It is often argued that various forms of illegality persist in the Brazilian Amazon because of weak frontier governance. However, very little is understood about how this governance can be strengthened in the context of social and spatial change in a way that will counter illegality. Drawing on the concept of heterotopias, as discussed by Michel Foucault, and the life history of an illegal logger in an agrarian reform settlement project in the state of Pará, this paper approaches frontier governance by conceptualising the ‘settlement heterotopia’ as a real, lived-in place in which the space that makes up various state and nonstate actors' sites of action interact and continually rearrange power relations. This rearrangement process may or may not work to legitimise illegality and, therefore, strengthening frontier governance involves a process by which collaborative power relations emerge and residents decide to work with the state instead of alongside illegality.
AlstonLLibecapGMuellerB, 1999Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
2.
BarretoPPintoABritoBHayashiS, 2008Quem é o Dono da Amazônia? Uma Análise do Recadastramento de Imóveis Rurais [Who is the owner of the Amazon? An analysis of re-registration of rural properties] (IMAZON, Belém)
3.
BranfordS, 1985Last Frontier: Fighting for Land in the Amazon (Zed Books, London)
4.
BrowderJPedlowskiMWalkerRWynneRSummersPAbadABecerra-CordobaNMil-HomensJ, 2008, “Revisiting theories of frontier expansion in the Brazilian Amazon: A survey of the colonist farming population in Rondônia's post-frontier, 1992–2002”World Development361469–1492
5.
BunkerS, 1985Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
6.
CampariJ, 2005The Economics of Deforestation in the Amazon: Dispelling the Myths (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
7.
CastroE, 2005, “Dinâmica socioeconômica e desmatamento na Amazônia” [Socioeconomic dynamics and deforestation in the Amazon]Novos Cadernos NAEA8(2) 5–39
8.
Centre for the Future State, 2010An Upside Down View of GovernanceInstitute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton
9.
ClearyD, 1993, “After the frontier: Problems with political economy in the modern Brazilian Amazon”Journal of Latin American Studies25331–349
10.
Comissão Pastoral da Terra, 1999Trabalho Escravo no Brasil Contemporâneo [Slavery work in contemporary Brazil] (Edições Loyola, São Paulo)
11.
EmmiM, 1999A Oligárquia do Tocantins e o Domínio dos Castanhais [The oligarchy of Tocantins and domain of “Castanhais”]2nd edition (UFPA-NAEA, Belém)
12.
EmmiMMarinR E A, 1997, “De posseiros a assentados: Precariedade das ações fundiárias no sudeste do Pará” [From posseiros to settlers: Precariousness of agrarian actions in the southeast of Pará], in 10 Anos da Estrada de Ferro Carajás [10 years of the Carajás Railway] Ed. CoelhoM C NCotaR G (UFPA-NAEA, Belém) pp 251–273
13.
EsterciN, 2004, “The peasantry and the church on the Brazilian frontier: The significance of the alliance and its repercussions”, in Some Other Amazonians: Perspectives on Modern Amazonia Eds NugentSHarrisM (Institute for the Study of Americas, London) pp 128–144
14.
FearnsideP, 2005, “Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: History, rates, and consequences”Conservation Biology19680–688
FowerakerJ, 1981The Struggle for Land: A Political Economy of the Pioneer Frontier in Brazil from 1930 to the Present Day (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
17.
GordilloG, 2004Landscapes of Devils: Tensions and Memory in the Argentinean Chaco (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
18.
GordonC, 1991, “Governmental rationality: An introduction”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchellGGordonCMillerP (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 1–51
19.
HaennNCasagrandeG, 2007, “Citizens, experts and anthropologists: Finding paths in environmental policy”Human Organization6699–102
20.
HandelmanD, 2006, “The extended case: Interactional foundations and prospective dimensions”, in The Manchester School Eds EvensT M SHandelmanD (Berghahn Books, New York) pp 94–117
21.
HechtSCockburnA, 1989The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers and Defenders of the Amazon (Verso, New York)
22.
HochstetlerKKeckM, 2007Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
23.
HommaA K O, 2004, “Cemetério dos Castanheiras” [Cemetery of Brazil nuts]Ciência Hoje34(202) 60–63
24.
HommaA K OCarvalhoAmorin RFerreiraPalheta C ANascimentoJ, 2000A Destruição de Recursos Naturais: O Caso da Castanha-do-Pará no Sudeste Paraense [Destruction of natural resources: The case of Brazil nuts in the southeast of Pará] (Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém)
25.
HurrellA, 1991, “The politics of Amazonian deforestation”Journal of Latin American Studies23197–215
26.
HvalkofS, 2006, “Progress of the victims: Political ecology in the Peruvian Amazon”, in Reimagining Political Ecology Eds BiersackAGreenbergJ (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 195–232
27.
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico-Social do Pará (IDESP), 1987Pará Agrario [Agrarian Pará]2 (IDESP, Belém)
28.
