Securing and scaling resilient futures: neoliberalization,infrastructure,and topologies of power

Abstract

In this paper we explore the scaling of resilience policy and practice not as an effect upon infrastructure but as enacted through infrastructure. Drawing on Foucault's topological analyses of governmental power, especially his elaboration of its coeval centripetal and centrifugal flows, we argue that understanding the scaling of resilience policy and practice involves acknowledging its infrastructural composition. We examine this infrastructural scaling through an empirical analysis of UK resilience policy and practice, as recounted by those working across multiple organizations involved in planning for, and coping with, aleatory events. This reveals how the neoliberal decentralizing refrain, expressed in resilience policy and its critique, is both sustained and displaced by interwoven circulatory mechanisms of obstruction, filtration, and acceleration. Together these infrastructural flows amount to ‘fractionally coherent’ scalings that not only centralize governmental power but are constitutive of governmental centres. Our analyses of infrastructural scaling suggest that resiliency policy and practice is far less decentralized, or localized, than others have suggested, with both centripetal and centrifugal flows of power resulting from a composite of infrastructural circulatory mechanisms that can variously scale political agency in relation to aleatory events.

Keywords

resilience scaling infrastructure Foucault topology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Adey

(2011) “Affect and security: exercising emergency in UK civil contingencies”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 1092–1109

Allen

(2011) “Topological twists: power's shifting geographies”. Dialogues in Human Geography 1: 283–298

Allen

Cochrane

(2010) “Assemblages of state power: topological shifts in the organization of government and politics”. Antipode 42: 1071–1089

Amin

(2002) “Spatialities of globalisation”. Environment and Planning A 34: 385–399

Amin

(2013) “Surviving the turbulent future”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 140–156

Bennett

(2005) “The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout”. Public Culture 17: 445–465

Blackburn

(2014) “The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica”. Geoforum 52: 101–112

Brassett

Croft

Vaughan-Williams

(2013) “Introduction: an agenda for resilience research in politics and international relations”. Politics 33: 221–228

Braun

(2014) “A new urban dispositive? Governing life in age of climate change”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 49–64

10.

Bulkeley

(2005) “Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: from national security to local place-making”. Political Geography 24: 875–902

11.

Cabinet Office, HM Government, London 2010 Strategic Framework and Policy Statement, https://update.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/resource-library/strategic-framework-and-policy-statement-improving-resilience-critical-infrastructure 2011 Keeping the Country Running: Natural Hazards and Infrastructure, http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/natural-hazards-infrastructure.pdf 2013a Emergency Response and Recovery: Non statutory guidance accompanying the Civil Contingencies Act 2000, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253488/Emergency_Response_and_Recovery_5th_edition_October_2013.pdf 2013b National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies – 2013 Edition, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-risk-register-for-civil-emergencies-2013-edition

12.

Coaffee

(2013) “Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: from national security to local place-making”. Politics 33: 240–252

13.

Collier

(2009) “Topologies of power Foucault's analysis of political government beyond ‘governmentality’ ”. Theory, Culture and Society 26: 78–108

14.

Davoudi

Shaw

Jamila Haider

Quinlan

A E

Peterson

Wilkinson

Fünfgeld

McEvoy

Porter

Davoudi

(2012) “Resilience: a bridging concept of a dead end?; ‘Reframing’ resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice; Interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in North Afghanistan; Urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice?; Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation?; The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note”. Planning Theory and Practice 13: 299–333

15.

Dean

(2012) “Rethinking neoliberalism”. Journal of Sociology 50: 150–163

16.

DEFRA (2014) Reducing the Threats of Flooding and Coastal Change, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/reducing-the-threats-of-flooding-and-coastal-change

17.

Ettlinger

(2011) “Governmentality as epistemology”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101: 537–560

18.

FEMA, 2011 “National disaster recovery framework strengthening disaster recovery for the nation”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, http://www.fema.gov/pdf/recoveryframework/ndrf.pdf

19.

Foucault

(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press

20.

Foucault

(2003) Society Must Be Defended, London: Penguin

21.

Foucault

(2009) Security, Territory and Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan

22.

Fussey

(2013) “Contested topologies of UK counter-terrorist surveillance: the rise and fall of project champion”. Critical Studies on Terrorism 6: 351–370

23.

Gabrys

(2014) “Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 30–48

24.

Gandy

(2008) “Landscapes of disaster: water, modernity, and urban fragmentation in Mumbai”. Environment and Planning A 40: 108–130

25.

