As practices of social coordination and connectivity shift in contemporary urban spaces, in part because of the increasing hybridisations of technologies and infrastructures of communication and transportation, public life is being reconfigured and respatialised. In this paper I argue that models of ‘publicity’ have paid insufficient attention to the ways in which publics are deeply embedded in social and machinic complexes involving the mobilities of people, objects, and information. The first half offers an overview of how the converging technologies of mobility and communication have created new temporalities and spatialities for public participation. In the second half I turn to a theoretical programme for rethinking public connectivity and disconnectivity not in terms of the conventional imagery of networks, but as more fluid and contingent social structures that Harrison White has described in terms of coupling and decoupling. Publics are becoming more ‘mobile’ in two ways: first, there is an increasing tendency to slip between private and public modes of interaction, as a result of the new forms of fluid connectivity enabled by mobile communication technologies; and, second, there are opportunities for new kinds of publics to assemble or gel momentarily (and then just as quickly dissolve) as a result of newly emerging places and arenas for communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAThriftN, 2000The Democratic City (Verso, London)
2.
ArendtH, 1973The Human Condition 8th edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
3.
BarkerP, 2000, “Back from the future”The Independent on Sunday Culture Section, 1 October, page 1
BeckettA, 2000, “The whole world in his hand”The Guardian G2, 2 February, page 2–3
6.
BenhabibS, 1992, “Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition and Jurgen Habermas”, in Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics Ed. BenhabibS (Routledge, New York) pp 89–120
7.
BranscombLKellerJ, 1996Converging Infrastructures: Intelligent Transportation and the National Information Infrastructure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
8.
BrownBGreenNHarperR (Eds), 2002Wireless World (Springer, London)
9.
BullM, 2001, “Soundscapes of the car: a critical ethnography of automobile habitation”, in Car Cultures Ed. MillerD (Berg, New York) pp 185–202
10.
CastellsM, 1996The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
11.
CastellsM, 1997The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume II: The Power of Identity (Blackwell, Oxford)
12.
CastellsM, 1998The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume III: The End of the Millennium (Blackwell, Oxford)
13.
CohenJAratoA, 1992Civil Society and Political Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
DavisM, 1990City of Quartz (Vintage, London)
15.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1983Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia translated by HurleyRSeemMLaneH R (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN); first published in 1972
16.
EmirbayerMShellerM, 1999, “Publics in history”Theory and Society28145–197
17.
FraserN, 1992, “Rethinking the public sphere”, in Habermas and the Public Sphere Ed. CalhounC (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 109–142
18.
GrahamSMarvinS, 1996Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (Routledge, New York)
19.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
20.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere translated by BurgerT (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
HajarMReijndorpA, 2002In Search of New Public Domain (Nai Publishers, Rotterdam)
22.
HetheringtonP, 1999, “Working from home may pull society apart”The Guardian 1 December, page 6
23.
LawJBijkerW, 1992, “Postscript: technology, stability and social theory”, in Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change Eds BijkerWLawJ (MIT Press, London) pp 290–308
24.
LawJHassardJ, 1999Actor Network Theory and After (Blackwell, Oxford)
25.
LicoppeC, 2004, “‘Connected’ presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22135–156
26.
LightJ, 1999, “From city space to cyberspace”, in Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Spaces, Relations Eds CrangMCrangPMayJ (Routledge, New York) pp 109–130
MillerDSlaterD, 2000The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach (Berg, Oxford)
29.
MischeAWhiteH, 1998, “Between conversation and situation: public switching dynamics across network domains”Social Research65695–724
30.
MitchellW, 1999E-topia: Urban Life, Jim, But Not as We Know It (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
31.
MossMTownsendA, 2000, “How telecommunications systems are transforming urban spaces”, in Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies Eds WheelerJAoyamaYWarfB (Routledge, New York) pp 31–41
32.
O'HaraM, 2000, “Finns on the threshold of virtual village”The Guardian Finance, 21 September, page 28
33.
PattonP, 2001, “Car interiors inspired by candid cameras”The New York Times Automobile Section, 20 April, page F1
34.
PutnamR, 2000Bowling Alone (Simon and Shuster, New York)
35.
RomeroS, 2000, “A cell phone surge among world's poor in Haiti”The New York Times Technology, 19 December
36.
RyanM, 1997Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City During the Nineteenth Century (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
37.
ShawW, 2000“Cybertopia”The Independent on Sunday Review 9 July, pages 10–16
UrryJ, 2002“Mobility and proximity”Sociology36255–274
46.
UrryJ, 2003, “Social networks, travel and talk”British Journal of Sociology54(2) 155–175
47.
WellmanB, 2001, “Physical place and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(2) 227–252
48.
WhiteH, 1992Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
49.
WhiteH, 1995, “Where do languages come from? I. Switching between networks II. Times from reflexive talk”, Center for the Social Sciences at Columbia University Pre-print Series, Columbia University, New York
50.
WittelA, 2001, “Towards a network sociality”Theory, Culture and Society1831–50
