This is a study of the link between the house and the city, based on a close reading of three historical statements from Western urban theory by Leone Batisti Alberti, Le Corbusier, and Paul Virilio. Sexualized metaphors of the house as the feminine, private realm and the city as the masculine, public realm proliferate in the modern period. However, rather than conforming to this conventional opposition, these three authors define the city in terms of the house. Their statements provide a curious link across temporal and geographical boundaries, with significant theoretical implications. In all three cases both the feminine figure and themes of loss and death underlie the desire to project the ideal city. In this paper I argue that these themes intertwine in complicated ways to assert urban identification in terms of a masculine desire of total control and mastery by silencing the feminine figure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agrest, 1991Architecture From Without (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
AlbertiL B, 1986 [1485] The Ten Books of Architecture (Dover Publications, New York)
3.
Nalbantoğ;luBaydar G B, 1999, “Migration, memory, architecture”, unpublished paper presented at the conference “Frontiers of memory”, University of East London, London, 17–19 September; copy available from BaydarG
4.
Benevolo, 1988The History of the City (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
5.
BestS, 1993, “Deconstructing space: Anne Graham's Installation for Walla Mulla Park and Jeff Gibson's Screwballs”Transition: Discourse on Architecturenumber 42, 27–41, 66–67
6.
BestS, 1995, “Sexualizing space”, in Sexy Bodies: The Strange Carnalities of Feminism Eds GroszEProbynE (Routledge, New York) pp 181–183
7.
CesarianoC, 1521Di Lucio Vitruvio Pollione de Architectura [Of Lucio Vitruvio Pollione on architecture]Como
8.
ChoayF, 1997The Rule and the Model: On the Theory of Architecture and Urbanism Ed. BrattonD (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
ColominaB (Ed.), 1992Sexuality and Space (Princeton Architectural Press, New York)
10.
ColominaB, 1996, “Battle lines: E.1027”, in The Sex of Architecture Eds AgrestDConwayPWeismanL K (Harry N Abrams, New York) pp 167–182
11.
ConleyV A, 1999, “Virilio and feminism”Theory Culture and Society16 (5 and 6) 201–214 (special issue on Paul Virilio)
Di Giorgio MartiniF, 1482Trattati di Architettura Ingegneria e Arte Militare [Treatise on architecture, engineering, and military arts]; copy available in The Laurentian Library, Piazza San Lorenzo, Florence
14.
DuncanN (Ed.), 1996Body space: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality (Routledge, London)
15.
GandelsonasM, 1998, “The city as the object of architecture”Assemblage37 (December) 129–144
16.
GatesB, 1995The Road Ahead (Viking, New York)
17.
GroszE, 1995Space, Time and Perversion (Routledge, New York)
18.
HaarSReedC, 1996, “Coming home: A postscript on postmodernism”, in Not at Home Ed. ReedC (Thames and Hudson, London) pp 253–273
19.
IrigarayL, 1984An Ethics of Sexual Difference translated by BurkeCGillG C (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
20.
IrigarayL, 1999The Forgetting of Air translated by MaderM B (Athlone Press, London)
21.
IsaacsonW, 1997, “In search of the real Bill Gates”Time149 (2) 32–41
22.
LacanJ, 1977The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis translated by SheridanA (W W Norton, London)
23.
LavinS, 1996, “Colomina's web: Reply to Beatriz Colomina”, in The Sex of Architecture Eds AgrestDConwayPWeismanL K (Harry N Abrams, New York) pp 183–190
24.
Le Corbusier, 1947When the Cathedrals were White translated by HyslopF E (Routledge, London)
25.
Le Corbusier, 1967The Radiant City: Elements of a Doctrine of Urbanism to be Used as a Basis of our Machine-age Civilization translated by KnightPLevieuxEColtmanD (Faber and Faber, London)
26.
Le Corbusier, 1986 [1923] Towards a New Architecture translated by EtchellsF (Dover, New York)
27.
Le Corbusier, 1987 [1924] The City of Tomorrow (Architectural Press, London)
28.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space translated by Nicholson-SmithD (Blackwell, Oxford)
29.
LozanovskaM, 1997, “Abjection and architecture: The migrant house in multicultural Australia”, in Postcolonial Space(s) Eds Nalbantoğ;luG BWongC T (Princeton Architectural Press, New York) pp 101–130
30.
LozanovskaM, 1999, “Abreast of the other: Circular methodologies between archeology, architecture and war”, conference proceedings “Sites of recovery: Architecture's [inter]disciplinary role”, Beirut, 25–28 October, pages 235–242; copy available from G Baydar
31.
MulveyL, 1989Visual and Other Pleasures (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN)
32.
NastH JPileS (Eds), 1998Places Through the Body (Routledge, New York)
33.
NastH JWilsonM O, 1994, “Lawful transgressions: This is the house that Jackie Built …”Assemblage24 (August) 49–55
34.
ReedC (Ed.), 1996Not at Home: The Suppression of Domesticity in Modern Art and Architecture (Thames and Hudson, London)
35.
RosserP, 1994, “There's no place like home”, in New Feminist Criticism Eds FruehJLangerC LRavenA (Harper Collins, London) pp 60–79
36.
SaleclR, 1998(Per)versions of Love and Hate (Verso, London)
37.
SennettR, 1994Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilization (W W Norton, New York)
38.
SherifL, 1999, “The multi-faceted realities of recovery in Cairo”, conference proceedings, “Sites of recovery: Architecture's [inter]disciplinary role”, Beirut, 25–28 October, pages 359–363; copy available from G Baydar
39.
SilvermanK, 2000World Spectators (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
40.
SpivakG C, 1988In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (Routledge, New York)
41.
VidlerA, 1996, “Homes for cyborgs”, in Not at Home: The Suppression of Domesticity in Modern Art and Architecture Ed. ReedC (Thames and Hudson, London) pp 161–178
42.
VirilioP, 1991The Lost Dimension (Seminotext(e), New York)
43.
Vitruvius, 1960The Ten Books on Architecture translated by MorganM H (Dover, New York) first published in 1914
44.
WhitfordM, 1991Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the Feminine (Routledge, London)
45.
WigleyM, 1992Sexuality and Space (Princeton Architectural Press, New York)
46.
WilsonM O, 1998, “Dancing in the dark: The inscription of blackness in Le Corbusier's radiant city”, in Places Through the Body Eds NastH JPileS (Routledge, New York) pp 133–152
47.
ZionA S, 1998, “New modern: Architecture in the age of digital technology”Assemblage35 (April) 63–79
48.
ZizekS, 1989The Sublime Object of Ideology (Verso, London)
49.
ZizekS, 1999The Plague of Fantasies (Verso, London)
50.
ZizekS, 2000a, “Class struggle of postmodernism? Yes, please!”, in Contingency Hegemony Universality Eds ButlerJLaclauEZizakS (Verso, London) pp 90–135
51.
ZizekS, 2000b, “Da capo senza fine”, in Contingency Hegemony Universality Eds ButlerJLaclauEZizekS (Verso, London) pp 213–262