JonesJ, 1990Colonization and Environment: Land Settlement Projects in Central America (United Nations University Press, Tokyo)
29.
KapfererB, 2006, “Situations, crisis, and the anthropology of the concrete: The contribution of Max Gluckman”, in The Manchester School Eds EvensT M SHandelmanD (Berghahn Books, New York) pp 118–155
30.
KirbyKLauranceWAlbernetzASchrothGFearnsidePBergenSVenticiniqueECostaC, 2006, “The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon”Futures38432–453
31.
LauranceWCochraneMBergenSFearnsidePDelamônicaPBarberCD'AngeloSFernandesT, 2001, “The future of the Brazilian Amazon”Science291(5503) 438–439
32.
MattosV, 1996História de Marabá (Grafil, Marabá)
33.
MooreD, 2005Suffering for Territory: Race, Place and Power in Zimbabwe (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
34.
MooreS F, 2002 [1978] Law as Process (Peter Lang, Frankfurt)
35.
MorphyHFlintK, 1997, “Introduction”, in Culture, Landscape, and Environment: The Linacre Lectures Eds FlintKMorphyH (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 1–14
36.
NepstadDMcGrathDAlencarABarrosCCarvalhoGSnatilliMDiazVera M del C, 2002, “Frontier governance in Amazonia”Science95(5555) 629–631
37.
NepstadDAzevedo-RamosCLimaEMcGrathDPereiraCMerryF, 2004, “Managing the Amazon timber industry”Conservation Biology18575–577
OtsukiK, 2007Paradise in a Brazil Nut Cemetery: Sustainability Discourses and Social Action in Pará, the Brazilian Amazon PhD dissertation, Wageningen University
40.
OtsukiK, 2009, “The global environment as life-worlds: On the meanings of sustainable development”Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente20103–117
41.
OtsukiK, 2011, “Framing frontier governance through territorial processes in the Brazilian Amazon”Local Environment16115–128
42.
OtsukiK, 2012, “Reflexivity in participatory development: Framing community-based natural resource management on the Amazon frontier”Human Organization71(2) 200–210
43.
de AlmeidaOzório ACampariJ, 1995Sustainable Settlement in the Brazilian Amazon (Oxford University Press, New York)
44.
PachecoP, 2009, “Agrarian reform in the Brazilian Amazon: Its implications for land distribution and deforestation”World Development371337–1347
45.
PendletonM, 2007, “The social basis of illegal logging and forestry law enforcement in North America”, in Illegal Logging: Law Enforcement, Livelihoods and the Timber Trade Ed. TacconiL (Earthscan, London) pp 17–42
46.
PerzSBrilhanteSBrownFCaldasMIkedaSMendozaEOverdevestCReisVReyesFernando JRojasDSchminkMSouzaCWalkerR, 2008, “Road building, land use and climate change: Prospects for environmental governance in the Amazon”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B3631889–1895
47.
RabinowP (Ed.), 1984The Foucault Reader (Pantheon Books, New York)
48.
RafflesH, 2002In Amazonia: A Natural History (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
49.
ReisE, 2001, “Os impactos do pólo siderúrgico de Carajás no desflorestamento da Amazônia Brasileira” [The impacts of iron-making cluster of Carajás on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon]Parcerias Estratégicas12276–293
50.
RodriguesAEwersRParryLSouzaCVeríssimoABalmfordA, 2009, “Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier”Science324(5933) 1435–1437
51.
SchminkMWoodC, 1992Contested Frontiers in Amazonia (Columbia University Press, New York)
52.
SheridanT, 2007, Landscapes of Fraud: Mission Tumacácori, the Baca Float, and the Betrayal of the O'odham (Arizona University Press, Tuscon, AZ)
53.
TollefsonJ, 2008, “Brazil goes to war against logging”Nature452(7193) 134–135
54.
TsingA, 2005Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
55.
VelhoO, 1973Frentes de Expansão e Estrutura Agraria [Frontline of Frontier Expansion and Agrarian Structure] (Editora Vozes, Petropolis)
56.
VenkatesanS, 2009, “Rethinking agency: Persons and things in the heterotopia of ‘traditional Indian craft’”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute1578–95
57.
WatrinOSampaioSVenturieriA, 2001, “Dinâmica da vegetação e do uso da terra no ‘Polígono dos Castanhais’, sudeste paraense, usando geotecnologias” [Land cover and land use dynamics in the ‘Polígono dos Castanhais’, Brazilian Amazonia, using geotechnology]Geografia26(3) 37–54
58.
WattsMPeetR, 2004, “Liberating political ecology”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements2nd edition, Ed. PeetRWattsM (Routledge, London) pp 1–43
59.
YarrowT, 2008, “Life/history: Personal narratives of development amongst NGO workers and activists in Ghana”Africa78334–358
