In this paper, I explore the ways in which buildings interact with the social fabric of everyday life. My main argument is that agency in the built environment is practised and performed through a dynamic relation between households and the built fabric, among other actants. The paper is based on an ethnographic study of forty-two inner-city households in the Polish city of Gdańsk, combined with archival research. I investigate the forces that constrain and enable the transformation of residential dwellings over time, with the aid of Jacobs's concept of ‘building events’. I wish to provide a more elaborate theorisation and operationalisation of the building event, while applying it to the interrogation of relations between buildings and households in the given context. The paper explores the different modalities through which buildings have been forced to create new allies and associations—allowing for the interpretive flexibility of their technological frame—in order to keep surviving and functioning in different sociopolitical circumstances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ, 2003Lost Geographies of Power (Blackwell, Oxford)
Balcerzak-ParadowskaB, 2005, “Poland's population and demographic changes”, in The Social Report: Poland Eds GolinowskaSGetkaKKierzkowska-TokarskaA (Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Warsaw) pp 55–76
5.
BennettJ, 2005, “The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout”Public Culture17445–465
6.
BijkerW E, 1987, “The social construction of bakelite: toward a theory of invention”, in The Social Construction of Technological Systems Eds BijkerW EHughesT PPinchT J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 159–187
7.
BinghamN, 1996, “Object-ions: from technological determinism towards geographies of relations”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14635–657
8.
BourdieuP, 1989, “Social space and symbolic power”Social Theory714–25
9.
BourdieuP, 1990The Logic of Practice (Polity Press, Cambridge)
10.
BoyerC, 1986Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
11.
BouzarovskiSCzepczynskiM, 2008, “Powerful domesticities: the everyday lives of elderly single women in Ljubljana and Gdańsk”, unpublished paper; copy available from the author
12.
BouzarovskiSGrabkowskaM, 2008, “Flexibility and its others: diverse articulations of residential mobility in two Polish working-class districts”, unpublished paper; copy available from the author
13.
BrownS DCapdevilaR, 1999, “Perpetuum mobile: substance, force and the sociology of translation”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 26–50
14.
BuzarS, 2007Energy Poverty in Eastern Europe: Hidden Geographies of Deprivation (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
15.
CallonM, 1986, “The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle”, in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World Eds CallonMLawJRipA (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 19–34
16.
CallonMLatourB, 1981, “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology Eds Knorr-CetinaKCicourelA V (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 277–303
17.
CsikszentmihalyiMRochberg-HaltonE, 1981The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
18.
de CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
19.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1988A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Athlone Press, London)
20.
DoelM, 2000Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
21.
DoveyK, 1999Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form (Routledge, New York)
22.
EisenmanP, 1992, “Unfolding events”, in Incorporations Eds CraryJKwinterS (Zone Books, New York) pp 423–427
23.
FoucaultM, 1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Allen Lane, London)
24.
FrisbyD, 2001Cityscapes of Modernity: Critical Explorations (Polity Press, Cambridge)
25.
GardinerM, 2000Critiques of Everyday Life (Routledge, London)
26.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration (Polity Press, Cambridge)
27.
GossJ, 1988, “The built environment and social theory: towards an architectural geography”The Professional Geographer40392–403
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
30.
HaynenH, 2001Architecture and Modernity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
HetheringtonK, 1997, “Museum topology and the will to connect”Journal of Material Culture2199–218
32.
HetheringtonKLawJ, 2000, “After networks”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18127–132
33.
HetheringtonKLeeN, 2000, “Social order and the blank figure”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18169–184
34.
HillierWHansonJ, 1984The Social Logic of Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
35.
HinchliffeS, 2000, “Entangled humans: specifying powers and their spatialities”, in Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance Eds SharpJ PRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR (Routledge, London) pp 219–237
36.
ImrieR, 2003, “Architects' conceptions of the human body”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2147–65
37.
JacobsJ M, 2006, “A geography of big things”Cultural Geographies131–27
38.
JacobsJ MSmithS, 2008, “Living room: rematerialising home”Environment and Planning A40515–519
39.
JenkinsL, 2002, “Geography and architecture: 11, rue du Conservatoire and the permeability of buildings”Space and Culture5222–236
40.
JensenO B, 2007, “On the fluid production of meaning and identity: urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Francisco, 17 – 21 April
41.
KaczmarekS, 2001Rewitalizacja Terenów Poprzemysowych. Nowy Wymiar w Rozwoju Miasta (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź)
42.
KalaskaM, 2002Poverty and Welfare Trends in Poland Over the 1990s (UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence)
43.
KerrP, 1995Gridiron (Chatto and Windus, London)
44.
KimA, 2004, “The role of property rights' reforms in Warsaw's housing market”, paper presented at the ‘Winds of Societal Change: Remaking Post-Communist Cities’ conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 18 – 19 June
45.
KingA, 1980Building and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
46.
KingR, 1996Emancipating Space (Guilford Press, New York)
47.
