This paper describes an innovative planning process, the Wind Power Charter of the Regional Natural Park of the Narbonnaise (southern France). By ‘innovative’, we mean that planners' decisions relate to the site/situation which they aim to transform rather than to preexisting norms or abstract territorial representations, as is so often the case in wind power planning processes. This planning process has a direct consequence: it succeeds in taking into account the existing local landscape and in engaging it in a transformative process. Drawing upon Deleuze's and Guattari's concepts of ‘map’/‘tracing’, and on Deleuze's concept of ‘sign’, we follow the way in which landscape is circulated in this process and analyse the relational properties of the graphic representations which underlie it. The analysis relies on a follow-up of the design and consultation work throughout this process. It shows how an iconographic practice can contribute to the composition of an emerging reality (new landscape) without indexing it to preexisting and normative representations of the territory: hence the title of the paper, “Playing with the line, channelling multiplicity”, which connects the materiality of graphic forms with the nonrepresentational—with the multiplicity of the emerging energy landscapes.
AgterboschSReeMeertens MWalterVermeulen J V, 2009, “The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews13393–405
2.
AitkenM, 2010, “Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature”Energy Policy381834–1841
3.
AntonioliM, 2003Géophilosophie de Deleuze et Guattari (L'Harmattan, Paris)
4.
BertinJ, 1967Sémiologie graphique (Mouton, Gauthier-Villars, La Haye, Paris)
5.
BontaM, 2005, “Becoming-forest, becoming-local: Transformations of a protected area in Honduras”Geoforum3695–112
6.
BontaM, 2009, “Taking Deleuze into the field: Machinic ethnography for the social sciences”Deleuze Studies3135–142
7.
BreukersSWolsinkM, 2007, “Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison”Energy Policy352737–2750
8.
BuydensM, 2005Sahara: L'esthétique de Gilles Deleuze (Vrin, Paris); originally published in 1990
9.
CastiE, 2000Reality as Representation: The Semiotics of Cartography and the Generation of Meaning (Bergamo University Press, Edizioni Sestante, Bergamo)
10.
CosgroveDDanielsS (Eds), 1988The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
11.
CowellR, 2010, “Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning—the construction of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales”Land Use Policy27222–232
12.
CrouchDMatlessD, 1996, “Refiguring geography: Parish maps of common ground”, in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series21236–255
13.
De LandaM, 2006A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (Continuum, London)
14.
DeleuzeG, 1994Difference and Repetition (Athlone Press, London)
15.
DeleuzeG, 2005Différence et répétition (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris); originally published in 1968
16.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1980Capitalisme et schizophrénie Mille plateaux (Éditions de Minuit, Paris)
17.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 2004A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia translated by MassumiB (Continuum, London)
18.
DewsburyJ-D, 2000, “Performativity and the event: Enacting a philosophy of difference”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18473–496
19.
DoelM, 1993, “Proverbs for paranoids: Writing geography on hollowed ground”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series18377–394
20.
EdneyM, 1996, “Theory and history of cartography”Imago Mundi48185–191
21.
EllisGBarryJRobinsonC, 2007, “Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management50517–551
22.
EllisGCowellRWarrenCStrachanPSzarkaJ, 2009, “Wind power: Is there a ‘planning problem’? Expanding wind power: A problem of planning, or of perception?”Planning Theory and Practice10521–547
GrossC, 2007, “Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance”Energy Policy352727–2736
HerodA, 2011Scale (Key Ideas in Geography) (Routledge, London)
27.
HetheringtonKLawJ, 2000, “Theme issue: After networks”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18127–255
28.
HooleABerkesF, 2010“Breaking down fences: Recoupling social—ecological systems for biodiversity conservation in Namibia”Geoforum41304–317
29.
LabussièreO, 2011, “Eléments pour une prospective du milieu. L'enjeu du sensible en aménagement”Cahiers de Géographie du Québec54499–515
30.
LabussièreONadaïA, 2011, “Expérimentations cartographiques et devenirs paysagers: La planification éolienne de la Narbonnaise”Espace et Sociétés14671–92
31.
LatourB, 2001L'espoir de Pandore: Pour une version réaliste de l'activité scientifique (La Découverte, Paris)
32.
LatourBWoolgarSSalkJ, 1986Laboratory Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
33.
LorimerH, 2005, “Cultural geography: The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’”Progress in Human Geography2983–94
34.
MeyerN I, 2007, “Learning from wind energy policy in the EU: Lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain”European Environment17347–362
35.
NadaïA, 2007, “‘Planning’, ‘siting’ and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case”Energy Policy352715–2726
36.
NadaïALabussièreO, 2009, “Wind power planning in France (Aveyron): From state regulation to local experimentation”Land Use Policy26744–754
37.
NadaïALabussièreO, 2010, “Birds, turbines and the making of wind power landscape in South France (Aude)”Landscape Research35209–233
38.
NadaïAVan der HorstD, 2010, “Introduction: Landscapes of energies”Landscape Research35143–155
39.
NastHPileS (Eds), 1998Places Through the Body (Routledge, London)
PNRN prefiguration group, 2002, “Narbonnaise Wind Power Development Charter: Proceedings of the meeting of July 11, 2002”, Domaine de Montplaisir, Narbonne (in French), available from the PNRN archives
42.
de l'AudePréfecture, 2005Plan de gestion des paysages de l'Aude vis-à-vis des projets éoliensPréfecture de l'Aude, Narbonne
ReyA, 2000Dictionnaire historique de la langue françaiseVolume 2 (Le Robert, Paris)
45.
RogerA, 1997Court traité du paysage (Gallimard, Paris)
46.
RoseGThriftN, 2000, “Theme issue: Spaces of performance, part 1”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18411–517
47.
RoseMWylieJ, 2006, “Animating landscape”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24475–479
48.
SöderströmO, 2000Des images pour agir: Le visuel en urbanisme (Payot, Lausanne)
49.
ThriftN, 2000, “Afterwords”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18213–255
50.
TokeD, 2005, “Explaining wind power planning outcomes: Some findings from a study in England and Wales”Energy Policy331527–1539
51.
TokeDBreukersSWolsinkM, 2008, “Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences?”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews121129–1147
52.
Van WezemaelJ, 2008, “The contribution of assemblage theory and minor politics for democratic network governance”Planning Theory7165–185
53.
WarrenC RMcFadyenM, 2010, “Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland”Land Use Policy26204–213
