In this paper the authors develop the concept of difference as it applies to people with disabilities. The production of difference is characterized as necessarily a social and a spatial process which allows the self to be partitioned from the Other. In the aggregate, such processes facilitate the stigmatization of whole classes of people and the institutionalization of rules for boundary maintenance between different groups. One important consequence among the population at large is a ‘hierarchy of acceptance’, that is, a structure of preferential ranking among various disability categories. A metaanalysis of 44 acceptance hierarchy studies since 1968 reveals both stability and change in community preference structures. The largest impetus for change derives from the appearance of new ‘disabilities’ including most especially people with AIDS, and homeless people. Evidence also suggests that significant attitudinal variations occur through space as well as time and when different facility types are considered and that actual behavior may differ from expressed attitudinal preferences. This paper concludes with remarks directed toward a more adequate sociospatial theory of disability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbromsKKoderaT, 1979, “Acceptance hierarchy of handicaps; validation of Kirk's statement, ‘special education often begins where medicine stops’”Journal of Learning Disabilities12(1) 15–20
2.
AhnspachR, 1979, “From stigma to identity politics: Political activism among the physically disabled and former mental patients”Social Science and Medicine A13765–773
3.
AlbrechtGWalkerVLevyJ, 1982, “Social distance from the stigmatized”Social Science and Medicine161319–1327
4.
Aranda-NaranjoB, 1993, “The effect of HIV on the Family”AIDS Patient Care1027–29
5.
AustinD, 1985, “Attitudes toward old age: A hierarchical study”The Gerontologist25431–434
6.
BerrillK T, 1990, “Anti-gay violence and victimization in the United States”Journal of Interpersonal Violence5274–294
7.
BogardusE, 1925, “Measuring social distance”Journal of Applied Sociology9299–308
8.
BowmanJ, 1987, “Attitudes toward disabled persons: Social distance and work competence”Journal of Rehabilitation53(1) 41–44
9.
BrandtA M, 1988, “AIDS in historical perspective: Four lessons from the history of sexually transmitted diseases”American Journal of Public Health78367–371
10.
ButlerJ, 1990, “Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytical discourse”, in Feminism/Postmodernism Ed. NicholsonL (Routledge, New York) pp 324–340
11.
ChliaoutakisJSocratakiFDarviriCGousgounisNTrakasD, 1993, “Knowledge and attitudes about AIDS of residents of Greater Athens”Social Science and Medicine3777–83
12.
ChouinardVGrantA, 1995, “On being not even anywhere near ‘the project’: Ways of putting ourselves in the picture”Antipode27(2) 137–166
13.
ChristmanLSlatenL, 1991, “Attitudes toward people with disabilities and judgments of employment potential”Perceptual and Motor Skils72467–475
14.
DearM J, 1992, “Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome”Journal of the American Planning Association56288–300
15.
DearM JTaylorS M, 1982Not on Our Street; Community Attitudes Towards Mental Health Care (Pion, London)
16.
DearM JWolchJ, 1987Landscapes of Despair: From Deinstitutionalization to Homelessness (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
17.
DearM JWolchJWiltonR, 1994, “The service hub concept of human services planning”Progress in Planning42(3) 173–271
18.
ErinoshoOAyonrindeA, 1978, “A comparative study of opinion and knowledge about mental illness in different societies”Psychiatry41403–410
19.
FeldmanD A, (Ed.), 1990Culture and AIDS (Praeger, New York)
20.
FoucaultM, 1982Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings Ed. GordonC (Pantheon, New York)
21.
FussD, 1989Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference (Routledge, London)
22.
GaberS, 1994“NIMBY's, LULU's, inequitable distribution: How cities deal with controversial facility siting issues”, Department of Community and Regional Planning, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
23.
GethingL, 1986, “International year of disabled persons in Australia: Attitudes and integration”Rehabilitation Literature47(3–4) 66–70
24.
GilmanS, 1985Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and Madness (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
25.
GoodingC, 1994Disabling Laws, Enabling Acts: Disability Rights in Britain and America (Pluto Press, London)
26.
GordonEMinnesPHoldenR, 1990, “The structure of attitudes toward persons with a disability, when specific disability and context are considered”Rehabilitation Psychology35(2) 79–90
27.
GrandSBernierJStrohmerD, 1982, “Attitudes toward disabled persons as a function of social context and specific disability”Rehabilitation Psychology27(3) 165–174
28.
GreenDMcCormickIWalkeyFTaylorA, 1987, “Community attitudes to mental illness in New Zealand twenty-two years on”Social Science and Medicine24417–422
29.
GroszE, 1992, “Bodies—cities”, in Princeton Papers on Architecture. Sexuality and Space Ed. ColominaB (Princeton Architectural Press, New York) pp 241–253
30.
HahnH, 1988, “The politics of physical difference: Disability and discrimination”Journal of Social Issues44(1) 39–47
31.
HahnH, 1991, “Alternative views of empowerment: Social services and civil rights”Journal of Rehabilitation57(4) 17–19
32.
HallE, 1995, “Contested (dis)abled identities in the urban labor market”, paper presented to the 10th Urban Change and Conflict Conference, 5–7 September, University of London, London; copy available from the author, Faculty of Social Science, Open University, Milton Keynes
33.
HarasymiwSHorneMLewisS, 1976, “A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance”Rehabilitation Literature37(4) 98–102
34.
HarawayD, 1991Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Routledge, New York)
35.
