During the 1990s, local and federal urban policymakers, neoliberal politicians, and advocates for the poor came to a broad consensus: the geographic concentration of low-income, minority residents in public housing projects located in the inner city constitutes the fundamental problem facing US cities. Accordingly, to solve the problems allegedly associated with the spatial concentration of poverty, public housing, which concentrates low-income people in the inner city, must be demolished and the residents relocated. In this paper I argue that such federal public housing policies are based on a conceptually inadequate understanding of the role of space and of spatial influences on poverty and on the behavior of poor people. The use of spatial metaphors such as the ‘concentration of poverty’ or the ‘deconcentration of the poor’ disguises the social and political processes behind poverty and helps to provide the justification for simplistic spatial solutions to complex social, economic, and political problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramovitzMWithornA, 1999, “Playing by the rules: Welfare reform and the new authoritarian state”, in Without Justice for All, The New Liberalism and Our Retreat From Racial Equality Ed. ReedAJr (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 151–173
2.
AgnewJ, 1993, “Representing space, scale and culture in social science”, in Place/Culture/Representation Eds DuncanJLeyD (Routledge, New York) pp 251–271
3.
BennettL, 1998, “Do we really wish to live in a communitarian city?: Communitarian thinking and the redevelopment of Chicago's Cabrini-Green public housing complex”Journal of Urban Affairs2099–116
4.
BennettLReedA, 1999, “The new face of urban renewal: The Near North Redevelopment Initiative and the Cabrini-Green Neighborhood”, in Without Justice for All, The New Liberalism and Our Retreat from Racial Equality Ed. ReedAJr (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 175–211
5.
BickfordAMasseyD S, 1991, “Segregation in the second ghetto: Racial and ethnic segregation in American public housing 1977”Social Forces691011–1036
6.
BrandtS, 1999a, “NAACP gambled on public housing-and lost”Minneapolis Star Tribune 25 October, page 1B
7.
BrandtS, 1999b, “Lucy Mae Hollman's moving again”Minneapolis Star Tribune 4 May, page 1A
8.
BrandtSDraperN, 1995, “House the poor, sure: The fight is over where, dispersal plans draw opposition”Minneapolis Star Tribune 5 June, page 1A
9.
CarterW HSchillM HWachterS M, 1998, “Polarisation, public housing and racial minorities in US cities”Urban Studies351889–1911
10.
CisnerosH G, 1996The Transformation of America's Public Housing, A 1996 Status ReportDepartment of Housing and Urban DevelopmentWashington, DC
11.
City of Minneapolis, 2000Minneapolis Near Northside Master PlanCity of Minneapolis Planning Department, Minneapolis, MN
12.
DiazK, 1995, “$100 million coming from HUD, low income units to be dispersed, some projects rebuilt”Minneapolis Star Tribune 14 January, page 1A
13.
DiazK, 1997, “First wave of residents resettles from projects”Minneapolis Star Tribune 24 August, page 10
14.
DiazK, 1999a, “With demolition at a halt, dialogue planned”Minneapolis Star Tribune 10 June, page 1B
15.
DiazK, 1999b, “Once-heralded deal to demolish projects now faces criticism”Minneapolis Star Tribune 15 August, page 1A
16.
FraserN, 1993, “Clintonism, welfare, and the antisocial wage: The emergence of a neoliberal political imaginary”Rethinking Marxism6 (1) 9–23
17.
FurstR, 1996, “Urban policy: Sharing the wealth or cutting ties?”Minneapolis Star Tribune 12 July, page 3B
18.
GalsterGZobelA, 1998, “Will dispersed housing programmes reduce social problems in the US?”Housing Studies13605–622
19.
GansH J, 1997, “Uses and misuses of concepts in American social science research: Variations on Loic Wacquants' theme of ‘Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto’”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21504–507
20.
GoeringJKamelyARichardsonT, 1994The Location and Racial Composition of Public Housing in the United StatesUS Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC
21.
GoetzE G, 1996, “The US war on drugs as urban policy”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20539–550
22.
GoetzE G, 2000, “The politics of poverty deconcentration and housing demolition”Journal of Urban Affairs22157–173
23.
GoetzE G, 2001, “Relocation of residents from North Side public housing”, draft, Hollman report, number 5, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, Minneapolis, MN
24.
HaworthAManziT, 1999, “Managing the ‘underclass’: Interpreting the moral discourse of housing management”Urban Studies36153–165
25.
HendersonS A, 1995, “Tarred with exceptional image: Public housing and popular discourse”American Studies36 (1) 31–52
26.
HirschA R, 1983Making the Second Ghetto, Race and Housing in Chicago, 1940–1960 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA)
27.