GCC, 2007, “Scrutiny: final report”, Gloucestershire County Council, Gloucester, http://glostext.gloucestershire.gov.uk/Data/County%20Council/20071121/Agenda/Scrutiny%20Inquiry%20into%20the%20Summer%20Emergency%202007.pdf

26.

Graham

(2010a) “When infrastructures fail”. In: Graham

(eds) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, London: Routledge, pp. 1–26

27.

Graham

(2010b) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, London: Routledge

28.

Graham

Thrift

(2007) “Out of order: understanding repair and maintenance”. Theory, Culture and Society 24: 1–25

29.

Grove

(2013) “Adaptation machines and the parasitic politics of life in Jamaican disaster resilience”. Antipode 46: 611–628

30.

Grove

(2014) “Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 240–256

31.

Guldi

(2012) Roads to Power: Britain Invents the Infrastructure State, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

32.

Harvey

Knox

(2012) “The enchantments of infrastructure”. Mobilities 7: 521–536

33.

Heath-Kelley

(2015) “Securing through the failure to secure? The ambiguity of resilience of the bombsite”. Security Dialogue 46: 69–85

34.

Holling

C S

(1973) “Resilience and stability of ecological systems”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23

35.

Holling

C S

(2001) “Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems”. Ecosystems 4: 390–405

36.

House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, 2013 Managing Flood Risk Volume 1, Third Report of Session 2013–14 (The Stationery Office, London) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmenvfru/330/330.pdf

37.

Joseph

(2013) “Resilience in UK and French security strategy: an Anglo-Saxon bias?”. Politics 33: 253–264

38.

Lakoff

Collier

(2010) “Infrastructure and event: the political technology of preparedness”. In: Braun

Whatmore

(eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 243–266

39.

Latour

(1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

40.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press

41.

Law

(2002) Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience, Durham, NC: Duke University Press

42.

Legg

(2009) “Of scales, networks and assemblages: the League of Nations apparatus and the scalar sovereignty of the Government of India”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 34: 234–253

43.

Leitner

Miller

(2007) “Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 32: 116–125

44.

Lentzos

Rose

(2009) “Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection and resilience”. Economy and Society 38: 230–254

45.

Lundborg

Williams

(2011) “Resilience, critical infrastructure, and molecular security: the excess of ‘life’ in biopolitics”. International Political Sociology 5: 367–383

46.

McFarlane

(2008) “Governing the contaminated city: infrastructure and sanitation in colonial and post-colonial Bombay”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32: 415–435

47.

McFarlane

(2010) “Infrastructure, interruption, and inequality: urban life in the Global South”. In: Graham

(eds) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, London: Routledge, pp. 131–144

48.

MacKinnon

(2011) “Reconstructing scale: towards a new scalar politics”. Progress in Human Geography 35: 21–36

49.

Moore

(2008) “Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice”. Progress in Human Geography 32: 203–225

50.

Neocleous

(2013) “Resisting resilience”. Radical Philosophy 178: 2–7

51.

O'Malley

(2010) “Resilient subjects: uncertainty, warfare and liberalism”. Economy and Society 39: 488–509

52.

Perrow

(2011) “The next catastrophe: reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

53.

Pitt

(2007) Lessons from the 2007 Floods: Executive Summary, London: Cabinet Office http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100807034701/http:/archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/pittreview/thepittreview/final_report.html

54.

Raco

Street

(2012) “Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of post-recession development in London and Hong Kong”. Urban Studies 49: 1065–1087

55.

Rogers

(2013) “Rethinking resilience: articulating community and the UK riots”. Politics 32: 322–333

56.

Sparke

(2006) “A neoliberal nexus: economy, security and the biopolitics of citizenship on the border”. Political Geography 25: 151–180

57.

Star

(1999) “The Ethnography of Infrastructure”. American Behavioural Scientist 43: 377–391

58.

Swyngedouw

(2006) “Circulations and Metabolisms: (Hybrid) Natures and (Cyborg) Cities”. Science as Culture 15: 105–121

59.

Wakefield

Braun

(2014) “Governing the resilient city”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 4–11

60.

Walker

Cooper

(2011) “Genealogies of resilience: from systems ecology to the political economy of crises and adaptation”. Security Dialogue 42: 143–160

61.

White

O'Hare

(2014) “From rhetoric to reality: which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 32: 934–950