In this paper I examine the paradox of democracy and hypersecurity in one of the most significant urban public spaces in the USA, the National Mall in Washington, DC. I explore the 2002 comprehensive security plan for the National Mall. The security plan has generated heated public debate over how to improve security in a post-September 11 world, and protect highly symbolic space, while also preserving the open character of the USA's most visible and used public spaces. I conclude that so far issues of terrorism and national security have trumped concerns about public access on the National Mall. As a result this could both change the symbolic landscape as well as impede active forms of political protest, marches, and demonstrations. These changes are significant, yet have occurred without genuine public debate and participation in the planning process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshworthG J, 1994, “From history to heritage—from heritage to identity: In search of concepts and models”, inBuilding a New Heritage: Tourism, Culture and Identity in the New Europe Eds AshworthG JLarkhamP J, (Routledge, London) pp 13–30
2.
BarberL, 2002Marching on Washington: The Forging of an American Political Tradition (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
3.
Benton-ShortL, 2006, “Politics, public space and memorials: The brawl on the Mall”Urban Geography27(4) 297–329
4.
BondiL, 1998, “Gender, class, and urban space: Public and private space in contemporary landscapes”Urban Geography19160–185
CienskiJ, 2002, “Washington's ugly new look”National Post 29 June
7.
CoaffeeJ, 2003Terrorism, Risk and the City (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
8.
CoaffeeJ, 2004, “Rings of steel, rings of concrete and rings of confidence: Designing out terrorism in central London pre and post September 11”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28201–211
9.
CraneS, (Ed.), 2000Museums and Memory (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
10.
DanielsSCosgroveD, 1993, “Spectacle and text: Landscape metaphors in cultural geography”, inPlace/Culture/Representation Eds DuncanJLeyD, (Routledge, London) pp 57–77
11.
DavisM, 1990City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Verso, London)
12.
DavisM, 1998Ecologies of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster (Metropolitan Books, New York)
13.
DietschD, 2002, “New bunker mentality will mar Washington”USA Today 29 July, page 13A
14.
DonaldJ, 1992, “Metropolis: The city as text”, inSocial and Cultural Forms of Modernity Eds BobcockRThompsonK, (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 417–461
15.
DuncanJ, 1990The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
16.
DwyerO, 2000, “Interpreting the civil rights movement: Place, memory and conflict”Professional Geographer52660–671
17.
DwyerTHsuS, 2005, “Security measures removed, reviewed”The Washington Post 22 January, Metro section, page B1
18.
FahrentholdDNakamuraD, 2002, “Council attacks D.C. surveillance cameras”The Washington Post 8 November, page B1
19.
FooteK, 1997Shadowed Ground: America's Landscapes of Violence and Tragedy (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX)
20.
ForgeyB, 2001, “A good neighbor's monumentally bad fence”The Washington Post 13 August, page C01
21.
ForgeyB, 2002a, “Washington's tunnel vision for tourists”The Washington Post 18 May
22.
ForgeyB, 2002b, “Public spaces, still under siege”The Washington Post 10 September, page A1
23.
FyfeN, (Ed.) 1998Images of the Street: Planning, Identity, and Control in Public Space (Routledge, London)
24.
FyfeNBannisterJ, 1998, “The eyes upon the street: Closed-circuit television surveillance and the city”, inImages of the Street: Planning, Identity, and Control in Public Space Ed. FyfeN, (Routledge, London) pp 254–267
GlassbergD, 2001Sense of History: The Place of the Past in American Life (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, MA)
27.
GoldJ RRevillG, (Eds), 2000Landscapes of Defense (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
28.
GrahamS, 2002, “Special collection: Reflections on cities, September 11th and the ‘war on terrorism’—one year on”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26589–590
29.
GrahamSAshworthG JTunbridgeJ E, 2000A Geography of Heritage (Arnold, London)
30.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere translated by BurgerTLawrenceF, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
HeffernanM, 1995, “For ever England: The Western Front and the politics of remembrance in Britain”Ecumene3293–324
32.
HsuS, 2002, “Arts panel cools on underground Visitor Center”The Washington Post 17 May, Metro section, page B8
JohnsonN, 1994, “Sculpting heroic histories: Celebrating the centenary of the 1798 rebellion in Ireland”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series1978–93
35.
