The aim of this research is to understand how the transformation of the communication technoscape allows for the development of particular patterns in the construction of social bonds. It provides evidence for the development of a ‘connected’ management of relationships, in which the (physically) absent party gains presence through the multiplication of mediated communication gestures on both sides, up to the point where copresent interactions and mediated distant exchanges seem woven into a single, seamless web. After reviewing some of the current social-science research, I rely on empirical studies of the uses of the home telephone, the mobile phone, and mobile text messaging in France to discuss how this particular repertoire of ‘connected’ relationships has gradually crystallized as these technologies have become widespread and as each additional communication resource has been made available to users. I also describe how such a ‘connected’ mode coexists with a previous way of managing ‘mediated’ relationships, in which communication technologies were thought to substitute or compensate for the rarity of face-to-face interactions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerPKellnerH, 1964, “Marriage and the construction of reality”Diogenes461–24
2.
BergerPLuckmannT, 1966The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, New York)
3.
BoltanskiLChiapelloE, 1999Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme [The new spirit of capitalism] (Gallimard, Paris)
4.
BurtR, 1992Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
5.
CalhounC, 1998, “Community without propinquity revisited: communications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere”Sociological Inquiry68373–397
6.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
7.
ClaisseGRoweF, 1993, “Téléphone, communication et sociabilité: des pratiques résidentielles différenciées” [Communication, sociability and the phone: differentiated home-based practices]Sociétés contemporaines14–15163–189
8.
de CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
9.
DegenneAForséM, 1994Les réseaux sociaux: une analyse structurale en sociologie [Social networks] (Armand Colin, Paris)
10.
Di MaggioPHargittaiERussell NeumannW, 2001, “Social implications of the Internet”Annual Review of Sociology27307–336
11.
DourishP, 2001Where the Action is: The Foundation of Embodied Interaction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
12.
FischerC, 1992American Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to1940 (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
13.
FoucaultM, 1995Discipline and Punish: Birth of the Prison (Vintage Books, New York)
14.
GoffmanE, 1969Strategic Interaction (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA)
15.
GoffmanE, 1971Relations in Public (Basic Books, New York)
16.
GreenN, 2001, “Who's watching whom? Monitoring and accountability in mobile relations”, in Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age Eds BrownBGreenNHarperR (Springer, London)
17.
GribaudiM, 1999Espaces, Temporalités, Stratifications: Exercices sur les réseaux sociaux [Spaces, temporalities, stratifications: exercises on social networks] (Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris)
HannerzU, 1990, “Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture”, Theory, Culture and Society7(2–3) 237–251
20.
HopperR, 1992Telephone Conversation (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN)
21.
HutchinsE, 1995Cognition in the Wild (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
22.
HutchbyI, 2001Conversation and Technology from the Telephone to the Internet (Polity Press, Cambridge)
23.
JakobsonR, 1963Essais de linguistique générale tome 1: Les fondations du langage[Essay in general linguistics] (Éditions de Minuit, Paris)
24.
LaurierE, 2001, “Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19485–504
25.
LazegaE, 1992, “Analyse de réseaux d'une organisation collégiale: les avocats d'affaires” [Network analysis of a peer-based organization: business law partners]Revue Française de Sociologie33559–589
26.
LicoppeC, 2001, “Pratiques et trajectoires de la grande distribution dans le commerce alimentaire sur internet: vers un autre modèle de coordination pour le commerce électronique” [Practices and trajectories of the food retail sector getting online: towards a new model of coordination for e-commerce]Revenue Économique52191–212
27.
LicoppeCHeurtinJ-P, 2001, “Managing one's availability to telephone communication through mobile phones: a French case study of the development dynamics of the use of mobile phones”Personal and Ubiquitous Computing599–108
28.
LicoppeCHeurtinJ-P, 2002, “The cellular phone as a tool for managing risk and trust in social bonds: re-locating mobile phone users and re-synchronizing unexpected contexts in cellular phone interactions”, in Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance Eds KatzJAakhusM (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 94–109
29.
LicoppeCSmoredaZ, 2000, “Liens sociaux et régulations domestiques dans l'usage du téléphone” [Social bonds and domestic regulations in the use of the telephone]Réseaux number 103, 119–141
30.
LinN, 2001Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
31.
LingRYttriB, 2002, “Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway”, in Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance Eds KatzJAakhusM (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 139–169
32.
LoitronM, forthcoming, untitled PhD, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris
33.
MercierP-ADe GourmayCSmoredaZ, 2002, “Si loins si proches. Liens et communications à l'épreuve du déménagement” [Evolution of social bonds and communication practices when people move]Réseaux number 115, 123–150
34.
MeyrowitzJ, 1985No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
35.
MillerDSlaterD, 2000The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach (Berg, Oxford)
36.
MolALawJ, 1994, “Regions, networks and fluids: amaemia and social topology”Social Studies of Science24641–671
37.
MorelJ, 2002, “Une ethnographie de la téléphonie mobile dans les lieux publics” [An ethnography of the use of the mobile phone in public spaces]Réseaux number 112–113, 51–77
38.
MorleyD, 2000Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity (Routledge, London)
39.
RelieuM, 2002, “Ouvrir la boîte noire: identification et localisation dans les conversations mobiles” [Opening the blackbox: identification and localisation in mobile conversations]Réseaux number 112–113, 21–47
40.
RifkinJ, 2000The Age of Access (Putnam, New York)
41.
RivièreC, 2000, “Les réseaux de sociabilité téléphonique” [Network analysis of telephone sociability]Revue Française de Sociologie41–44685–717
42.
RivièreC, 2002, “La pratique du mini-message: une double stratégie d'extériorisation et de retrait de l'intimité dans les interactions quotidiennes” [The use of text-messaging: a dual strategy in outgoingness and retreat into one's intimacy, in daily interactions]Réseaux number 112–113, 139–168
43.
SmithMKollockP, 1999Communities in Cyberspace (Routledge, London)
44.
SmoredaZLicoppeC, 2000, “Identités sexuées et statuts interactionnels: de la gestion de la durée des communications téléphoniques” [Gendered identities and interactional status: the management of the duration of telephone calls]Réseaux number 103, 255–276
45.
UrryJ, 2000Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century (Routledge, London)
46.
VelkovskaJ, 2002, “L'intimité anonyme dans les conversations électroniques sur les ‘webchats’” [Anonymous intimacy in electronic conversations on webchats]Sociologie du Travail44 (2) 175–191
47.
WeilenmannALarssonC, 2001, “Local use and sharing of mobile phones”, in Wireless World: Social and Interactional Aspects of the Mobile Age Eds BrownBGreenNHarperR (Springer, London) pp 92–107
48.
WellmanB, 1999Networks in the Global Village (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
