This paper explores how the human–animal relationship is used to inform the construction of expertise about how best to manage relationships with animals. It pays particular attention to how the material practices of horse training can be understood as performative of human–animal relationships, animality, and the boundary between humans and animals. Drawing on an analysis of commercial videos of natural horsemanship, the paper shows how acts of animal counterperformance are actively used by some trainers to strengthen a performance and, in so doing, enhance the construction of expertise. Setting counterperformance in the context of space, though, the paper also highlights the ongoing ‘risky’ and unstable nature of human–animal relationships and the potential this creates for the performance of expertise in human–animal relations to be challenged.
ArnoldiJ, 2007, “Universities and the public recognition of expertise”Minerva4549–61.
2.
BaradK, 2003, “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28801–831.
3.
BarrettR, 2007101 Horsemanship Exercises: Ideas for Improving Groundwork and Ridden Skills (David and Charles, Cincinnati, OH).
4.
BirkeL, 2007, “‘Learning to speak horse’: The culture of ‘natural horsemanship’”Society and Animals15217–240.
5.
BirkeL, 2008, “Talking about horses: Control and freedom in the world of ‘natural horsemanship’”Society and Animals16107–126.
6.
BirkeLBryldMLykkeN, 2004, “Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships”Feminist Theory5167–183.
7.
ButlerJ, 1988, “Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory”Theatre Journal40519–531.
8.
ButlerJ, 1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, London).
9.
CharlesNDaviesC A, 2011, “My family and other animals: Pets as kin”, in Human and Other Animals: Critical Perspectives Eds CarterBCharlesN (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 69–92.
10.
DespretV, 2004, “The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis”Body and Society10111–134.
11.
EnticottG, 2012, “The local universality of veterinary expertise and the geography of animal disease”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series3775–88.
12.
FoucaultM, 1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Penguin Books, London).
13.
FoxR, 2006, “Animal behaviours, post-human lives: Everyday negotiations of the animal–human divide in pet-keeping”Social and Cultural Geography7525–537.
14.
FurediF, 2009Socialisation as Behaviour Management and the Ascendancy of Expert Authority (Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam).
15.
FutrellR, 1999, “Performative governance: Impression management, teamwork, and conflict containment in city commission proceedings”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography27494–529.
16.
GiddensA, 1990The Consequences of Modernity (Polity Press, Cambridge).
17.
GiddensA, 1994, “Living in a post-traditional society”, in Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order Eds BeckUGiddensALashS (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 56–109.
18.
GoffmanE, 1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Penguin Books, London).
19.
GoffmanE, 1961Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN).
20.
GoffmanE, 1986 [1974] Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA).
21.
GregsonNRoseG, 2000, “Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18433–452.
22.
GreenhoughBRoeE, 2011, “Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: Comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2947–66.
23.
HarawayD, 2008When Species Meet (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
24.
HoweL, 2000, “Risk, ritual and performance”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute663–79.
25.
IrvineL, 2004If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection With Animals (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
26.
KoneckiK T, 2008, “Touching and gesture exchange as an element of emotional bond construction: Application of visual sociology in the research on interaction between humans and animals”Forum: Qualitative Social Research6(3) http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1154.
MacnaghtenP, 2004, “Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and ‘nature’”Sociology38533–551.
29.
MarksK, 2002Perfect Manners: How You Should Behave So Your Horse Does Too (Ebury Press, London).
30.
MarvinG, 2003, “A passionate pursuit: Foxhunting as performance”, in Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance Eds SzerszynskiBHeimWWatertonC (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 46–60.
31.
MieleMEvansA B, 2010, “When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption”Ethics, Place and Environment13171–190.
32.
MillerR M, 2007Natural Horsemanship Explained: From Heart to Hands (The Lyons Press, Guilford, CT).
33.
OrozcoL, 2010, “Never work with children and animals: Risk, mistake and the real in performance”Performance Research1580–85.
34.
PattonP, 2003, “Language, power and the training of horses”, in Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal Ed. WolfeC (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 83–99.
35.
PhiloC, 1995, “Animals, geography, and the city: Notes on inclusions and exclusions”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13655–681.
36.
RashidM, 2004Horses Never Lie: The Heart of Passive Leadership (Skyhorse, New York).
37.
RoseG, 2001, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials (Sage, London).
38.
SchuurmanN, 2012, “‘Hevoset hevosina’: Eläimen ja sen hyvinvoinnin tulkinta [”‘Horses as horses’: Interpreting the animal and its welfare”] (University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu).
39.
SimmonsP, 2003, “Performing safety in faulty environments”, in Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance Eds SzerszynskiBHeimWWatertonC (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 78–93.
40.
SzaryczG S, 2011, “The representation of animal actors: Theorizing performance and performativity in the animal kingdom”, in Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations Eds TaylorNSignalT (Brill, Leiden) pp 149–173.
41.
ThompsonK, 2011, “Theorising rider–horse relations: An ethnographic illustration of the centaur metaphor in the Spanish bullfight”, in Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations Eds TaylorNSignalT (Brill, Leiden) pp 221–253.
42.
WaageE R HBenediktssonK, 2010, “Performing expertise: Landscape, governmentality and conservation planning in Iceland”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning121–22.
43.
WaranN KCaseyR, 2005, “Horse training”, in The Domestic Horse: The Evolution, Development and Management of its Behaviour Eds MillsDMcDonnellS (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 184–195.
44.
WynneB, 1996, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert–lay knowledge divide”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSSzerszynskiBWynneB (Sage, London) pp 44–83.