HopfenspergerJ, 1992, “Suit alleges segregation in public housing, Minneapolis, US agencies named”Minneapolis Star Tribune 28 July, page 1A
28.
HopfenspergerJ, 1994, “Met Council is new target in public housing dispute”Minneapolis Star Tribune 23 February, page 1B
29.
HughesM A, 1989, “Misspeaking truth to power: A geographical perspective on the ‘underclass’ fallacy”Economic Geography65187–207
30.
JargowskyP, 1997Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
31.
JargowskyP ABaneM J, 1990Neighborhood Poverty: Basic QuestionsMalcolm Wiener Center for Social Policy, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
32.
JencksC, 1992Rethinking Social Policy: Race, Poverty, and the Underclass (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
33.
JohnsonD, 1996, “Nice city's nasty distinction: Murders soar in Minneapolis”New York Times 30 June, page 1
34.
KatzM B, 1986In the Shadow of the Poorhouse, A Social History of Welfare in America (Basic Books, New York)
35.
KatzM B, 1989The Undeserving Poor: From the War on Poverty to the War on Welfare (Pantheon Books, New York)
36.
KusmerK L, 1997, “Ghettos real and imagined: A historical comment on Loic Wacquant's ‘Three Pernicious Premises in the Study of the American Ghetto’”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21706–711
37.
MacDonaldH, 1997, “Comment on Sandra J Newman and Ann B Schnare's And a suitable living environment': The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality”Housing Policy Debate8755–762
38.
MalkisA, 1995Trends in Near-North Minneapolis, 1980–1990The Census Project, Minneapolis, MN
39.
MasseyD SEggersM L, 1990, “The ecology of inequality: Minorities and the concentration of poverty, 1970–1980”American Journal of Sociology951153–1188
40.
MasseyD SKanaiaipuniS, 1993, “Public housing and the concentration of poverty”Social Science Quarterly74 (1) 109–122
41.
MasseyD SGrossA BShibuyaK, 1994, “Migration, segregation, and the geographic concentration of poverty”American Sociological Review59425–445
42.
Minneapolis Star Tribune1994, “Housing, desegregate it, like schools, metrowide”, 5 February, page 14A
43.
Minneapolis Star Tribune1997, “In new effort to battle housing bias, HUD awards $15 million in grants”, 1 October, page 11
44.
NewmanS JSchnareA B, 1997, “And a suitable living environment': The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality”Housing Policy Debate8703–741
45.
OrfieldM, 1998Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability TheBrookings Institution and The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, DC
46.
PeckJ, 2001Work/are States (Guilford Press, New York)
47.
RanghelliL, 1999The Immediate Crisis in Public and Assisted Housing: More than a Million Affordable Homes Are at RiskCenter for Community Change, Washington, DC
48.
SalamaJ J, 1999, “The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE VI projects in Atlanta, Chicago and San Antonio”Housing Policy Debate1895–142
49.
SchillM H, 1993, “Distressed public housing: Where do we go from here?”University of Chicago Law Review60497–554
50.
SchillM HWachterS M, 1995, “The spatial bias of Federal housing law and policy: Concentrated poverty in urban America”University of Pennsylvania Law Review1431285–1342
51.
SuttlesG D, 1968The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
52.
ThompsonT L, 1995, “Dispersed public housing can benefit residents and city”Minneapolis Star Tribune 30 September, page 23A
53.
ThompsonT L, 1996, “Promoting mobility and equal opportunity: Hollman v Cisneros”Journal of Affordable Housing5237–260
54.
TurnerM A, 1998, “Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance”Housing Policy Debate9373–394
55.
VenkateshS A, 2000American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
56.
WacquantL J D, 1993, “Urban outcasts: Stigma and division in the black American ghetto and the French urban periphery”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17366–383
57.
WacquantL J D, 1997, “Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research21341–353
58.
WardD, 1976, “The Victorian slum: An enduring myth?”Annals of the Association of American Geographers66323–336
59.
WardD, 1989, Poverty, Ethnicity and the American City 1840–1925 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
60.
WilsonD, 1996, “Metaphors, growth coalition discourses and Black poverty neighborhoods in a US city”Antipode2872–96
61.
WilsonW J, 1987The Truly Disadvantaged, The Inner City the Underclass, and Public Policy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
62.
WilsonW J, 1991, “Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of public agenda research”American Sociological Review56 (February) 1–14
63.
WilsonW J, 1996When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor (Random House, New York)
64.
ZukinS, 1997, “Cultural strategies of economic development and the hegemony of vision”, in The Urbanization of Injustice Eds MerrifieldASwyngedouwE (New York University Press, New York) pp 223–243