JohnsonN, 1995, “Cast in stone, monuments, geography, and nationalism”Environment and Planning D: Space and Society1351–65
36.
KingA, 1996Re-presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-century City (New York University Press, New York)
37.
KoskelaH, 2000, “The gaze without eyes: Video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space”Progress in Human Geography24243–265
38.
LeeC, “Digging deep for Capitol visitors”The Washington Post 11 November, page A1
39.
LeesL, 1998, “Urban renaissance and the street: Space of control and contestation”, inImages of the Street: Planning, Identity, and Control in Public Space Ed. FyfeN, (Routledge, London) pp 236–253
40.
LeesL, 2004The Emancipatory City: Paradoxes and Possibilities (Sage, London)
41.
LeibJ, 2002, “Separate times, shared spaces: Arthur Ashe, Monument Avenue and the politics of Richmond, Virginia's symbolic landscape”Cultural Geographies9286–312
MitchellD, 1995, “The end of public space? People's park, definitions of the public, and democracy”Annals of the Association of American Geographers85108–133
49.
MitchellD, 2003The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space (Guilford Press, New York)
50.
MitchellDStaeheliL, 2005, “Permitting protest: Parsing the fine geography of dissent in America”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29796–813
51.
MitchellK, 1997, “Conflicting geographies of democracy and the public sphere in Vancouver, BC”Transactions of Institute of British Geographers, New Series22162–179
52.
MitchellK, 2003, “Monuments, memorials, and the politics of memory”Urban Geography24442–459
53.
NCPC, 2002, “The National Capital Urban Design and Security Plan”, October, National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, DC
2003, “Controversial monument tunnel none of public's business, National Park Service says”, press release, 29 April, courtesy of NCSOM archives
58.
OgbornM, 1993, “Ordering the city: Surveillance, public space and the reform of urban policing in England, 1835–56”Political Geography12505–521
59.
ParsonsJ, 2002, “Statement of John Parsons, Associate Regional Director for Lands, Resources, and Planning, National Capital Region, National Park Service, Department of the Interior, before the Subcommittee on the District of Columbia of the House Committee on Government Reform, regarding electronic surveillance in the nation's capital”, testimony, 22 March
ReelM, 2003, “Washington Monument entry tunnel plan dies”The Washington Post 23 October
62.
SantanaA, 2003, “Experts say the Mall can't be invulnerable”The Washington Post 20 March, page B5
63.
SchmelzkopfJ, 1995, “Urban Community Gardens as Contested Space”Geographical Review85364–381
64.
SchwartzmanP, 2005, “D.C. scenes. No postcard captures”The Washington Post 27 March, page A1
65.
ScottP, 2002, “This vast empire: The iconography of the Mall, 1791–1848”, inThe Mall in Washington, 1791–1991 (2nd edition) Ed. LongstrethR, (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) pp 37–60
66.
ShortJ, 1991Imagined Country (Blackwell, Oxford)
67.
SorkinM, (Ed.) 1992Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space (Hill and Wang, New York)
68.
StaeheliL, 1997, “Citizenship, community and struggle for public space”The Professional Geographer49(1) 28–38
69.
The Washington Post 2002, “Mall eyes”, 4 July, page A22
70.
The Washington Post 2003, “Daniel Patrick Moynihan”, 27 March, page A20
71.
The Washington Post 2004a, “Symbols of fear”, 20 November, page A18
72.
The Washington Post 2004b, “Fortresses of fear”, 4 August, page A18
73.
The Washington Post 2005, “A pall over the Mall”, 4 January, page A14
74.
The Washington Times 2002, “Big brother and the Park Service”, 23 March
75.
WheelerL, 2001, “A subtler approach to security on Mall”The Washington Post 21 December
76.
WheelerL, 2002, “Video surveillance planned on Mall”The Washington Post 22 March, page A01
77.
WhelanY, 2002, “The construction and destruction of a colonial landscape: Commemorating British Monarchs in Dublin before and after independence”Journal of Historical Geography28508–533
78.
WithersC, 1996, “Place, memory, monument: Memorializing the past in contemporary Highland Scotland”Ecumene3325–344
79.
YardleyJ, 2002, “On the Mall, entrenched thinking”The Washington Post 6 May, page C2
80.
ZukinS, 1991Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
81.
ZukinS, 1995The Culture of Cities (Blackwell, Oxford)
