During the last decade, discussions of geographical scale and its social production have proliferated. Building upon this literature, in particular the writings of Lefebvre and Harvey, I investigate the implications of the contradiction between fixity and motion in the circulation of capital—between capital's necessary dependence on territory or place and its space-annihilating tendencies—for the production of spatial scale under capitalism. I elaborate the notion of a ‘scalar fix’ to theorize the multiscalar configurations of territorial organization within, upon, and through which each round of capital circulation is successively territorialized, deterritorialized, and reterritorialized. These multiscalar configurations of territorial organization position geographical scales within determinate, hierarchical patterns of interdependence and thereby constitute a relatively fixed and immobile geographical infrastructure for each round of capital circulation. Drawing upon Lefebvre's neglected work De l'État, I argue that the scalar structures both of cities and of territorial states have been molded ever more directly by the contradiction between fixity and motion in the circulation of capital since the late 19th century, when a ‘second nature’ of socially produced sociospatial configurations was consolidated on a world scale. On this basis a schematic historical geography of scalar fixes since the late 19th century is elaborated that highlights the key role of the territorial state at once as a form of territorialization for capital and as an institutional mediator of uneven geographical development on differential, overlapping spatial scales. From this perspective, the current round of globalization can be interpreted as a multidimensional process of re-scaling in which both cities and states are being reterritorialized in the conflictual search for ‘glocal’ scalar fixes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1993, “Representing space: Space, scale and culture in social science”, in Place/Culture/Representation Eds DuncanJLeyD (Routledge, London) pp 251–271
2.
AgnewJ, 1994, “The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory”Review of International Political Economy1(1) 53–80
3.
AgnewJ, 1997, “The dramaturgy of horizons: Geographical scale in the ‘reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995”Political Geography1699–121
4.
AgnewJCorbridgeS, 1995Mastering Space (Routledge, New York)
5.
AltvaterE, 1992, “Fordist and post-Fordist international division of labor and monetary regimes”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Routledge, New York) pp 21–45
6.
ArrighiG, 1994The Long Twentieth Century (Verso, London)
7.
BeauregardR, 1995, “Theorizing the global–local connection”, in World Cities in a World-system Eds KnoxPTaylorP J (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 232–248
8.
BourdieuP, 1977Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
9.
BraudelF, 1984The Perspective of the World translated by ReynoldsS (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
10.
BrennerN, 1997a, “State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: Urban and regional planning in the FRG 1960–1990”Political Geography16273–306
11.
BrennerN, 1997b, “Global, fragmented, hierarchical: Henri Lefebvre's geographies of globalization”Public Culture10(1) 137–169
12.
BrennerN, 1997c, “Globalisierung und Reterritorialisierung: Städte, Staaten und räumliche Restrukturierung im heutigen Europa”Welt Trends. Internationale Politik und Vergleichende Studien 17 Winter issue, pages 7–30
13.
BrennerN, 1998, “Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”Review of International Political Economy5(1) 1–37
CernyP, 1995, “Globalization and the changing logic of collective action”International Organization49595–625
17.
ConnollyW, 1991, “Democracy and territoriality”Millennium20463–484
18.
CoxK, 1990, “Territorial structures of the state: Some conceptual issues”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie81251–266
19.
CoxK, 1993, “The local and the global in the new urban politics: A Critical review”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11433–448
20.
CoxK, 1996, “The difference that scale makes”Political Geography15667–670
21.
CoxKJonasA, 1993, “Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128–37
22.
CoxKMairA, 1989, “Levels of abstraction in locality studies”Antipode21121–132
23.
CoxKMairA, 1991, “From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–214
24.
CoxR, 1987Production, Power and World Order (Columbia University Press, New York)
25.
DebarbieuxB, 1996, “Le lieu, fragment et symbole du territoire”Espaces et Sociétés8213–36
26.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political construction of scale”Political Geography1693–97
27.
DunfordM, 1988Capital, the State and Regional Development (Pion, London)
28.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
29.
GottdienerM, 1985The Social Production of Urban Space (University of Texas, Austin, TX)
30.
GottdienerM, 1987, “Space as a force of production”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research11405–416
31.
GoughJEisenschitzA, 1996, “The construction of mainstream local economic initiatives: Mobility, socialization and class relations”Economic Geography72178–195
32.
GourevitchP, 1986Politics in Hard Times (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
33.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
34.
HarveyD, 1985, “The geopolitics of capitalism”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ (Macmillan, London) pp 128–163
35.
HarveyD, 1989aThe Condition of Postmodernity (Blackwell, Oxford)
36.
HarveyD, 1989bThe Urban Experience (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
37.
HeldD, 1995Democracy and the Global Order (Polity Press, Cambridge)
38.
HerodA, 1991, “The production of scale in United States labour relations”Area2382–88
39.
HerodA, 1997, “Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–1989”Political Geography16145–169
40.
JessopB, 1990State Theory (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA)
41.
JessopB, 1994, “Post-Fordism and the state”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 251–279
42.
JonasA, 1994, “The scale politics of spatiality”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–264
43.
KatznelsonI, 1993Marxism and the City (Oxford University Press, New York)
44.
KellyP, 1997, “Globalization, power and the politics of scale in the Philippines”Geoforum28151–171
45.
KingA, 1990Urbanism, Colonialism and the World-economy (Routledge, New York)
46.
KnoxPTaylorP J (Eds), 1995World Cities in a World-system (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
47.
LäppleD, 1973Staat und Allgemeine Produktionsbedingungen. Grundlagen zur Kritik der Infrastrukturtheorien (Verlag für das Studium der Arbeiterbewegung, Berlin)
48.
