In this paper I suggest fleshing out and making material the authorial voice by exploring pathways for writing a critical biography of Claude Raffestin, a Swiss geographer writing since the late 1970s up to the present day. In exploring his life and contribution as part of the wider Francophone tradition of social and political geography, I aim to engage further with the debate on the circulation of knowledge and the alleged hegemony of the English language within geography. In doing this, I suggest that the term ‘disciplinary Orientalism’ might help to think through some of the contradictions in geography, which both draws heavily from foreign critical thinkers, often removed from the spaces and contexts of debate they are/were writing in, and simultaneously ignores foreign geographical traditions and contributions. Building on Raffestin's work—and drawing from diverse sources, including his writings, reviews of his work, and new interview material—I explore how his geographies might make sense here and now, to the extent that ‘here’ is inevitably an uncertain place, not only in where this paper is written and read but also because reading always takes place in-between contexts. Through this example I explore how scholars are embodied and located in uncertain places and points to the multiple circulations and noncirculations of theory and praxis within geography.
AalbersM BRossiR, 2006, “Beyond the Anglo-American hegemony in human geography: A European perspective”Geojournal67137–147.
2.
AgnewJ, 2007, “Know-where: Geographies of knowledge of world politics”International Political Sociology1138–148.
3.
BelinaB, 2005, “Anglophones: If you want us to understand you, you will have to speak understandably! A humble proposition concerning paper presentations by native English speakers at international conferences”Antipode37853–855.
4.
BesseJ-M, 2004, “Le postmodernisme et la géographie: éléments pour un débat”l'Espace Géographique11–5.
5.
BestU, 2009, “The invented periphery: Constructing Europe in debates about ‘Anglo hegemony’ in geography”Social Geography483–91.
6.
BonnetA, 2003, “Geography as the world discipline: Connecting popular and academic geographical imaginations”Area3555–63.
7.
BoyleM, 2005, “Biographical approaches in the teaching of the history and philosophy of human geography: Introduction to review essays on Key Thinkers on Space and Place”Environment and Planning A37161–187.
8.
BressoM, 2009Il Profilo del Tartufo (Rizzoli, Rome).
9.
ChivallonC, 2003, “Country reports: A vision of social and cultural geography in France”Social and Cultural Geography43401–408.
10.
ClavalP, 1976Éléments de Géographie Économique (Éditions M. Th. Génin, Paris).
11.
CalvalP, 1998Histoire de la Géographie Française: De 1870 à nos Jours (Nathan, Paris).
12.
ClavalPStaszakJ-F, 2004, “Confronting geographic complexity: Contributions from some Latin countries: Presentation”GeoJournal60319–320.
13.
CloutH, 2005, “Cross-channel geographers: A century of activity”Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography article 330, http://cybergeo.revues.org/2966.
14.
CollignonB, 2004, “It's a long way to the other geographers and geographic knowledges”GeoJournal60375–379.
15.
CussetF, 2003French Theory: Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze et Cie et les Mutations de la Vie Intellectuelle aux États-Unis (La Découverte, Paris).
16.
Dell'AgneseE, 2008, “Geo-graphing: Writing worlds”, in The Sage Handbook of Political Geography Eds CoxK RLowMRobinsonJ, (Sage, London) pp 439–454.
17.
DupontL, 2004, “Le postmodernisme en géographie; débat du 17 Janvier 2003”l'Espace Géographique111–12.
FallJ, 2006, “Catalysts and converts: Sparking interest for Foucault among Francophone geographers”, in Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography Eds CramptonJEldenS, (Ashgate, Abingdon, Oxon) pp 107–128.
20.
FallJ, 2007, “Lost geographers: Power games and the circulation of ideas within Francophone political geographies”Progress in Human Geography31195–216.
21.
FergusonJRaffestinC, 1986, “Elements for a theory of the frontier”Diogenes34(134) 1–18.
22.
FoucaultM, 1976Histoire de la sexualité: La volonté de savoir (Gallimard, Paris).
23.
FrancheD, 1995, “La géopolitique comme idéologie: à propos de Claude Raffestin”Le Banquet745–53.
24.
Garcia-RamonM-D, 2003, “Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions”Progress in Human Geography2711–5.
25.
HancockC, 2010, “Pour une géographie de l'altérité: Corps de l'autre et espaces de subjectivation politique”, Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger les recherches, Université Paris-Diderot.
26.
Hérodote, 1976, “Questions à Michel Foucault sur la géographie”171–85.
27.
HubbardPKitchinRValentineG, (Eds), 2004Key Thinkers on Space and Place (Sage, London).
28.
