In this paper I argue that in the now-extensive work on the sociology of consumption there is very little that addresses directly the important issue of disposal. Furthermore, I argue that disposal is not just about questions of waste and rubbish but is implicated more broadly in the ways in which people manage absence within social relations. I develop this argument through a critical engagement with the work of Mary Douglas, Rolland Munro, Michael Thompson, and Robert Hertz. I seek to show that disposal is never final as is implied by the notion of rubbish but involves issues of managing social relations and their representation around themes of movement, transformation, incompleteness, and return. I suggest that rather than see the rubbish bin as the archetypal conduit of disposal within consumer practices the door might be seen as a better example. This has implications for understanding questions of representation, ethics, and the management of social relations within the practices of consuming.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoTHorkheimerM, 1979Dialectic of Enlightenment (New Left Books, London); first published in 1944
2.
BatailleG, 1991The Accursed Sharevolume 1 (Zone Books, New York); first published in 1967
3.
BaudrillardJ, 1996The System of Objects (Verso, London); first published in 1968
4.
BaudrillardJ, 1998The Consumer Society (Sage, London); first published in 1970
5.
BowlbyR, 1985Just Looking (Methuen, New York)
6.
BowlbyR, 2000Carried Away (Faber and Faber, London)
7.
BrownP, 1981The Cult of the Saints (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
8.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–233
9.
ChappellsHShoveE, 1999, “The dustbin: a study of domestic waste, household practices and utility services”International Planning Studies4267–280
10.
ClarkA, 1999Tupperware (Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, DC)
11.
DantT, 2000Material Culture in the Social World (Open University Press, Buckingham)
12.
DebordG, 1977Society of the Spectacle (Black and Red, Detroit, MI); first published in 1967
13.
DerridaJ, 1994Spectres of Marx (Routledge, New York)
14.
DouglasM, 1984Purity and Danger (Ark, London); first published in 1966
15.
DouglasMIsherwoodB, 1980The World of Goods (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
16.
FeatherstoneM, 1991Consumer Culture and Postmodernism (Sage, London)
GirardR, 1977Violence and the Sacred (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
19.
GirardR, 1989The Scapegoat (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
20.
GordonA, 1997Ghostly Matters (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
21.
GregsonN, 1993, “And now its all consumption”Progress in Human Geography19135–141
22.
GregsonN, 1997, “Performance and possession: rethinking the act of purchase in the light of the car boot sale”Journal of Material Culture2241–263
23.
GregsonNCreweLBrooksK, 2002, “Shopping, space, and practice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20597–617
24.
HarbersHMolA-MStollmeyerA, 2002, “Food matters: arguments for an ehtnography of daily care”Theory, Culture and Society19(5/6) 207–226
25.
HaugW, 1986Critique of Commodity Aesthetics (Polity Press, Cambridge); first published in 1971
26.
HawkinsG, 2000, “Plastic bags: living with rubbish”International Journal of Cultural Studies45–23
27.
HebdigeD, 1979Subculture (Routledge, London)
28.
HebdigeD, 1988Hiding in the Light (Routledge, London)
29.
HertzR, 1960, “A contribution to the study of the collective representation of death”, in Death and the Right Hand translated by NeedhamRNeedhamC (Cohen and West, London) pp 27–86; first published in 1907
30.
HetheringtonKLeeN, 2000, “Social order and the blank figure”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18169–184
31.
HubertHMaussM, 1964Sacrifice (Cohen and West, London); first published in 1899
32.
KretschmerA, 2000, “Mortuary rites for inanimate objects: the case of Hari Kuyō”Japanese Journal of Religious Studies27379–404
33.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
34.
LatourB, 2002, “Morality and technology: the end to means”Theory, Culture and Society19(5/6) 247–260
MunroR, 1995, “The disposal of the meal”, in Food Choices Ed. MarshallD (Blackie Academic and Professional, London)
49.
MunroR, 1997, “Ideas of difference: stability, social spaces and the labour of division”, in Ideas of Difference Eds HetheringtonKMunroR (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 3–26
50.
MunroR, 1998, “Disposal of the X gap: the production and consumption of accounting research and practical accounting systems”Advances in Public Interest Accounting7139–159
51.
NavaM, 1992Changing Cultures (Sage, London)
52.
O'BrienM, 1999, “Rubbish power: towards a sociology of the rubbish society”, in Consuming Cultures Eds HearnJRoseneilS (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 262–277
53.
PahlR, 1984Divisions of Labour (Blackwell, Oxford)
54.
SahlinsM, 1972Stone Age Economics (Aldine – Atherton, Chicago, IL)
55.
SerresM, 1991Rome (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
56.
ShieldsR, 1989, “Social spatialisation and the built environment: the West Edmonton Mall”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7147–164