KirschS, 1995, “The incredible shrinking world? Technology and the production of space”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13529–555
LatourB, 1999, “On recalling ANT”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 15–25
55.
LatourB, 2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
56.
LawJ, 1992, “Notes on the theory of the actor network: ordering, strategy, heterogeneity”Systems Practice5379–393
57.
LawJBijkerW E, 1992, “Postscript: technology, stability, and social theory”, in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change Eds BijkerW ELawJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 291–308
58.
LawrenceD LLowS M, 1990, “The built environment and spatial form”Annual Review of Anthropology19453–505
59.
LeesL, 2001, “Towards a critical geography of architecture: the case of an ersatz colosseum”Ecumene851–86
60.
LefebvreH, 2001The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
61.
LeydenK M, 2003, “Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods”American Journal of Public Health931546–1551
62.
LlewellynM, 2003, “Polyvocalism and the public: ‘doing’ a critical historical geography of architecture”Area35264–271
63.
LlewellynM, 2004, “‘Urban village’ or ‘white house’: envisioned spaces, experienced places, and everyday life at Kensal House, London in the 1930s”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22229–249
64.
LorimerH, 2005, “Cultural geography: the busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’”Progress in Human Geography2983–94
65.
MannM, 1993The Sources of Social Power. Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation States, 1760 – 1914 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
66.
MarkusT A, 1993Buildings and Power: Freedom and Control in the Origin of Modern Building Types (Routledge, London)
67.
MayoS KSteinJ I, 1995, “Housing and labour market distortions in Poland: linkages and policy implications”Journal of Housing Economics4153–182
68.
MerrimanPRevillGCresswellTLorimerHMatlessDRoseGWylieJ, 2008, “Landscape, mobility, practice”Social and Cultural Geography9191–212
69.
MichalskiT, 2006The Geographical Aspects of the Transformation Process in Central and East-central Europe (Bernardinum, Gdynia-Pelplin)
70.
MurdochJ, 1998, “The spaces of actor-network theory”Geoforum29357–374
71.
MurdochJ, 2006Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space (Sage, London)
72.
Muzioł-WęcławowiczA, 2000, “Social housing in Polish housing system”, in Social Housing in Europe Ed. LuxM (Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague) pp 22–48
73.
OsborneTRoseN, 1999, “Governing cities: notes on the spatialisation of virtue”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17737–760
74.
OzakiRLewisJ R, 2006, “Boundaries and the meaning of social space: a study of Japanese house plans”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2491–104
75.
PullmanP, 2007His Dark Materials: The Subtle Knife (Scholastic, London)
76.
GdańskaRada Miasta, 2005Studium Uwarunkowańi Kierunków Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Miasta Gdańska (Rada Miasta Gdańska, Gdańsk)
77.
SampJ, 1992Wrzeszcz: ‘Kościół Na Czarnej’ [Wrzeszcz: the church ‘at Czarna’] (Parafia Najświeszego Serca Jezusowego, Gdańsk)
78.
SeigworthG, 2000, “Banality for cultural studies”Cultural Studies14227–268
79.
SerresM, 1995The Natural Contract (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
80.
SharpJ PRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR, 2000, “Entanglements of power: geographies of domination/resistance”, in Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance Eds SharpJ PRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR (Routledge, London) pp 1–42
SmithR G, 2003, “Baudrillard's nonrepresentational theory: burn the signs and journey without maps”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2167–84
SommerR, 1983Social Design: Creating Buildings with People in Mind (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
85.
StankiewiczJSzremerB, 1959Rozwój Urbanistyczny i Architektoniczny Oraz Powstanie Zespołu Gdańsk – Sopot – Gdynia [Urban and architectural development and origins of the Gdańsk – Sopot – Gdynia complex] (Arkady, Warsaw)
86.
ThriftN, 1995, “A hyperactive world”, in Geographies of Global Change Eds JohnstonR JTaylorP JWattsM J (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 18–35
TschumiB, 2000, “Six concepts”, in Architecturally Speaking: Practices of Art, Architecture, and the Everyday Ed. ReadA (Routledge, London) pp 155–176
90.
TschumiB, 2005Event-cities 3: Concept vs. Context vs. Content (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
91.
TuskDDudaWFortunaGNawrockiK, 1996By. Sobie Gdańsk [There Was Once Gdańsk …] (Fundacja Dar Gdańska, Gdańsk)
92.
UchmanRAdamskiJ, 2003, “How to meet the market rules and social goals for housing? Local government and housing in Poland”, in Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning? Ed. LuxM (Open Society Institute, Local Government and Public Reform Initiative, Budapest) pp 118–182
93.
VidlerA, 1994The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Modern Unhomely (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
94.
WeberM, 1968Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Bedminster Press, New York)
95.
WhatmoreS, 2002Hybrid Geographies (Sage, London)
96.
WhiteheadM, 2005, “Between the marvellous and the mundane: everyday life in the socialist city and the politics of the environment”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23273–294
97.
WiseJ M, 2000, “Home: territory and identity”Cultural Studies14295–310
