In this paper I seek to clarify the relation between the notions of public space and the public sphere by distinguishing between two dimensions of publicness—contestation and bracketing—in the classical notion of the public sphere as developed by Jürgen Habermas and Hannah Arendt. By clarifying this relation I aim to bring out how public space can be seen as the site of political practices distinct from those usually associated with the public sphere. That in turn will facilitate an understanding of why the idea of public space has been resorted to by activists and scholars to overcome limitations of the public sphere. On the basis of the two dimensions, I propose a distinction between two notions of public space, one centred on contestation and another on bracketing. I argue that both conceptions help articulate political practices that go beyond what is customarily allowed for in the deliberations of the public sphere: On the one hand, practices that visibilize dissent and expose inequalities and, on the other hand, practices that construct alternative arenas where marginal or subordinate people's self-confidence as political actors can be strengthened.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Polity Press, Cambridge)
2.
AndersonN, 1962The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
3.
AppaduraiA, 1996Modernity at Large (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
4.
ArendtH, 1958The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
5.
ArendtH, 2006On Revolution (Penguin, London)
6.
ArièsP, 1962Centuries of Childhood (Vintage, New York)
7.
BanerjeeTLoukaitou-SiderisA, 2013, “Suspicion, surveillance, and safety: A new imperative for public space?”, in Policy, Planning, and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development Eds CarmonNFainsteinS, (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 337–355
8.
BarberB R, 2001, “Malled, mauled, and overhauled: Arresting suburban sprawl by transforming suburban malls into usable civic space”, in Public Space and Democracy Eds HénaffMStrongT B, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 201–220
9.
BarnettC, 2008, “Convening publics: The parasitical spaces of public action”, in The Handbook of Political Geography Ed. CoxK, (Sage, London) pp 403–417
10.
BenhabibS, 1992, “Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition and Jürgen Habermas”, in Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 89–120
11.
BensonR, 2009, “Shaping the public sphere: Habermas and beyond”American Sociologist40175–197
12.
BreeseE Butler, 2011, “Mapping the variety of public spheres”Communication Theory21130–149
13.
CassegårdC, 2013Youth Movements, Trauma and Alternative Space in Contemporary Japan (Brill, Leiden)
14.
CastellsM, 2008, “The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science61678–93
15.
CrossleyN, 2004, “On systematically distorted communication: Bourdieu and the socio-analysis of publics”, in After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere Eds CrossleyNRobertsJ M, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 88–112
16.
DahlbergL, 2003, “The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously?”Theory and Society34111–136
17.
DahlgrenP, 2001, “The public sphere and the net: Structure, space, and communication”, in Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy Eds BennettW LEntmanR M, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 33–55
18.
D'ArcusB, 2004, “Dissent, public space and the politics of citizenship”Space and Polity8355–370
19.
DavisM, 1990City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Verso, London)
20.
DayanD, 2001, “The peculiar public of television”Media, Culture and Society23743–765
21.
de Solà-MoralesI, 1995, “Terrain vague”, in Anyplace Ed. DavidsonC C, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 118–123
22.
DeweyJ, 1954The Public and its Problems (Ohio University Press, Athens, OH)
23.
DoronG, 2007, “… badlands, blank space, border vacuums, brown fields, conceptual Nevada, Dead Zones …”Field: A Free Journal for Architecture110–23
24.
DoronG, 2008, “‘… those marvelous empty zones on the edge of our cities’: Heterotopia and the ‘Dead Zone’”, in Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society Eds DehaeneMDe CauterL, (Routledge, London) pp 203–214
25.
EideEKuneliusR, 2010, “Domesticating global moments”, in Global Climate, Local Journalisms Ed. EideE, (Projektverlag, Bochum) pp 11–40
26.
EmirbayerMShellerM, 1999, “Publics in history”Theory and Society28145–197
27.
EvansSBoyteH, 1992Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
28.
FerreeMGamsonWGerhardsJRuchtD, 2002, “Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies”Theory and Society31289–324
29.
FranckK AStevensQ, (Eds), 2007Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life (Routledge, London)
30.
FraserN, 1992, “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy”, in Habermas and the Public Sphere Ed. CalhounC, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 109–142
31.
