This paper examines the recent broadening of the US military’s overseas mission into what it calls ‘full spectrum operations’ and critiques how it is being enabled by what I term ‘full spectrum law’. The paper explores the important doctrinal shifts that took place in the US military from 2005, when it declared for the first time a commitment to ‘stability operations’ as a military responsibility equal in status to offense and deterrence. This, I argue, has reinforced an already dominant US national security discourse in which military and economic security interests are firmly bound. In particular, it has given the US military a broader role in the ‘correction’ of underdevelopment and the securitization of the legal and economic modalities necessary for a functioning neoliberal global economy. The paper reflects on the US military’s blending of security and development concerns and reveals how its legal framing of stability operations draws upon a ‘notional legal spectrum’ that allows for the securitization of the most broadly understood ‘instability’ and sanctions the interminable use of the US military in global interventions in an era ubiquitously cited as one of ‘persistent conflict’.
American Security Project, 2013, “The future of stability operations: lessons from Afghanistan”, panel discussion, American Security Project, Washington, DC
3.
BachmanJ (2010) “ ‘Kick down the door, clean up the mess, and rebuild the house’—the Africa Command and transformation of the US military”. Geopolitics15: 564–585
4.
BellCEvansB (2010) “Post-interventionary societies: an introduction”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding4: 363–370
5.
BenjaminW (1978) Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovichtranslated by E Jephcott
6.
BhungaliaL (2012) “ ‘From the American people’: sketches of the US national security state in Palestine”. Jadaliyya. 18 September, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/7412
7.
BlomleyN (1989) “Text and context: rethinking the law–space nexus”. Progress in Human Geography13: 512–534
8.
Congressional Research Service (2008) Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2006: A Fact Sheet on Department of Defense Authority to Train and Equip Foreign Military Forces, Washington, DC: Library of Congress
9.
DalbyS (2009) Security and Environmental Change, Cambridge: Polity
DillonM (2007) “Governing terror: the state of emergency of biopolitical emergence”. International Political Sociology1: 7–28
12.
DillonMReidJ (2009) The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live, New York: Routledge
13.
DuffieldM (2001) Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merger of Development and Security, London: Zed
14.
DuffieldM (2007) Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples, Cambridge: Polity
15.
EssexJ (2013) Development, Security, and Aid: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics at the U.S. Agency for International Development, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press
16.
Flournoy M, 2013, “Sustaining U.S. global leadership in a time of austerity: a strong, pragmatic and principled approach to U.S. national security”, Walter E Edge Lecture, Princeton University, NJ, 30 April, http://www.princeton.edu/webmedia/lectures
17.
GoJFosterA L (2003) The American Colonial State in the Philippines: Global Perspectives, Durham, NC: Duke University Press
18.
Goodwin S, 2009, “The Department of State: a 3D perspective”, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Washington, DC, 15 July
19.
GregoryD (2010) “War and peace”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series35: 154–186
20.
GregoryD (2011) “The everywhere war”. The Geographical Journal177: 238–250
21.
HarcourtB E (2012) The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
22.
HixsonK (1988) “Extraterritorial jurisdiction under the Third Restatement of Foreign Relations Law of the United States”. Fordham International Law Journal12: 127–152
23.
KaufmanE EBermanH (2010) “Send in the civilians”. Foreign Affairs89(5): 175–176
24.
KennedyD (2006) Of War and Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
25.
Kennedy J F, 1961, “Remarks at Annapolis to the graduating class of the United States Naval Academy”, The American Presidency Project, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=8181
26.
Liddick J, Anderson D A, 2011, “State Department/Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization: inception, challenges, and impact on U.S. reconstruction and stabilization capacity”, Interagency paper no. 4/April, The Col. Arthur D. Simons Center for the Study of Interagency Cooperation, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, KS
27.
Morrison TawJ (2012a) Mission Revolution: The U.S. Military and Stability Operations, New York: Columbia University Press
28.