LashSUrryJ, 1987The End of Organized Capitalism (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
LefebvreH, 1976aDe l‘État: l’État dans le Monde Moderne, Volume 1 (Union Générale d‘Éditions, Paris)
51.
LefebvreH, 1976bDe I‘État: De Hegel à Marx par Staline, Volume 2 (Union Générale d’Éditions, Paris)
52.
LefebvreH, 1976cThe Survival of Capitalism translated by BryantF (St Martin's Press, New York)
53.
LefebvreH, 1977De l‘État: Le Mode de Production Étatique, Volume 3 (Union Générale d’Éditions, Paris)
54.
LefebvreH, 1978De l‘État: Les Contradictions de l’État Moderne, Volume 4 (Union Générale d‘Éditions, Paris)
55.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space published 1974, translated by Nicholson-SmithD (Blackwell, Oxford)
56.
LefebvreH, 1995, “The right to the city”, in Writings on Cities (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 63–184
57.
LeitnerH, 1997, “Reconfiguring the spatiality of power”Political Geography16123–143
58.
LipietzA, 1977Le Capital et son Espace (Maspero, Paris)
59.
LipietzA, 1993, “The local and the global: Regional individuality or interregionalism?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers: New Series188–18
60.
LipietzA, 1994, “The national and the regional: Their autonomy vis-à-vis the capitalist world crisis”, in Transcending the State–Global Divide Eds PalanRGillsB (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO)
61.
MannM, 1993The Sources of Social Power, Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
62.
MardenP, 1977, “Geographies of dissent: Globalization, identity and the nation”Political Geography1637–64
63.
MarxK, 1973Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy translated by NicolausM (Penguin Books, New York)
64.
MasseyD, 1993, “Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place”, in Mapping the Futures Local Cultures–Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (Routledge, London) pp 59–70
65.
MayerM, 1992, “The shifting local political system in European cities”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, New York) pp 255–276
66.
MillerB, 1997, “Political action and the geography of defense investment”Political Geography16171–185
67.
PanitchL, 1994, “Globalization and the State”, in Socialist Register 1994 Eds MilibandRPanitchL (Merlin Press, London) pp 60–93
68.
PeckJTickellA, 1994, “Searching for a new institutional fix” in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 280–315
69.
PeckJTickellA, 1995, “The social regulation of uneven development: ‘regulatory deficit’, England's South East, and the collapse of Thatcherism”Environment and Planning A2715–40
70.
PoulantzasN, 1978State, Power, Socialism (New Left Books, London)
71.
RadiceH, 1984, “The national economy: A Keynesian myth?”Capital and Class22111–140
72.
SassenS, 1991The Global City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
73.
SayerA, 1991, “Beyond the locality debate: Deconstructing geography's dualisms”Environment and Planning A23283–308
74.
ScottA, 1996, “Regional motors of the global economy”Futures28391–411
75.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development (Blackwell, Oxford)
76.
SmithN, 1987, “Dangers of the empirical turn”Antipode1959–68
77.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference and the politics of scale”, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 57–79
78.
SmithN, 1993, “Homeless/global: Scaling places” in Mapping the Futures: Focal Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (Routledge, London) pp 87–119
79.
SmithN, 1995, “Remaking scale: Competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe”, in Competitive European Peripheries Eds EskelinenHSnickarsF (Springer, Berlin) pp 59–74
80.
SmithNKatzC, 1993, “Grounding metaphor: Towards a spatialized politics” in Place and the Politics of Identity Ed. KeithMPileS (Routledge, London) pp 67–83
81.
SmithNWardD, 1987, “The restructuring of geographical scale: Coalescence and fragmentation of the northern core region”Economic Geography63(2) 160–182
82.
SojaP, 1985, “Regions in context: Spatiality, periodicity, and the historical geography of the regional question”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space3175–190
83.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies (Verso, New York)
84.
StaeheliL, 1994, “Empowering political struggle: Spaces and scales of resistance”Political Geography13387–391
85.
SwyngedouwE, 1989, “The heart of the place: The resurrection of locality in an age of hyperspace”Geografiska Annaler B7131–42
86.
SwyngedouwE, 1992a, “The mammon quest: ‘glocalisation’, interspatial competition and the monetary order: The construction of new scales”, in Cities and Regions in the New Europe Eds DunfordMKafkalasG (Belhaven Press, London) pp 39–68
87.
SwyngedouwE, 1992b, “Territorial organization and the space/technology nexus”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers: New Series17417–433
88.
SwyngedouwE, 1996, “Reconstructing citizenship, the re-scaling of the state and the new authoritarianism: Closing the Belgian Mines”Urban Studies331499–1521
89.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalisation’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–166
90.
TaylorP J, 1981, “Geographical scales within the world-economy approachReview5(1) 3–11
91.
TaylorP J, 1982, “A materialist framework for political geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers: New Series715–34
92.
TaylorP J, 1985Political Geography: World-economy, Nation-state and Locality1st edition (Longman, New York)
93.
TaylorP J, 1987, “The paradox of geographical scale in Marx's politicsAntipode19287–306
94.
TaylorP J, 1994, “The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system”Progress in Human Geography18151–162
95.
TaylorP J, 1995, “World cities and territorial states: The rise and fall of their mutuality”, in World Cities in a World-system Eds KnoxPTaylorP J (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 48–62
96.
TaylorP J, 1996, “Embedded statism and the social sciences: Opening up to new spaces”Environment and Planning A281917–1928
97.
TömmelI, 1996, “Internationale Regulation und lokale Modernisierung”Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie4044–58
98.
WallersteinI, 1991, “A call for a debate about the paradigm”, in Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of 19th Century Paradigms (Polity Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 237–256
