Recent interest amongst critical human geographers in postcolonial theory has been framed by a concern for the relationship between ‘polities’ and ‘theory’. In this paper I address debates in the field of colonial discourse analysis in order to explore the connections between particular conceptions of language and particular models of politics to which oppositional academics consider themselves responsible, The rhetorical representation of empowerment and disempowerment through figures of ‘speech’ and ‘silence’, respectively, is critically examined in order to expose the limits of this representation of power relations. Through a reading of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak's account of the dilemmas of subaltern representation, contrasted to that of Benita Parry, and staged via an account of their different interpretations of the exemplary postcolonial fictions of J M Coetzee, it is argued that the deconstruction of the conventional metaphories of speech and silence calls into view the irreducible textuality of the work of representation. This implies that questions about institutional positionality and academic authority be kept squarely in sight when discussing the problems of representing the struggles and agency of marginalised social groups. It is suggested that the continuing suspicion of literary and cultural theory amongst social scientists for being insufficiently ‘materialist’ and/or ‘political’ may serve to reproduce certain forms of institutionally sanctioned disciplinary authority.
AppiahK A, 1988, “Out of Africa: Topologies of nativism”Yale Journal of Criticism2153–178
3.
AppiahK A, 1991a, “Is the post-in postmodernism the post-in postcolonial?”Critical Inquiry17336–357
4.
AppiahK A, 1991b“Tolerable falsehoods: Agency and the interests of theory”, in Consequences of Theory Eds AracJJohnsonB, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 63–90
5.
AppiahK A, 1992, “Inventing an African practice in philosophy: Epistemological issues”, in The Surreptitious Speech: Présence Africaine and the Politics of Otherness 1947–1987 Ed. MudimbeV Y, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 336–357
6.
AttridgeD, 1992, “Oppressive silence: J.M. Coetzee's Foe and the politics of the canon”, in Decolonizing Tradition: New Views of Twentieth-century “British” Literary Canons Ed. LawrenceK R, (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 212–238
7.
AtwellD, 1993J.M. Coetzee: South Africa and the Politics of Writing (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
BerubéM, 1992Marginal Forces/Cultural Centers: Tolson, Pynchon, and the Politics of the Canon (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
10.
BhabhaH K, 1984, “Representation and the colonial text: A critical exploration of some forms of mimeticism”, in The Theory of Reading Ed. GloversmithF, (Harvester Press, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 93–122
11.
BhabhaH K, 1992, “Freedom's basis in the indeterminate”October6146–57
12.
BluntA, 1994Travel, Gender, and Imperialism: Mary Kingsley and West Africa (Guilford Press, New York)
13.
BluntARoseG, (Eds), 1994Writing Women and Space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies (Guilford Press, New York)
14.
BrennanT, 1994, “Review of Aijaz AhmadIn Theory” Textual Practice8327–335
15.
BrosseauM, 1994, “Geography's literature”Progress in Human Geography18333–353
16.
ChaterjeeP, 1986Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse (Zed Books, London)
17.
CheungK-K, 1993Articulate Silences: Hisaye Yamamoto, Maxine Hong Kingston, Joy Kogawa (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
18.
ChouinardV, 1994, “Reinventing radical geography: Is all that's Left Right?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space122–6
19.
CoetzeeJ M, 1986Foe (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
20.
CoetzeeJ M, 1992Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
CrowleyT, 1996Language in History: Theories and Texts (Routledge, London)
22.
CrushJ, 1995, “Post-colonialism, de-colonization and geography”, in Geography and Empire Eds GodlewskaASmithN, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 333–350
23.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
24.
DerridaJ, 1978Writing and Difference (Routledge, London)
25.
DriverF, 1996, “Histories of the present? The history and philosophy of geography, part III”Progress in Human Geography20100–109
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci Eds HoareQNowell-SmithG, (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
28.
GregoryD, 1995a, “Between the book and the lamp: Imaginative geographies of Egypt, 1849–50”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers2029–57
29.
GregoryD, 1995b, “Imaginative geographies”Progress in Human Geography19447–485
30.