HerekG MGluntE K, 1988, “An epidemic of stigma: Public reactions to AIDS”American Psychologist43886–891
36.
HoggettP, 1992, “A place for experience: A psychoanalytic perspective on boundary, identity, and culture”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10345–356
37.
JaquesMLinkowskiDSiekaF, 1970, “Cultural attitudes toward disability: Denmark, Greece, and the United States”International Journal of Social Psychiatry1654–62
38.
JCAMI, 1993, “Mental illness and the media”, special issueJournal of the California Alliance for the Mentally Ill4(1)
39.
KatzSKravetzSKarlnksyM, 1986, “Attitudes of high school students in the United States regarding disability: A replication of an Israeli study”Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin30(2) 102–109
40.
KingSRosenbaumPArmstrongRMilnerR, 1989, “An epidemiological study of children's attitudes toward disability”Development Medicine and Child Neurology31237–245
41.
KristevaJ, 1982Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (Columbia University Press, New York)
42.
LivnehH, 1982, “On the origins of negative attitudes toward people with disabilities”Rehabilitation Literature43(11–12) 338–347
43.
LyonsMHayesR, 1993, “Student perceptions of persons with psychiatric and other disorders”The American Journal of Occupational Therapy47541–548
44.
MacKinnonK, 1992The Politics of Popular Representation: Reagan, Thatcher, AIDS, and the Movies (Associated University Presses, Cranbury, NJ)
45.
MinowM, 1990Making all the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
46.
MuirM S, 1991The Environmental Context of AIDS (Praeger, New York)
47.
NordbyN, 1979, “Acceptance of selected disabilities by university graduate students”, unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
48.
OliverM, 1990The Politics of Disablement (St Martin's Press, New York)
49.
PhiloC, 1987, “The same and other: On geographies, madness, and outsiders”, OP-11, Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough
50.
RichardsonSGoodmanNDornbuschSHastorfA, 1963, “Variant reactions to physical disabilities”American Sociological Review28429–435
51.
RogersDGinzbergE, 1989Public and Professional Attitudes toward AIDS Patients: A National Dilemma (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
52.
RosenbaumPArmstrongRKingS, 1988, “Determinants of children's attitudes toward disability: A review of evidence”Children's Health Care17(1) 32–39
53.
ScheerJGroceN, 1988, “Impairment as a human constant: Cross-cultural and historical perspectives on variation”Journal of Social Issues44(1) 23–37
54.
SchmelkinL, 1984, “Hierarchy of preferences toward disabled groups: A reanalysis”Perceptual and Motor Skills59151–157
55.
SegalSBaumohlJMoylesE, 1980, “Neighbourhood type and community reaction to the mentally ill: A paradox of intensity”Journal of Health and Social Behavior21 (December) 345–359
56.
ShurkaEKatzS, 1982, “Evaluation of persons with a physical disability: The influence of variables related to the disabled on Arab and Jewish Youth”Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology13105–116
57.
SibleyD, 1995Geographies of Exclusion; Society and Difference in the West (Routledge, London)
58.
SigelmanC, 1991, “Social distance from stigmatized groups; false concensus and false uniqueness effects on responding”Rehabilitation Psychology36(3) 139–151
59.
SillerJ, 1988. “Intrapsychic aspects of attitudes toward persons with disabilities” in Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities Ed. YukerH (Springer, New York) pp 58–67
60.
SmithCGiggsJ, (Eds), 1988Location and Stigma; Contemporary Perspectives on Mental Health and Mental Health Care (Unwin Hyman, Winchester, MA)
61.
SmithCHanhamR, 1981, “Any place but here! Mental health facilities as noxious neighbors”Professional Geographer33326–334
62.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies; The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
63.
SolomonP, 1983, “Analyzing opposition to community residential facilities for troubled adolescents”Child Welfare62361–366
64.
SontagS, 1990Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and its Metaphors (Doubleday, New York)
65.
SteinemG, 1994Moving Beyond Words (Simon and Schuster, New York)
66.
StrohmerDGrandSPurcellM, 1984, “Attitudes toward persons with a disability: An examination of demographic factors, social context, and specific disability”Rehabilitation Psychology29(3) 131–145
67.
TakahashiL, 1992National Attitudes Toward Controversial Human Services unpublished PhD Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
68.
TringoJ, 1970, “The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups”The Journal of Special Education4295–306
69.
Waterloo Region Housing Coalition, 1993, “Affordable housing and community attitudes in Waterloo region”, Waterloo, Ontario
70.
WestbrookMLeggeVPennayM, 1993“Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society”Social Science and Medicine36615–623
71.
WilmothGSilverSServeryL, 1987, “Receptivity and planned change: Community attitudes and deinstitutionalization”Journal of Applied Psychology22(1) 138–145
72.
WolchJDearM, 1993Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American City (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)
73.
YoungI M, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
74.
YukerH, 1977, “Attitudes of the general public toward handicapped individuals” an awareness paper prepared for The White House Conference on Handicapped Individuals; copy available from the author
75.
YukerH, (Ed.), 1988Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities (Springer, New York)
76.
YukerHBlockJYoungJ, 1966, “The measurement of attitudes towards disabled persons” study 7, (Human Resources, Albertson, NY)
77.
ZolaI, 1991, “Bringing our bodies and ourselves back in: Reflections on a past, present, and future ‘medical sociology’”Journal of Health and Social Behavior32(1) 1–16
