The sensory turn has made a pronounced attempt to broaden the focus in social and cultural geography to encompass the entire sensory spectrum, with the aim of counterbalancing what is perceived to have been the disproportionate attention granted to visual geographies and the act of seeing. In respect of critically understanding the geographies of difference that characterise Deaf citizens' experience in the contemporary city, this paper calls for a moment in geography to take stock of the signature that visual awareness bears in the social life of the Deaf city, and also to consider the hearingness implicit in geographical commentary on the role of sound in the reproduction of place. Reading urban and public spaces from a Deaf-centred perspective, I draw on parallel discussions from social geography and Deaf Studies to critically deconstruct the phenomena underpinning the aural bias that is deeply embedded in the social fabric, and which finds continuous expression in the intangible aural architectures of modern life. Dispositions and attitudes towards the ‘normal’ hearing body and towards hearing ontological engagements with sound and speech serve to maintain the city's audist and phonocentric inclinations. Here, the manner in which the right to the Deaf-friendly city is jeopardised is made explicit through empirical accounts from Deaf people in Ireland and England whose everyday geographies are characterised by the negotiation of urban spaces that were designed according to the needs of an assumed homogenous hearing public.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Polity Press, Cambridge)
2.
AnderssonJVanderbeckR MValentineGWardKSadgroveJ, 2011, “New York encounters: Religion, sexuality, and the city”Environment and Planning A43618–633
3.
AtkinsonR, 2007, “Ecology of sound: The sonic order of urban space”Urban Studies441905–1917
4.
BahanB, 2008, “Upon the formation of a visual variety of the human race”, in Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking Ed. BaumanH D L (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 83–99
5.
Baker-ShenkCKyleJ G, 1990, “Research with deaf people: Issues and conflicts”Disability, Handicap and Society565–75
6.
BatterburyS C ELaddPGulliverM, 2007, “Sign Language Peoples as indigenous minorities: Implications for research and policy”Environment and Planning A392899–2915
7.
BaumanH D L, 2004, “Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression”Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education9239–246
8.
BaumanH D L, 2008, “Introduction: Listening to Deaf studies”, in Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking, Ed. BaumanH D L (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 1–32
BellDValentineG, 1995, “The sexed self: Strategies of performance, sites of resistance” in Mapping the Subject: Geographies of Cultural Transformation Ed. PileSThriftN (Routledge, London) pp 143–157
11.
BlesserBSalterL R, 2007Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
12.
BransonJMillerD, 2002Damned for Their Difference: The Cultural Construction of Deaf People as Disabled (Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC)
13.
ConamaJGrehanC, 2002, “Is there poverty in the Deaf community?”, Irish Deaf Society, Dublin
14.
ConroyP, 2006, “Signing in and signing out: The education and employment experiences of Deaf adults in Ireland—a study of inequality and Deaf people in Ireland”, Irish Deaf Society, Dublin
15.
CraryJ, 2001Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle and Modern Culture (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
16.
DavisL J, 1995Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body (Verso, London)
17.
EmeryS D, 2009, “In space no one can see you waving your hands: Making citizenship meaningful to Deaf worlds”Citizenship Studies1331–44
18.
ErlmannV, 2004, “But what of the ethnographic ear? Anthropology, sound and the senses”, in Hearing Cultures: Essays on Sound, Listening and Modernity Ed. ErlmannV (Berg, Oxford) pp 1–20
19.
EvansA DFalkW W, 1986Learning to be Deaf (Mouton de Gruyter, New York)
20.
GulliverM, 2008, “Places of silence”, in Making Sense of Place Eds VanclayFHigginsMBlackshawA (National Museum of Australia Press, Canberra) pp 87–93
21.
HarrisRHolmesH MMertensD, 2009, “Research Ethics in Sign Language Communities”Sign Language Studies9104–131
22.
HaualandH, 2008, “Sound and belonging: What is a community?”, in Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking Ed. BaumanH D L (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 111–127
23.
HigginsP CNashJ E, 1987Understanding Deafness Socially (Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL)
24.
HooksB, 1992, “Marginality as site of resistance”, in Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures Eds FergusonRGeverMMinh-HaT TWestC (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 341–343
25.
ImrieR, 2003, “Architects' conceptions of the human body”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2147–65
26.
KnoxPPinchS, 2006Urban Social Geography: An Introduction (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex)
27.
LaddP, 2002, “Ethics and politics of deafhood research design and practice”, unpublished paper, copies may be requested from Dr Paddy Ladd, University of Bristol, Bristol
28.
LaddP, 2003Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood (Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Somerset)
29.
LaddP, 2005, “Deafhood: A concept stressing possibilities, not deficits”Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 3312–17
30.
LefèbvreH, 1996Writings on Cities translated and edited by KofmanELebasE (Blackwell, Oxford)
31.
McCannE, 2002, “Space, citizenship, and the right to the city”Geojournal5877–79
32.
MathewsPFoley-CaveS M, 2004, “Village life: Deaf culture in contemporary Ireland”, in Deaf Studies in Ireland: An Introduction Ed. McDonnellP (Douglas McLean, Coleford, Glos) pp 65–84
33.
MayS, 2001Language and Minority Rights: Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
34.
MitchellW J, 1995City of Bits: Space, Place and the Infobahn (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
35.
MurrayJ J, 2008, “Coequality and transnational studies: Understanding Deaf lives”, in Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking Ed. BaumanH D L (University of Minnesota Press, MN) pp 100–110
36.
ObasiC, 2008, “Seeing the Deaf in ‘deafness’”Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13455–465
37.
PocockD, 1989, “Sound and the geographer”Geography74193–200
38.
PurcellM, 2002, “Excavating Lefèbvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant”Geojournal5899–108
RodawayP, 1994Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place (Routledge, London)
42.
SearlsJ M, 2008, “Examining the hearing line” (book review)Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education14403
43.
SenghasR JMonaghanL, 2002, “Signs of their times: Deaf communities and the culture of language”Annual Review of Anthropology3169–97
44.
SennettR, 1994Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western Civilisation (W W Norton, London)
45.
SimpsonP, 2009, “‘Falling on deaf ears’: A postphenomenology of sonorous presence”Environment and Planning A412556–2575
46.
SkeltonTValentineG, 2003, “‘It feels like being Deaf is normal’: An exploration into the complexities of defining D/deafness and young D/deaf people's identities”The Canadian Geographer47451–466
47.
SmithS J, 2000, “Performing the (sound)world”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18615–637
48.
StremlauT M, 2003, “Language policy, culture and disability: ASL and English”Rhetoric Review22184–190
49.
TonkissF, 2003, “Aural postcards: Sound, memory and the city”, in The Auditory Culture Reader Eds BullMBackL (Berg, Oxford) pp 303–309
50.
ValentineG, 2001Social Geographies: Space and Society (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex)
51.
WrigleyO, 1996The Politics of Deafness (Gallaudet University Press, Washington DC)
52.
YoungA MAckermanJKyleJ G, 2000, “On creating a workable signing environment: Deaf and hearing perspectives”Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education5186–195
