘the politics of literary theory’”The Oxford Literary Review10(1–2) 131–157