GuhaR, 1982, “On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India”, in Subaltern Studies Ed. GuhaR, (Oxford University Press, Delhi) pp 1–7
31.
GuhaRSpivakG S, (Eds), 1988Selected Subaltern Studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
HallS, 1988, “New ethnicities”, in Black Film, Black Cinema Ed. MercerK, Institute of Contemporary Arts, London, pp 27–31
33.
HallS, 1990, “Cultural identity and diaspora”, in Identity: Community, Culture, Difference Ed. RutherfordJ, (Lawrence and Wishart, London) pp 222–237
34.
HallS, 1996, “When was ‘the post-colonial’? Thinking at the limit”, in The Post-colonial Question Eds ChambersICurtiL, (Routledge, London) pp 242–260
35.
JacksonPJacobsJ M, 1996, “Postcolonialism and the politics of race”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space141–3
36.
JamesonF, 1981The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
37.
JaworskiA, 1993The Power of Silence: Social and Pragmatic Perspectives (Sage, London)
38.
JehlenM, 1993, “History before the fact; or, Captain John Smith's unfinished Symphony”Critical Inquiry19677–693
39.
JohnsonB, 1987A World of Difference (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
40.
JohnsonB, 1995“Muteness envy”, in Human, All Too Human Ed. FussD, (Routledge, London) pp 131–148
41.
KantI, 1970, “On the common saying: ‘this may be true in theory, but it does not apply in practice’”, in Kant's Political Writings Ed. ReissH, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 61–92
42.
KavirajS, 1993, “The politics of nostalgia”Economy and Society22525–543
43.
LazarusN, 1993, “Disavowing decolonization: Fanon, nationalism, and the problematic of representation in current theories of colonial discourse”Research in African Literatures24(4) 69–98
44.
LazarusK, 1994, “National consciousness and the specificity of (post)coloninl intellectuals”, in Colonial Discourse/Postcolonial Theory Eds BarkerFHulmePIversonM, (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 197–220
45.
LoombaA, 1993, “Dead women tell no tales: Issues of female subjectivity, subaltern agency and tradition in colonial and post-colonial writings on widow immolation in India”History Workshop Journal36209–227
46.
LowM M, 1997, “Representation unbound: Globalization and democracy”, in Putting Space in Us Place Ed. CoxK, (Guilford Press, New York) in the press
47.
McClintockA, 1992, “The angel of progress: Pitfalls of the term ‘post-colonialism’”Social Text31/3284–98
48.
MacKenzieJ M, 1993, “Occidentalism: Counterpoint and counter-polemic”Journal of Historical Geography19339–344
49.
ManiL, 1987, “Contentious traditions: The debate on sati in colonial India”Cultural Critique7119–156
50.
ManiL, 1990, “Multiple mediations: Feminist scholarship in the age of multinational reception”Feminist Review3524–41
51.
MillerC L, 1990Theories of Africans: Francophone Literature and Anthropology in Africa (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
52.
NairJ, 1994, “On the question of agency in Indian feminist historiography”Gender and History682–100
53.
O'HanlonR, 1988, “Recovering the subject: Subaltern Studies and histories of resistance in colonial South Asia”Modem Asian Studies22189–224
54.
OrtnerS, 1995, “Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal”Comparative Studies in Society and History37173–193
55.
ParryB, 1987, “Problems in current theories of colonial discourse”Oxford Literary Review927–58
56.
ParryB, 1989, “The hole in the narrative: Coetzee's fiction”Southern African Review of Books April/May, pages 18–20
57.
ParryB, 1991, “J.M. Coetzee: White writing”Research in African Literatures22196–199
58.
ParryB, 1993a, “Review of Aijaz AhmadIn Theory” History Workshop Journal36232–243
59.
ParryB, 1993b, “Speech and silence in the fictions of J.M. Coetzee”New Formations211–20
60.
ParryB, 1994, “Resistance theory/theorising resistance, or two cheers for nativism”, in Colonial Discourse/Postcolonial Theory Eds BarkerFHulmePIversonM, (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 172–196
61.
Public Culture1993, “Controversies: Debating in theory”6(3)
62.