Morrison Taw J, 2012b, “Economic trade-offs and the military”, Columbia University Press Blog, http://www.cupblog.org/?p=8094
29.
MorrisseyJ (2009) “The geoeconomic pivot of the global war on terror: US Central Command and the war in Iraq”. In: RyanDKielyP (eds) America and Iraq: Policy-making, Intervention and Regional Politics, New York: Routledge, pp. 103–122
30.
MorrisseyJ (2011a) “Closing the neoliberal gap: risk and regulation in the long war of securitization”. Antipode43: 874–900
31.
MorrisseyJ (2011b) “Liberal lawfare and biopolitics: US juridical warfare in the war on terror”. Geopolitics16: 280–305
32.
MorrisseyJDalbySKearnsGToalG (2009) “Geography writes back: responses to Kaplan’s ‘The Revenge of Geography’”. Human Geography2: 33–51
NeocleousM (2008) Critique of Security, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
35.
PalmerM A (1992) Guardians of the Gulf: A History of America’s Expanding Role in the Persian Gulf, 1833–1992, New York: Free Press
36.
Patrick S, 2007, “The U.S. response to precarious states: tentative progress and remaining obstacles”, CGD essay, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC
37.
Patrick S, Brown K, 2007, “The Pentagon and global development: making sense of the DoD’s expanding role”, working paper no. 131, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC
38.
PhillipsP CCorcoranC S (2011) “Harnessing America’s power: a U.S. national security structure for the 21st century”. Joint Force Quarterly63: 38–46
39.
RAND (2008) War by Other Means: Building Complete and Balanced Capabilities for Counterinsurgency, Santa Monica, CA: RAND National Defense Research Institute
40.
RAND (2009) Integrating Civilian Agencies in Stability Operations, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Arroyo Center
41.
RecordJ (1981) The Rapid Deployment Force and U.S. Military Intervention in the Persian Gulf, Washington, DC: Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis
42.
Reid-HenryS (2011) “Spaces of security and development: an alternative mapping of the security–development nexus”. Security Dialogue42: 97–104
ScahillJ (2013) Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, London: Serpent’s Tail
45.
The White House (2005) National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD-44: Management of Interagency Efforts Concerning Reconstruction and Stabilization, Washington, DC: The White House7 December
46.
The White House (2012) National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security, Washington, DC: The White House
US Army and US Marine Corps (2006) Field Manual 3-24/Marine Corps Warfighting Publication 3-33.5: Counterinsurgency, Washington, DC: Department of the Army Headquarters and Marine Corps Combat Development Command Headquarters
49.
US Army Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center (2013) Operational Law Handbook, Charlottesville, VA: International and Operational Law Department, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School
50.
US Central Command (2013) Statement of CENTCOM Commander General James N Mattis before the Senate Armed Services Committee on the Posture of United States Central Command, Washington, DC: Senate Armed Services Committee5 March
51.
US Department of the Army, Washington, DC 2008a Field Manual 3-0: Operations 2008b Field Manual 3-07: Stability Operations 2009, “Full Spectrum Operations”, Army Posture Statement, http://www.army.mil/aps/09/information_papers/full_spectrum_operations.html 2013 Field Manual 1-04: Legal Support to the Operational ArmyUS Department of Defense, Washington, DC 2005 Directive 3000.05: Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations 28 November 2012 Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense 2013 United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Request
52.
US Department of State, 2004, “Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization”, Department of State, Washington, DC, http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/crs
53.
US Department of State (2013) Executive Budget Summary: Function 150 & Other International Programs, Fiscal Year 2014, Washington, DC: Department of State
54.
US Department of State and US Joint Warfighting Center (2005) United States Joint Forces Command J7 Pamphlet Version 1.0: US Government Draft Planning Framework for Reconstruction, Stabilization, and Conflict Transformation, Washington, DC: Department of State1 December
WihartaSMelvinNAvezovX (2012) The New Geopolitics of Peace Operations: Mapping the Emerging Landscape, Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute
60.
WilliamsM (2007) Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security, London: Routledge
