The US penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, was retrofitted in 2008 to offer the country's first federal Special Management Unit (SMU) program of its kind. This model SMU is designed for federal inmates from around the country identified as the most intractably troublesome, and features double-celling of inmates in tiny spaces, in 23-hour or 24-hour a day lockdown, requiring them to pass through a two-year program of readjustment. These spatial tactics, and the philosophy of punishment underlying them, contrast with the modern reform ideals upon which the prison was designed and built in 1932. The SMU represents the latest punitive phase in American penology, one that neither simply eliminates men as in the premodern spectacle, nor creates the docile, rehabilitated bodies of the modern panopticon; rather, it is a late-modern structure that produces only fear, terror, violence, and death. This SMU represents the latest of the late-modern prisons, similar to other supermax facilities in the US but offering its own unique system of punishment as well. While the prison exists within the system of American law and jurisprudence, it also manifests features of Agamben's lawless, camp-like space that emerges during a state of exception, exempt from outside scrutiny with inmate treatment typically beyond the scope of the law.
AbramskyS, 2002, “Return of the madhouse: Supermax prisons are denying inmates their basic rights”American Prospect13 (3), 26–29
2.
AgambenG, 1998Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life translated by Heller-RoazenD (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
3.
AgambenG, 2005State of Exception translated by AttellK (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
4.
AlfordC F, 2000, “What would it matter if everything Foucault said about prison were wrong? Discipline and Punish after twenty years”Theory and Society29125–146
5.
American Federation of Government Employees, 2011 Council of Prison Locals 33, http://www.cpl33.info
6.
Anon, 1939United States Penitentiary Lewisburg, PA (Federal Prison Industries, Inc. Press, Leavenworth, KS)
7.
BaxterCBrownWChatman-BeyTJohnsonH BMedleyMThompsonDTillettSWoodlandJLederD, 2005 [1993], “Live from the panopticon: Architecture and power revisited”, in The New Abolitionists: (Neo) Slave Narratives and Contemporary Prison Writings Ed. JamesJ (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 207–225
8.
BurawoyM, 2005, “2004 Presidential address, for public sociology”American Sociological Review704–28
9.
CzajkaA, 2005, “Inclusive exclusion: Citizenship and the American prisoner and prison”Studies in Political Economy76111–142
10.
DowkerFGoodG, 1992, “From Alcatraz to Marion to Florence: Control unit prisons in the United States”, in Cages of Steel: The Politics of Imprisonment in the United States Eds ChurchillWWallVander J J (Maisonneuve Press, Washington, DC) pp 131–151
11.
DriverF, 1985, “Power, space, and the body: A critical assessment of Foucault's Discipline and Punish”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space3425–446
12.
EmschwillerJ R, 2011, “Suit claims prisoners are mistreated”The Wall Street Journal 12 December
13.
FinnertyJ, 2011, “Pen tries to curb inmate fights”The Daily Item 24 December
14.
FoucaultM, 1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison translated by SheridanA (Penguin Books, New York)
15.
FoucaultM, 1996, “On Attica”, in Foucault Live: Collected Interviews, 1961–1984 Ed. LotringerS (Semiotext(e), New York) pp 113–121
16.
GaesG G, 1985, “The effects of overcrowding in prison”Crime and Justice695–146
17.
GilmoreR W, 2007Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
18.
GlasmeierAFarriganT, 2007, “The economic impacts of the prison development boom on persistently poor rural places”International Regional Science Review30274–299
19.
GregoryD, 2006, “The black flag: Guantánamo Bay and the space of exception”Geografiska Annaler88B405–427
20.
HallsworthS, 2005, “Modernity and the punitive”, in The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives Eds PrattJBrownDBrownMHallsworthSMorrisonW (Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon) pp 239–255
21.
HallsworthSLeaJ, 2011, “Reconstructing Leviathan: Emerging contours of the security state”Theoretical Criminology15141–157
22.
HaneyC, 2008, “A culture of harm: Taming the dynamics of cruelty in supermax prisons”Criminal Justice and Behavior35956–984
23.
HarcourtB E, 2010, “Neoliberal penality: A brief genealogy”Theoretical Criminality1474–92
24.
HopkinsA, 1930Prisons and Prison Building (Architectural Publishing Co, New York)
25.
JohnstonN, 2000Forms of Constraint: A History of Prison Architecture (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
26.
JonesM, 2010, “‘Impedimenta state’: Anatomies of neoliberal penality”Criminology and Criminal Justice10393–404
27.
KingKSteinerBBreachS R, 2008, “Violence in the supermax: A self-fulfilling prophecy”The Prison Journal88144–168
28.
LappinH G, 2008, “Program Statement: Special Management Units”, Federal Bureau of Prisons, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC
29.
LasanskyD M, 2005, “The architecture of redemption: The federal prison at Lewisburg”, in The History of the Federal Penitentiary at Lewisburg (Lewisburg, Union Country, Pennsylvania) pp 20–91
30.
LevasseurR L, 2005, “Trouble coming every day: ADX—the first year 1996”, in The New Abolitionists: (Neo) Slave Narratives and Contemporary Prison Writings Ed. JamesJ (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 47–55
31.
MartelJ, 2006, “To be, one has to be somewhere”British Journal of Criminology46587–612
32.
MartinL LMitchelsonM L, 2009, “Geographies of detention and imprisonment: Interrogating spatial practices of confinement, discipline, law, and state power”Geography Compass3459–477
33.
MearsD PReisigM D, 2006, “The theory and practice of supermax prisons”Punishment and Society833–57
34.
MincaC, 2005, “The return of the camp”Progress in Human Geography29405–412
35.
MooreM, 2010, “Group: 2 per cell foments prison violence,”The Daily Item 25 September
36.
MooreM, 2011, “Bored teen killer seeks hard time”The Daily Item 5 May
37.
MorrisN, 2000, “Prisons in the USA: Supermax—the bad and the mad”, in Prison Architecture: Policy, Design and Experience Eds FairweatherLMcConvilleS (Architectural Press, Oxford) pp 98–108
38.
MortonG, 2008, “Prison workers say they're at risk”The Daily Item 8 July
39.
NorthJ, 2008, “Come January, penitentiary to house nation's toughest”The Daily Item 9 November
40.
PeckJ, 2003, “Geography and public policy: Mapping the penal state”Progress in Human Geography27222–232
RaymondARaymondS (Dirs.), 1991Doing Time: Life Inside the Big House (Video Verite)
43.
RhodesL A, 2009, “Supermax prisons and the trajectory of exception”Studies in Law, Politics, and Society47193–218
44.
RichardsS C, 2008, “USP Marion: The first federal supermax”The Prison Journal886–22
45.
SpencerD, 2009, “Sex offender as homo sacer”Punishment and Society11219–240
46.
Van HovenBSibleyD, 2008, “‘Just duck’: The role of vision in the production of prison spaces”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space261001–1017
47.
VanyurJ, 1995, “Design meets mission at new federal max facility”Corrections Today5790–97
48.
WacquantL, 2005, “The great penal leap backward: Incarceration in America from Nixon to Clinton”, in The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives Eds PrattJBrownDBrownMHallsworthSMorrisonW (Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon) pp 3–26
49.
WacquantL, 2009Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
50.
WalkerR W, 2010, “Stark life inside a small cage an incentive to improve”Williamsport Sun-Gazette 14 November