RadcliffeS, 1994, “(Representing) post-colonial women: Authority, difference and feminisms”Area2625–32
63.
RobbinsB, 1988, “The politics of theory”Social Text183–18
64.
RobbinsB, 1992, “Colonial discourse: A paradigm and its discontents”Victorian Studies35209–214
RoseG, 1995, “The interstitial perspective: A review essay of Homi Bhabha's The Location of Culture”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13365–373
67.
RoseJ, 1986Sexuality in the Field of Vision (Verso, London)
SaidE W, 1993Culture and Imperialism (Chatto and Windus, London)
70.
ShiachM, 1993, “‘Cultural studies’ and the work of Pierre Bourdieu”French Cultural Studies4213–223
71.
SharpeJ, 1989, “Figures of colonial resistance”Modern Fiction Studies35137–155
72.
SlemonS, 1991, “Modernism's last post”, in Past the Last Post: Theorizing Post-colonialism and Post-modernism Eds AdamITiffinH, (University of Calgary Press, Alberta) pp 1–12
73.
SlemonS, 1994, “The scramble for post-colonialism”, in De-scribing Empire: Post-colonialism and Textuality Eds TiffinCLawsonA, (Routledge, London) p 15–32
74.
SmithN, 1994, “Geography, empire, and social theory”Progress in Human Geography18491–500
75.
SparkeM, 1994, “White mythologies and anemic geographies: A review”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12105–123
76.
SpivakG C, 1988a, “Can the subaltern speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (Macmillan Press, London) pp 271–313
77.
SpivakG C, 1988bIn Other Words: Essays in Cultural Politics (Methuen, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
78.
SpivakG C, 1989a, “Feminism and deconstruction, again: Negotiating with unacknowledged masculinism”, in Between Feminism and Deconstruction Ed. BrennanT, (Routledge, London) pp 206–223
79.
SpivakG C, 1989b, “A response to ‘The difference within: Feminism and critical theory’”, in The Difference Within: Feminism and Critical Theory Eds MeeseEParkerA, (John Benjamin Publishers, Amsterdam) p 207–220
80.
SpivakG C, 1991, “Coetzee's Foe reading Defoe's Crusoe/Roxana” in Consequences of Theory Eds AracJJohnsonB, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 154–180
SpivakG C, 1993bOutside in the Teaching Machine (Routledge, London)
85.
SpivakG C, 1995, “Supplementing Marxism”, in Whither Marxism? Global Crises in International Perspective Eds MagnusBCullenbergS, (Routledge, London) pp 109–120
86.
TerdimanR, 1985Discourse/Counter-discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-century France (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
87.
VaradharajanA, 1992, “The post-colonial intellectual and the question of otherness”, paper presented at Gender and Colonialism Conference, University College, Galway, 22 May; copy available from the author, Department of English, Queens University, Ontario
88.
ViswanathanG, 1991, “Raymond Williams and British colonialism”Yale Journal of Criticism4(2) 47–66
89.
ViswanathanG, 1996, “Beyond orientalism: Syncretism and the politics of knowledge”Stanford Electronic Humanities Review5(1) [http://shr.stanford.edu:80/shreview]
90.
WattsM J, 1993, “Development I: Power, knowledge, discursive practice”Progress in Human Geography17257–272
91.
WestC, 1987, “Minority discourse and the pitfalls of Canon formation”Yale Journal of Criticism1193–201
92.
WilliamsPChrismanL, 1993, “Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: An introduction”, in Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader Eds WilliamsPChrismanL, (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London) pp 1–20
93.
YoungR, 1988, “The politics of ‘The Politics of Literary Theory’”Oxford Literary Review10131–157
94.
YoungR, 1990White Mythologies: Writing History and the West (Routledge, London)
95.
ZabusC, 1994, “Prospero's progeny curses back: Postcolonial, postmodern, and postpatriarchal rewritings of The Tempest”, in Liminal Postmoderns: The Postmodern, the (Post-) Colonial, and the (Post-) Feminist Eds D'haenTBertensH, (Rodolphi, Amsterdam) pp 115–138