HussyJ, 2002, “Le défi de la territorialité (extrait): La territorialité, une théorie à construire”, colloque du 28 septembre 2001 en hommage à Claude Raffestin Cahiers Géographiques 4Université de Genève.
29.
JohnstonR JSidawayJ D, 2004Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography Since 1945 (Hodder Arnold, London).
30.
JohnstonRWithersCWJ, 2008, “Knowing our own history? Geography department archives in the UK”Area403–11.
31.
KeighrenI M, 2006, “Bringing geography to the book: Charting the reception of Influences of Geographic Environment”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series31525–540.
32.
KitchinR, 2005, “Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography”Social and Cultural Geography61–15.
33.
LivingstoneD N, 2003Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
34.
LivingstoneD, 2005, “Science, text and space: Thoughts on the geography of reading”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30391–401.
35.
LonghurstR, 1997, “(Dis)embodied geographies”Progress in Human Geography21486–501.
36.
MaddrellA, 2008, “The ‘Map Girls’: British women geographers' war work, shifting gender boundaries and reflections on the history of geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series33127–147.
37.
MerrifieldA, 1995, “Situated knowledge through exploration: Reflections on Bunge's ‘Geographical Expeditions’”Antipode2749–70.
38.
MincaC, 2000, “Guest editorial: Venetian geographical praxis”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18285–289.
39.
MincaC, 2005a, “Comments on Key Thinkers on Space and Place”Environment and Planning A37168–170.
40.
MincaC, 2005b, “Italian cultural geography, or the history of a prolific absence”Social and Cultural Geography6927–949.
41.
OrainO, 2009De Plain-pied dans le Monde: Écriture et Réalisme dans la Géographie Française au XXe Siècle (l'Harmattan, Paris).
42.
PaasiA, 2005, “Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces”Environment and Planning A37769–789.
43.
PeetR, 2005, “Bio-gaze”Environment and Planning A37165–167.
44.
RacineJ-BRaffestinC, 1983, “l'espace et la société dans la géographie sociale francophone: Pour une approche critique du quotidien”, in Espace et localisation: La redécouverte de l'espace dans la pensée scientifique de langue française Eds PaelinckJSallezA, (Economica, Paris) pp 304–330.
45.
RaffestinC, 1976, “Problématique et explication en géographie humaine”Géopoint7697–104.
46.
RaffestinC, 1978, “Du paysage à l'espace ou les signes de la géographie”Hérodote990–104.
47.
RaffestinC, 1980Pour une Gèographie du Pouvoir (LITEC, Paris).
48.
RaffestinC, 1981Per una Geografia del Potere (Unicopli, Milan).
49.
RaffestinC, 1993Por una Geografia do Poder (Atica, Rio de Janeiro).
50.
RaffestinC, 1997, “Claude Raffestin, une géographie buissonnière [entretien réalisé par Bernard Elissalde]”EspacesTemps64/6587–93.
51.
RaffestinC, 2001, “From text to image”, in From Geopolitics to Global Politics: A French Connection Ed. LevyJ, (Routledge, London) pp 7–34.
52.
RaffestinC, 2005Dalla Nostalgia del Territorio al Desiderio di Paesaggio: Elementi per una Teoria del Paesaggio (Aliean Editrice, Florence).
53.
RossiU, 2008, “Commentary: Being here and there: In-betweeness, double absence, and the making of a multi-layered academic citizenship”Area40401–406.
54.
SaidE, 1991 [1978] Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (Penguin, London).
55.
SamersM, 2005, “Dancing on an asymptote, and conveying it”Environment and Planning A37171–173.
56.
SidawayJ D, 2008, “The geography of political geography”, in The Sage Handbook of Political Geography Eds CoxK RLowMRobinsonJ, (Sage, London) pp 41–55.
57.
SimonsenK, 2005, “Viewing from ‘somewhere’”Environment and Planning A37174–176.
58.
SöderströmOPhiloC, 2004, “Social geography: Looking for geography in its spaces”, in Human Geography: A History for the Twenty-first Century Eds BenkoGStrohmayerU, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 105–138.
59.
StaszakJ-F, 2001, “Les enjeux de la géographie anglo-saxonne”, in Géographies Anglo-Saxonnes: Tendances Contemporaines Eds StaszakJ-FCollignonBChivallonCDebarbieuxBde LamarlièreIGéneauHancockC, (Belin, Paris) pp 7–21.
60.
Tolia-KellyD, 2010, “The geographies of cultural geography I: Identities, bodies and race”Progress in Human Geography34358–367.
61.
WhitehandJWR, 2005, “The problem of anglophone squint: Commentary”Area37228–230.
62.
WithersCWJ, 2005, “History and philosophy of geography 2002–2003: Geography in its places”Progress in Human Geography2964–72.