FraserN, 2007, “Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world”Theory Culture Society247–30
32.
GamsonW, 1996, “Safe spaces and social movements”Perspectives on Social Problems827–38
33.
GoffmanE, 1963Behavior in Public Places (The Free Press, New York)
34.
GoheenP, 1998, “Public space and the geography of the modern city”Progress in Human Geography22479–496
35.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
36.
HabermasJ, 1996Between Facts and Norms (Polity Press, Cambridge)
37.
HénaffMStrongT B, 2001, “Introduction: The conditions of public space: Vision, speech, and theatricality”, in Public Space and Democracy Eds HénaffMStrongT B, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 1–32
38.
HowellP, 1993, “Public space and the public sphere: Political theory and the historical geography of modernity”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11303–322
39.
JacobsJ, 1992The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Vintage, New York)
40.
KohnM, 2003Radical Space: Building the House of the People (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
41.
KohnM, 2008, “Homo spectator: Public space in the age of the spectacle”Philosophy and Social Criticism34467–486
42.
KohnM, 2013, “Privatization and protest: Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy”Perspectives on Politics1199–110
43.
LatourB, 2005, “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: Or how to make things public”, in Making Things Public Eds LatourBWeibelP, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 4–31
44.
LeeB, 2002, “The subjects of circulation”, in The Postnational Self Eds HedetoftUHjortM, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 233–249
45.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
46.
LoflandL, 1973A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space (Basic Books, New York)
47.
LoflandL, 1998The Public Realm: Exploring the City's Quintessential Social Territory (Aldine de Gruyter, New York)
48.
LowS M, 2000On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX)
49.
MitchellD, 2003The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space (The Guilford Press, New York)
50.
MouffeC, 1999, “Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?”Social Research66745–758
51.
NegtOKlugeA, 1972Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Mein)
52.
OlesenT, 2005, “Transnational publics: New spaces of social movement activism and the problem of global long-sightedness”Current Sociology53419–440
53.
ParkinsonJ, 2012Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
54.
PollettaF, 1999, “‘Free spaces’ in collective action”Theory and Society281–38
55.
RancièreJ, 1992, “Politics, identification, and subjectivization”October6158–64
56.
RancièreJ, 1999Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
57.
RancièreJ, 2004The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible (Continuum, London)
58.
SennettR, 1986The Fall of Public Man (Faber and Faber, London)
59.
ShellerMUrryJ, 2003, “Mobile transformations of ‘public’ and ‘private’ life”Theory, Culture and Society20107–125
60.
SimmelG, 1964, “Sociability: An example of pure, or formal sociology”, in The Sociology of Georg Simmel Ed. WolffK H, (The Free Press, London) pp 40–57
61.
SmithNLowS, 2006, “Introduction: The imperative of public space”, in The Politics of Public Space Eds SmithNLowS, (Routledge, London) pp 1–16
62.
SorkinM, (Ed.), 1992Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space (Hill and Wang, New York)
63.
SparksC, 2001, “The Internet and the global public sphere”, in Mediated Politics Eds BennettW LEntmanR M, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 75–98
64.
SquiresC, 2002, “Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for alternative public spheres”Communication Theory12446–468
65.
StallybrassPWhiteA, 1986The Politics and Poetics of Transgression (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
66.
TaylorC, 2004Modern Social Imaginaries (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
67.
ThörnH, 2007, “Social movements, the media and the emergence of a global public sphere”Current Sociology55896–918
68.
TonkissF, 2005Space, the City and Social Theory (Polity Press, Cambridge)
69.
VillaD, 2001, “Theatricality in the public realm of Hannah Arendt”, in Public Space and Democracy Eds HénaffMStrongT B, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN), pp 144–171
70.
VillaD, 2007, “Arendt, Heidegger, and the tradition”Social Research74983–1002
71.
VolkmerI, 2003, “The global network society and the global public sphere”Development469–16
72.
WaldronJ, 1993, “Homelessness and the issue of freedom”, in Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 309–338
73.
WarnerM, 2002Publics and Counterpublics (Zone Books, New York)
74.
WeintraubJ, 1997, “The theory and politics of the public/private distinction”, in Public and Private in Thought and Practice Eds WeintraubJKumarK, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 1–42
75.
YoungI M, 2011Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
